Michelson-Morley experiment reviewed with Universal
Vortical Singularity
From the perspective of Universal
Vortical Singularity (UVS), there
are two major problems with the Michelson-Morley
experiment. The first major problem is the scientific consensus on luminiferous
aether does not exist is based on a
null
hypothesis with the null
result obtained by the Michelson-Morley experiment, and its extrapolation
that free cosmic space is vacuum. The second
major problem is with the assumption that luminiferous
aether is a static medium.
The first major problem: -
The null hypothesis and its extrapolation that free cosmic space is vacuum.
"Many
astronomers believe the Milky Way is moving at approximately 600 km/s relative
to the observed locations of other nearby galaxies. Another reference frame
is provided by the Cosmic microwave background. This frame of reference indicates
that The Milky Way is moving at around 552 km/s." -
Excerpt from Wikipedia on motion
(physics).
With
the assumption that a celestial object moving in a static medium of luminiferous
aether would experience a drag, an aether wind should be detectable. In
a simplified illustration, Earth revolves at approximately 30 km/s around
Sun, the Sun revolves at approximately 232 km/s around the Galactic center
of Milky Way, therefore Earth moving in this static medium should show
a significant aether wind, and more significantly if the movement of Milky
Way in space relative to Cosmic microwave background at approximately
552 km/s is considered. If there is such an aether wind at all it should
be easily detected with the interferometer. However, in all Michelson-Morley
experiments, measurements of such expectations were not detected at all,
it was thus concluded that the postulated static luminiferous aether does
not exist at all; the postulated static luminiferous aether would have
been detected by the Michelson-Morley experiments if it exists.
Watch
a
video clip on simulating Michelson-Morley experiment in aether wind,
and also see an
animated simulation of Michelson-Morley experiment that its aether
wind speed can be varied. |
|
“Absence
of evidence is not evidence of absence.”
-
Carl Sagan
The scientific consensus on luminiferous aether
does not exist is logically fallacious,
it was based on a null hypothesis with
the null result obtained by the Michelson-Morley experiment; it had only concluded
that the quantitatively predicted aether wind was not found with the assumption
that luminiferous aether is a static medium. Neither Albert Michelson nor Edward
Morley had ever considered that their experiment had disproved the aether hypothesis;
it merely had proven that the postulated static aether did not exist but cannot
conclude that aether did not exist.
This is simply a formal
fallacy of affirmative
conclusion from a negative premise in a hasty
generalization, and null hypothesis can never be proven.
As an
analogy for the null hypoethsis with null result, it would be similar to setting
up an experiment to measure electrical power with the assumption that the electrical
energy of a running system is run by a direct current, and after the direct
current meter measured nothing, it concluded that there is no electrical power
in the system.
“Any
scientific fact must leave no room for any rational doubt.”
-
UVS inspired
In records
it was others such as Oliver Heaviside (modified Maxwell's equations),
Henri Poincaré (modified Lorentz transformation),
Robert S. Shankland (reversed Dayton Miller's claim on existence
of aether), Hermann Minkowski and partly David Hilbert (they
modified the definition for spacetime of Einstein's theory of relativity)
had concluded aether does not exist with moot reasoning (such
as aether is not required in their models) in hatch jobs of unassailable
mathematical constructs that do away the existence of aether with abstract mathematical
realms.
“Since
the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand
it myself anymore.”
-
Albert Einstein
The latest scientific evidence for free cosmic
space is not void of matter is simply overwhelming.
Vacuum
energy was scientifically proven to exist in space even when devoid of matter;
this asserts the existence of aether.
See
a UVS topic on "What
exactly is dark matter and dark energy?",
"An
immutable qualitative proof that aether exist" from the UVS perspective,
and "Four-dimensional
spacetime continuum in mathematical construct for sound wave in a vector space
void of medium" that illustrates a hatch job that could do away with
the existence of air for sound wave to propagate
in a mathematical realm.
"The
universe appears to have a smooth space-time continuum consisting of three spatial
dimensions and one temporal (time) dimension. On the average, space is observed
to be very nearly flat (close to zero curvature), meaning that Euclidean geometry
is experimentally true with high accuracy throughout most of the universe."
- Excerpt from wikipedia
in a
section on "Universe".
The above
excerpt asserts a three dimensional Euclidean space and one temporal time dimension
with experimental evidence in WMAP for its empirical observations and this is
conformed to the fundamental posits of UVS for invariant space and invariant
time. UVS rationally explain the action at a distant is communicated through
exchange of angular momentum in the atheric medium and this is inexplicable
with conventional knowledge.
“There
is no space empty of field.”
-
Albert Einstein
For
the implications with the existence of aether would have on the fundamentals
of modern physics, see UVS topics on "Qualitative
evaluation on time dilation", "UVS
resolves the GR concept of gravity" and "The
vortex legacy of Albert Einstein".
These
suggest Einstein's spacetime is the aether Einstein had propositioned and it
exists in a three spatial dimensions of space and a temporal dimension of time
that are invariants. The refractive index of spacetime as quantitatively measured
with high accuracy in proven experiments (the location of stars
near the Sun had apparently warped during solar eclipses) is therefore
the immutable proof for the existence of aether in Euclidean space; this is
contrary to the abstract view of mathematical relativism that does not question
its assumptions with the belief of transformable space or reified time.
“Time
and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live.”
- Albert Einstein
In 1920,
although Einstein officially had asserted that aether exist in an open lecture,
his peers had rhetorically refuted his rationalization and dismissed his claim
that was against their belief in those abstract mathematical constructs such
as Minkowski
spacetime in mathematical relativism. See
an external link for an address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University
of Leyden by Albert Einstein on "Ether
and the Theory of Relativity".
“...
space without ether is unthinkable;” -
Albert Einstein, on
May 5th, 1920.
It
was claimed that Dayton Miller through his interferometer experiment with positive
results had asserted that aether exists and he had held this proposition throughout
his life, but this is contrary to what was disseminated and printed in all the
books of physics. In the claim it was alleged that it was Robert S. Shankland
(the successor of Miller) who had claimed otherwise with
Miller's experiment results after Miller was no longer around, hatched on the
results selectively for it to portray that aether does not exist. See
a link on "The
Dayton Miller's ether-drift experiments" for the details of the claim.
"My
opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive
result be confirmed,
then
the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity,
in its current form, would be invalid.
Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation
would remain, however,
they would have to lead to a significantly different theory."
- Albert Einstein, in
a letter to Edwin E. Slosson, July 1925
|
The heliosphere
is a scientific evidence that Solar
System is encapsulated in a nested plasmatic bubble filled with plasma.
It is
merely the dogma in the belief system of mathematical
physics that asserts aether does not exist, the conclusion was deduced with
self-fulfilling
prophecy by self-reference
in its abstract mathematical constructs based on the absurd assumptions of transformable
space or reified time to conclude aether does not exist.
This depicted
heliosphere in essence is a nested plasmatic bubble encapsulating the Sun, is
filled with plasma that is emanated from the Sun itself.
“Looking
back at the worst times, it always seems that they were times in which
there were people who believed with absolute faith and absolute dogmatism
in something. And they were so serious in this matter that they insisted
that the rest of the world agree with them. And then they would do things
that were directly inconsistent with their own beliefs in order to maintain
that what they said was true.”
- Richard Feynman |
“Science
is the belief in the ignorance of experts.”
- Richard Feynman
The second major
problem: - The assumption that luminiferous aether is
a static medium.
The postulation
that luminiferous aether is a static medium was merely an assumption.
| Based
on the UVS
model, it is propositioned that
inviscid luminiferous aether in isotropy had vortically formed all celestial
spheroids in a vortical consolidation process; luminiferous aether is an
inviscid universal medium that in vortical motion it coagulates matters
and perpetually moves them vortically in its unisonal motion. See
UVS topics on "Unisonal
evolution mechanism" that
illustrates
on how
aether vortical motion forms nested toroidal structure and begets
everything through its wake, and "Types
of perpetual motion machine". |
|
The vortical motion of luminiferous aether would be similar to the scenario
of HL
Tau b (protoplanet) that is vortically culminated in a “womb
of gas” and this gas vortically consolidates on its star in a grander
scenario of unisonal motions. Image
on right is star HL Tau (in the center) vortically encapsulated in a "womb
of gas" with its protoplanet HL Tau b at around two o'clock position
of the star.
This is how luminiferous aether could
vortically drift in entrainment on any celestial spheroid (Sun,
planets and their moons) in a vortical push-in manner (A
phenomenon that was thought to be impossible in
conventional wisdom). In the push-in manner of luminiferous
aether as a viscous medium acting on a celestial spheroid, there should
be an aether-drift, this aether-drift that vortically encapsulates the
celestial spheroid should be relatively subtle near the surface; it would
vortically drift at a much lower angular velocity than the expected aether
wind speeds that were established for the
postulated static medium of luminiferous aether.
With imbalanced vortical aether motion in the bipolar pair of aether polar
vortices acting on Earth with an axial
tilt and an inclined
orbit around the Sun in its precession effect, the vortical aether-drift
should be subjective to a subtle dipole characteristic such that the drift
should have different velocities that are altitude and latitude dependent
in a three-dimensional geometric framework (i.e. azimuth
dependent) of the celestial spheroid; the vortical aether-drift on a celestial
spheroid should be more significant on higher altitude and higher latitude.
If the Earth drags in a medium of static aether, there would be problems
with resistance that this would drag the movement of Earth in the aetheric
medium, but if aether is vortically encapsulated on Earth in an isotropic
push-in manner, then the problem of its resistance to movement of celestial
objects is resolved.
See a UVS topic on "Polar jet
stream" that explains the momentum culmination of vortical forces. |
|
|
“In
order to make progress, one must leave the door to the unknown ajar.”
-
Richard Fenyman
To detect the vortical aether-drift with the
assumption that luminiferous aether is vortically entrained to a celestial spheroid
in the push-in manner, it requires a more sensitive interferometer that is designed
and set up for such detections. The
Dayton Miller's ether-drift experiments, although was officially reported
as also had obtained negative (null) results with the assumption that luminiferous
aether is a static medium, it was claimed that it had in fact obtained consistence
positive results of an aether-drift with the proposition that luminiferous aether
is entrained to the rotation of Earth. The concept for this aether-drift in
an analogy is liked a moving train would cause air around it to be drifted with
its movement. Nonetheless, as mentioned above, there is an irresolvable anomaly
with this aether-drift proposition that it would drag the motion of any celestial
object.
From the
UVS perspective, light could not escape the gravitational force of a black hole
infers the carriers of light wave are matters that have mass and they could
be physically interacted. Although light wave propagating in the medium of lumineferous
aether is weightless like sound waves, the carriers of light at the black hole
are pushed-in toward the black hole faster than light wave could propagate away
from the black hole; hence light could not escape. One can do a thought experiment
to visualize air is being sucked into an air vent at supersonic speed for conceptual
observation of any sound created inside the air vent to visualize that this
sound wave would not be able to escape; in analogy this could rationally explains
how light is trapped in a black hole that was inexplicable with conventional
knowledge.
A further reason why Newton rejected light as waves in
a medium was because such a medium would have to extend everywhere in space,
and would thereby "disturb and retard the Motions of those great Bodies"
(the planets and comets) and thus "as it [light's medium] is of no use,
and hinders the Operation of Nature, and makes her languish, so there is no
evidence for its Existence, and therefore it ought to be rejected."
-
Excerpt from wikipedia on "Luminiferous aether".
UVS propositions that luminiferous aether vortically
drifts in entrainment on every celestial object in the physical universe with
vortical motion in an
isotropic push-in manner. The concept for this proposition can be thought
of as the isotropic aetheric medium is in vortical motion and it pushes a drifting
celestial object within it by driving and entraining it with the momentum in
vortical motion flow of aether; this could rationally explain the aether drag
anomaly.
See
a UVS topic on "Orbit
of satellites" that elaborates on how all the Solar System objects
are revolving around the Sun in vortical motion.
Do a thought
experiment to visualize a bead suspended in water is being pushed in a vortical
flow with perpetual motion and in a steady state it spins around its axis and
in the medium it is pushed in the flow to revolve vortically around a barycenter;
it would not loose its energy as long as the external driving force is consistent.
This thought experiment could illustrate the causality for the motion of a planet
or star and how it is actually moving in space; it is being pushed in vortical
motion to revolve around its barycenter in helical path through space but in
a cognitive paradox from its inertial frame of reference it would appear to
be orbiting. Be awakened on this and one would be able to intuitively visualize
the rest on how all celestial objects move through space in the macrocosms as
well as how this works for all virtual
particles and subatomic
particles in the microcosms. See
a UVS topic on "The
geometrical structure of an atom".
It is
an immutable fact that all celestial objects including planets
and stars are moving in helical path through space and this could be visualized
from an external reference frame in their transcendental views. For the resolution
of this issue one have to let go the heliocentric
model of Solar System in its mathematical construct for the orbital motion
of satellites that was disseminated and printed on all the books for astronomy;
this is merely a localized perception with incomplete view and in its negation
it would not reflect the actual celestial
mechanics.
See
a link on "The
Universal Helicola" that presents a marvelous and immutable illustration
for spiral motion of Earth's path in space on page 269 in figure 13.1, it was
elaborated qualitatively, analytically and quantitatively. See
also video clips on "Earth
Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun"
that illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion of Earth
in a moving Sun and "The
solar system's motion thru space". Note:
These illustrations would be qualitatively more accurate if they show the barycenter
motion of a moving Sun that propagates in a composite helical path around the
Galactic Center.
By
confining within the Kepler's
laws of planetary motion on the ground that this is a scientifically proven
fact and these laws had achieved scientific consensus, taking it as it was propositioned
and therefore would not seek further inquiry for its transcendental view, one
could maintain this cognitive paradox as empirically valid in its delusion from
a localized view. See
a UVS topic on "The
cognitive paradox fallacy in Kepler's laws of planetary motion" for
further elaboration.
This is
how in a mathematical construct the laws of physics could lie; in its concept
from its localized perception it negates the reality and in its delusion it
results in its illusion of knowing with its deductive proof. See
a UVS topic on "The
paradoxical effect of nature" that elaborates on the causality of delusionary
circumstances in nature.
By assuming
that luminiferous aether is a static medium, one could maintain a fallacious
self-referential cognitive paradox with strawman
argument to assert that aether was scientifically proven to be nonexistence;
this is merely a logical fallacy of affirming
the consequent.
“The
first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest
person to fool.”
- Richard
Feynman
“Any
fundamental laws of Nature are merely phenomenological generalizations.”
-
Nancy Cartwright's distinction
“The
illusion of knowing in a delusion is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.”
- UVS
inspired
“By
denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.”
- Galileo
Galilei
“A
man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.”
-
Albert Einstein
“In
questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning
of a single individual.”
-
Galileo Galilei
“It
is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion,
however satisfying and reassuring.”
- Carl Sagan
~ With
special thanks to Allen
Barrow for his posting on protoplanet
HL Tau b, this is strong scientific evidence for evolution of stars and
planets are through vortex dynamics.
~ With special thanks to Graham
Burnett for his posting on the depicted image of heliosphere and
a NASA news report on: "Voyager
Squashes View of Solar System",
this is a scientific evidence that Solar System is encapsulated in a nested
plasmatic bubble filled with plasma.
~ With
special thanks to Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D. for his invaluable inputs and his website
on "The
Dayton Miller's ether-drift experiments".
Note: The vortical path in helical spiral of
planetary motion was independently concluded qualitatively with the UVS model,
other similar concepts were later found through the Internet, such as "Spiral
Forms in Space" as illustrated by Wilhelm Reich in the
website of Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D., "Universal
Helicola"as illustrated by
Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg
and "The solar system's
motion thru space"as illustrated by Nassim Haramein.
Feb 2007
References
and links:
Michelson-Morley
experiment
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Luminiferous
aether
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Null
hypothesis
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Null
result
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Motion
(physics)
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Formal
fallacy -
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Affirmative
conclusion from a negative premise
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hasty
generalization
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vacuum
energy
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Universe
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Minkowski
spacetime
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ether and the Theory
of Relativity - The Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)
Cosmic
Background Explorer (COBE) - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dayton
Miller's Ether-Drift Experiments -
Orgone Biophysical Research Lab
Heliosphere
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar
system
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-fulfilling
prophecy
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-reference
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mathematical
physics
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cosmic
Microwave Background Radiation - From Wikipedia, the
free encyclopedia
Cosmic
Background Explorer (COBE) - From Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia
Axial
tilt -
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Inclined orbit
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Azimuth
- From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Barycenter
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Virtual
particles -
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Subatomic particles
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heliocentrism
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Celestial
mechanics -
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The
Universal Helicola
- By Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg
Kepler's
laws of planetary motion
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Strawman
argument
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Affirming
the consequent
-
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Voyager
Squashes View of Solar System
- Mission news by NASA
A
video clip on simulating Michelson-Morley experiment in aether wind
- You Tube; pepenjuto
An
animated simulation of Michelson-Morley experiment
- Physics Flashlets; Michael Fowler
Video
clip on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun"
- By Kurdistan Planetarium
Video
clip "The solar system's motion thru space"
- By The Resonance Project / Nassim Haramein.avi
Image
of star HL Tau
- National Geographic News
counter was
reset on 02/02/2010
Disclaimers: The above revolutionary discoveries and conjectures based on an unheard-of hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity with radical ideas are unconventional, the explorations of the uncharted at fundamental stage might not be thoroughly covered, bound to have shortcomings, loose ends and errors, many details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated and proven. Many of the implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the topics presented, any term or statement if offensive in any manner or whatsoever is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Some web browsers were reported to have displayed with data corruption for text, disorganized images and some animations did not work, it is recommended to view the contents from UVS web pages with Windows Internet Explorer.
Copyright
information: Images found in this website have been used with the express permission
of the copyright holders. Wherever possible, direct credit to the origin of
the image has been provided; any re-use requires the permission of the original
copyright holder. In instances in which an image credit has not been given,
the image is understood to be in the public domain, if this is believed not
to be the case for any image, please advise with the proper credit information.
