effect of nature is a natural effect that
can mislead an observer in a state of delusion through cognitive
inversed illusions. In the UVS
worldview, the observable
universe in a universal
vortical system is imbued with this paradoxical
nature, and all its harmonically nested manifestations are inherited with
this paradoxical characteristic.
“The entire universe is apparently paradoxical.” - UVS inspired
The study on the paradoxical effect of nature for epistemic theories of truth, is focused on resolving natural cognitive paradoxes based on the UVS model. This is through identifying the vortical fractals of unisonal vortex in the empirically observed natural phenomena, and by understanding the mechanism of natural negations that are manifested to cause the delusively inversed illusions with their cognitive paradoxes.
Heuristically, this can elevate the perceptions of an observer for the natural phenomena to their transcendental levels to know how the cognitive paradoxes are counterintuitive, how they can mislead the observer with views from localized perspectives, and to simply understand fundamentally on why and how such naturally negated observations will lead to their cognitive paradox fallacies.
An empirically resolved example to illustrate a natural negation, is the perception of the Sun rising in the east from the horizon; what we are perceiving a natural phenomenon as it is might not be what it is.
The phenomenon of sunrise is a scientifically understood relative motion illusion. Its natural negating effect is caused by localized observation in a perspective on a seemingly still but rotating Earth; this is a cognitive paradox that was factually known and understood with modern science.
However, in this paradoxical effect, a majority of people even in the nowadays world are more often unwarily dwelling in the delusion of this direct perception from a localized reference frame that the Sun rises, being unaware in a casual manner are always not able to register this known cognitive paradox in a perception that observes the Sun rises in the east, until being reminded that the Sun does not rise as it apparently seems to be; this is merely the perception on a rotating Earth that renders this paradoxical effect of relative motion illusion in its delusion.
Sunrise - The Sun appears to rise from the horizon
Most of us now can comprehend without a slightest doubt in general acceptance that Earth rotates and it revolves around the Sun. However, for millenniums in the past, the majority of people from all over the whole wide world in the illusion of knowing, were generally misled by its negating paradoxical effect that renders its delusion to cause its cognitive paradox fallacy.
paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with
its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.” - UVS inspired
With manifold negating factors that are naturally manifested in the perceptions of the observer, the paradoxical effect causes natural phenomena to be intermingled with cognitive paradoxes for their localized views, and thus these would always render as wonders under all sorts of delusionary circumstance. These wonders are rendered in their delusively inversed illusions that are caused by their delusions with their cognitive paradoxes, and therefore they are counterintuitive, mysterious, confusing, and paradoxically misleading.
Paradoxically, the Sun does not rise in the east like it apparently seems to be, it is not stationary nor is it the center of the universe like it had been believed to be so with the putative laws of physics, and it is also not the central of the Solar System like it is being thought as with conventional knowledge; nothing is further from the truth than these false facts of past and present that were conceived and are still being perceived in all sorts of delusion.
The realization of a cognitive paradox awakens to its transcendental level that can resolve its delusion.
See UVS topics on "Critiques of the scientific method with mainstream consensus - Addressing the cognitive paradox fallacies" that elaborates on how we could simply be misled by some deeply rooted hard-core beliefs, and "Sunspot" that elaborates on how more than twenty mysterious phenomena of the Sun were resolved with the UVS methodology.
“The observable universe is paradoxical.” - UVS inspired
In the UVS worldview, the paradoxical effect of nature is as a result of a universal unisonal vortex mechanism that negates to cause the delusive circumstances to manifest in the cognitions of the observer; this is the causality for all sorts of natural paradox in their observations.
The paradoxical effect of nature would cause cognitive paradoxes by negating the observation of natural phenomena to mysteriously render them in delusive circumstances with all sorts of delusively inversed illusion.
See UVS topics on "Optical illusions" that elaborates on the mechanism of some paradoxical illusions, "An apparently paradoxical universe" that illustrates on some known paradoxical illusions in natural phenomena that have been empirically observed and scientifically understood, "Allegory of a flat Earth event" that elaborates on a transcendental level that could resolve its cognitive paradox, "differential rotations" that illustrates a cognitive negation, and "The vortical universe model of UVS" that illustrates on natural nested spheroidal vortices from macrocosms to microcosms in the observable universe. See also externally linked topics on "Physical paradox", "Paradox", and "Cartesian doubt".
realizing the cognitive paradoxes that negate to cause delusions in the observable
the paradoxical effect of nature has had fooled even the very brilliant people.” - UVS inspired
When one looks into the night sky to observe celestial objects, everything observed are images of the past. The nearest celestial object as observed is the image of the Moon that is about one plus second ago, the Sun as observed is its image about eight minutes and twenty seconds ago at where it was, the nearest star Proxima Centauri as observed is its image of more than four years ago, the nearest spiral galaxy Andromeda as observed is its image of approximately two and a half million years ago, and a most distance galaxy Abell 1835 IR1916 as observed is its image of more than thirteen billion years ago. In real time, all these celestial objects would have had moved to other spatial locations in their comoving distance according to their trajectories; they are not at the locations where they are apparently appearing to be. Also, the first supernova caught in the act of its runaway explosion on January 9th, 2008, labelled as SN 2008D, was in fact an event that had occurred approximately 88 million years ago from that moment when it was being observed from Earth.
“Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.” - Albert Einstein
See a UVS subtopic on “The cognitive paradox fallacy in cosmic inflation on accelerated expansion of space” that elaborates on how the cognitive paradox of an important modern discovery was resolved.
In nature, the observed optical phenomena in the observable universe that are paradoxical in all sorts of delusion, and are being rendered in delusively inversed illusions, are aplenty.
Ironically, those revolutionary discoveries of UVS were not made directly through the understanding of the UVS model, which merely describes a hypothetical model with its universal mechanism of unisonal vortex that forms naturally occurred free vortex in nested vortical formations of a vortical paradigm. It was with intellectual enlightenment in the conceptual frameworks of UVS for resolving the cognitive paradoxes of nature, and thus has had uncovered many types of hidden paradoxical effects that are delusively rendering natural phenomena with all sorts of delusively inversed illusion. This process has had solved the mysteries of many mysterious natural phenomena.
Through intellectual illuminations based on the UVS model, the cognitive paradoxes could be revealed to resolve their delusions. And these thus lead to the immediate enlightenment with pristine clarity that have resolving capability for those mysterious natural phenomena; the casuality of those mysterious natural phenomena were discovered by being enlightened intellectually in an awakened manner through knowing the paradoxical effect of nature that causes the circumstances of their delusions.
“Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of nature enlightens.” - UVS inspired
intellectual enlightenment experienced in its contemplating process, to
put it in an analogy, is while one who is stumbling in the dark and is making
diligent effort to get out of the wood, then in unexpected lightning strikes
those enigmatic scenarios on what the one was trying to figure out in the
darkness are suddenly illuminated. In flashes these render visual clarity
for the scenarios in contemplation, therefore those hard to figure out enigmatic
scenarios that are optically negated in the darkness are visually popped
out to him vividly in a sudden overall illumination. This thus renders a
holistic view of the actual scenarios in pristine clarity, and it could
therefore trigger an explosion of discoveries. This manner of acquiring
an essential knowledge that is required for breaking through is not deduced
directly from engagement in a meticulous thinking and reasoning process,
it is induced by enlightenment.
wish to find the truth, no matter where it lies. But to find the truth we need
imagination and skepticism both.
We will not be afraid to speculate, but we will be careful to distinguish speculation from fact.” - Carl Sagan
For the discovery of Archimedes' Principle, a breakthrough was made while Archimedes was taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to determine the volume of the crown for a task he has undertaken at then. For practical purposes water is incompressible, so the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the weight of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be obtained, and this was an intractable problem previously. Archimedes is said to have been so eager to share his realization that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked in a rush of jubilation proclaiming "Eureka!". Notice how the breakthrough idea had popped into his awareness in an instance on a subtle hint that is usually overlooked in a common everyday event.
“The only real valuable thing is intuition.” - Albert Einstein
Intuition is a cognitive function that apparently has the ability to acquire knowledge without inference or the use of reason, it is the immediate apprehension of an issue without the intervention of any thinking or reasoning process. By diligently engaged in a synergy of inquiry and participating in the search or investigation, the knowledge induced by intuition in pristine awareness with visual thinking would have the element of surprise in an awakened state with a rush of jubilation in its enlightenment. By making inquiry rationally with proper preparation and has good intuition for its query on a mysterious natural phenomenon, it could lead to the intellectual enlightenment that would resolve its cognitive paradox to understand the misconception, mystery, or anomaly of the natural phenomenon.
“The awakening from delusion is enlightenment.” - UVS inspired
To understand how the revolutionary discoveries were made, one should try out this intellectual enlightenment experience yourself, begin by understanding the abstracts on “UVS model”, “UVS worldview”, and “The unisonal vortex mechanism”. Be enlightened on these first, and then practice it on those mysterious natural phenomena with resolved cognitive paradoxes so as to understand the paradoxical effect of nature that renders all sorts of delusive circumstances. The awakening from a delusion is enlightenment; awakened from a delusion is enlightening.
This is an essential intellectual process for the enlightenment on those mysterious natural phenomena, where their observations have had appeared to be mysterious as a result of their cognitive paradoxes that render the delusively inversed illusions; it could shed light in an intellectual manner based on the UVS model to illuminate on dark enigmatic scenarios. After addressing a cognitive paradox, and at the moment of being snapped out of its delusion in its awakening, it could resolve its misconception, mystery, or anomaly. Thereafter, other apparently related enigmatic natural phenomena could then be further explored in a logical reflecting manner, which can be investigated by addressing their paradoxical effects for resolving their cognitive paradoxes through comparative analysis in the paradigm of vortical singularity that is scalable with the UVS model.
knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, it enlightens on
how nature does wonders in a delusory inverse manner.” - UVS inspired
Being enlightened with UVS has an awakening effect on how nature could delusively render those natural phenomena in a delusory inverse manner. This is by realizing the paradoxical effect of nature so as to resolve all sorts of cognitive paradox, and knowing the shortcomings in ourselves that would cause all sorts of misconception for the observations of natural phenomena. This has had led to the revelations for different types of unisonal vortex and their vortrexes in different forms with different mediums of viscous matter, uncovered one by one through unfolding the delusions in related natural phenomena, which evidently lead from one to another in the comparative studies that are consistently based on the UVS model. In a qualitative evaluation approach for analyzing the vortical phenomena of nature, and by enhancing visualization with clarity in a transcendental manner through inductive analysis with all other conceptual frameworks of UVS, it thus meticulously synthesizes and develops to depict the UVS worldview. And in its paradigm shift this can explicitly illustrate how the entire universe works in a unisonal vortical motion as a single system throughout macrocosms and microcosms.
Understanding the realities of nature with their enlightenments can be incredibly easy, but ironically and paradoxically, the state of such enlightenments is incredibly hard to attain. Although the basic principles of unisonal vortex mechanism could be easily understood, the fundamental concept in its paradoxical effect can be extremely difficult to grasp. This experience is similar for anyone trying to see the 3D illusionary image in a stereogram picture, and is not familiar on how to view it.
The more one tries to see the hidden image of a stereogram in a way he is usually accustomed to when looking at things, the more he could not get it at all no matter how hard he tries. It has to be tuned-in by focusing in an unusual and unfamiliar manner (e.g. using the "Single Finger Method" to induce a cross-eyed vision), then magically the hidden 3D image would appear when the cross-eyed vision or wide-eyed vision is naturally organized on the 2D pictorial.
Image on right has a stereogram of a 3D counterclockwise vortex and its harmonic vortices that are pointed toward the viewer. For beginner, please enlarge the image for easier viewing and it is recommended to use the "Single Finger Method" for visualizing the optical illusion. After getting the hang for using the "Single Finger Method", one can also view those very fascinating animated stereograms in an apparent effect of three-dimensional optical illusion without using any 3D glasses. Try some of these animated stereograms from "Helical wave patterns" and "Standing wave patterns".
It would be an awe-inspiring experience in an awakened stage of enlightenment when you begin to realize how a natural wonder works, and there are joys in finding things out. It is mesmerizing to learn from nature, which could wake up all you cells that drives you to dig up every information to understand any related working principles, and turn every stone to find answers that could lead to evidence for supporting or against a discovery. In any initial exploration for a vortically related natural phenomenon, contemplate in a meticulous manner with the UVS model to form a hypothesis, but apply necessary discretion to check if it can survive every qualitative rigor for cogency, and also discreetly avoid the pitfalls of self-fulfilling prophecy. After getting the hang of it, perhaps, you might be able to make new discoveries with this ground-breaking model of Universal Vortical Singularity in an entirely new field of your expertise, or whatsoever study you aspire on.
“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” - Albert Einstein
Under paradoxical circumstances, when interpreting the reality of a natural phenomenon as observed, we could always be fooled by our preconceived ideas that are construed with our inherent shortcomings. What we have believed as a truth of nature is one issue, what is the truth is another issue. And what we thought nature was doing as apparently observed is often delusionary inversed from what nature in reality is doing in a phenomenon that is paradoxically rendered.
The paradoxical effect of nature would always cause such phenomena to be counterintuitive for the localized observer; the realities for such natural phenomena are always hidden in delusions that would negate our perception to mislead us. Our awareness with preconceived ideas in fixed mindset is usually focused to only perceive what we have subconsciously prepared to accept, hence we are always misled by the paradoxical effect with all sorts of delusion in topsy-turvy realms.
See an awareness test video clip to understand how something so distinct within the field of direct vision can be completely overlooked right in front of our nose. See also an excerpt from "Cargo Cult Science" by Richard Feynman.
|Note: A small opaque object when is held right in front of a telescope directly blocking a distant object in the line of sight, the view magnified thirty times or more through this astronomy telescope focused on the distant object will still have a complete image of the magnified distant object that is slightly dimmer than usual in its field of view, this is without seeing the opaque object blocking the distant view. Take a lean backward and look at the lens of the eye piece and then the blocking object in front of the distant object could be seen. In peripheral vision through the telescope at a different optical wavelength that has magnified and focused on the distant object, the near object blocking in the line of sight in front of this mono vision telescope is like transparent that the distant object can be seen through the optically hollow out blockage.||
“The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” - Albert Einstein
Always examine ourselves inward, the shortcomings such as flaws and limits are absolutely within us. As a result of our limited bandwidths in many aspects, many physical realities of nature are not apparent to us. Don't be stubborn with our established concepts or ideas against nature, don't condition our thought with our wish for how nature should be doing it, don't confine the abilities of nature in our thoughts, don't be impatient when fathoming a natural phenomenon, don't be denial with what nature is revealing to us, and most of all, don't be ego.
The hardest part is with the egoistic attitude in us that would hold us from truly letting go preconceived ideas, and these would block us from any opportunity at all for resolving the cognitive paradox of any natural phenomenon that is paradoxically rendered; our ego negates our intuition to prevent us from being able to realize the paradoxes perceived in delusional circumstances. Any of such deep-rooted perceptions could only lead us to visualize any natural phenomenon with confirmation bias from its localized point of view, caused by how we have anticipated a preferred outcome that subconsciously satisfies our deep-seated belief. Thus, our perception would always end up regressing inside paradoxical realms for us to firmly believe that everything is thoroughly investigated, fully covered and correctly understood. And with such illusions of knowing, we can perpetually fool ourselves in all sorts of delusion.
The more we think we know in anything, the least we would explore outside our established understanding at the ease of our comfort zone, and the more hindrance we would have when fathoming any natural phenomenon for its reality.
“The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing.” - Socrates
To fathom any natural phenomenon with the UVS model, all other preconceived concepts have to be trashed out until we are hollowed out enough so as to become receptive for new ideas without prejudice, so that we can visualize and accept any underlying reality of nature that could be entirely different from what was firmly believed. This is no mean feat for our ego needs to be tamed and properly dealt with. And when trying to really let go any deeply rooted hard-core belief in its disbelief, one might emotionally undergo extreme traumatic mental experiences, such as stress, denial, depression, disillusioned and felt lost; in cognitive dissonance it can be very agonizing to face a total collapse of our hard-core belief.
See a UVS topic on "Logic and belief systems" that elaborates on the causality of science delusions.
“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool.” - Richard Feynman
When fathoming any mysterious phenomenon of nature with the UVS model, the first principle is that we must not fool ourselves. The next thing is to be so humble and becomes hollowed out in preparedness, and know that we are actually ignorance of it. In the contemplating process, have integrity and be absolutely honest with ourselves on any finding. And without a slightest attachment to our thoughts on any finding, have perseverance and stay focused. Put our preconceived ideas aside and free our imagination, surrender our rigid mind to our intuition, do not expect anything but be opened to everything including contradictions. And be malleable, then let the imagination run, let it flow and let it show.
could render us the insights only when we are hollowed out in preparedness,
and has become truly humble with a pure intention to know.” - UVS inspired
The humility required to subdue our egoism is not attained through the act of consciously cared behaviours to deliberately show that we are very humble; it helps to cultivate but in plain acts without quality this would not suffice. To be truly humble for contemplating on natural phenomena with a pure intention to know, in essence it needs internalized cultivation. This requires us to recognize and know that our hindrances and shortcomings are caused by our inherent limits, and honestly acknowledge that inherently we are cognitively negated ignorant fools when pitting against nature. When we try to comprehend by means that have limited bandwidth in a spectrum to interpret a natural phenomenon that has a constituency of immeasurable frequency spectrums, and not knowing what exactly is referenced to, all sorts of misconception would intrinsically occur.
“Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them.” - Albert Einstein
To resolve a mysterious natural phenomenon in the UVS worldview, its counterintuitive issue has to be brought to a clear transcendental cognitive awareness, so as to be able to vividly imagine it, conceptually feel it, and intellectually interacts with it to understand it intuitively; the key is to find ways to interact with nature to understand the working mechanism for resolving its cognitive paradox in the conceptual frameworks of UVS. Recapitulating with the example for the perception on a rotating Earth, it could be conceptualized to understand its delusion by doing a thought experiment to transcendentally visualize how the rotating Earth would cause the relative motion illusion of a rising and setting Sun, which as a matter of fact is being observed on Earth in its delusory localized perception. With this enlightenment it thus intellectually resolves the cognitive paradox of the apparent observation by knowing its natural negation, which is primarily as a result of the Earth's rotating motion that paradoxically appears to be at rest in its delusion.
“Instead of dwelling on reasons for there is no way through, always find for the way through.” - UVS inspired
See a UVS topic on "Do an interactive experiment to understand the effects of torque-free precession" that illustrates some examples to intuitively understand some paradoxical effects of nature.
Based on the UVS model, when the perception of a mysterious natural phenomenon in contemplation is naturally and gradually organized in a coherent flow, in pristine clarity with transcendental visualization and understanding, we could be amazingly enlightened unexpectedly by an intellectual spark that would resolve the cognitive paradox of the natural phenomenon. With the pristine clarity, the resolving capability for mysterious natural phenomena is simply amazing when they are illuminated by the intellectual enlightenment in the conceptual frameworks of UVS.
Through knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, and based on the UVS model for its empiricism in the discipline of epistemology, intellectual enlightenment on mysterious natural phenomena begets with the illumination of the UVS worldview.
“A paradoxical universe requires intellectual enlightenment to explore the uncharted.” - UVS inspired
- UVS inspired .
|A category of paradox with illusions that involve perception or awareness, such as relative motion illusion, optical illusion, tactile illusion and the likes.|
|A false belief or opinion: delusions of grandeur.|
|Full comprehension of a situation with clarity of perception.|
|To penetrate to the truth of; comprehend; understand.|
|The first basis from which a thing is known.|
|Concerned with wholes rather than analysis or separation into parts.|
|A form of analysis based on inductive reasoning; a researcher using inductive analysis starts with answers, but forms questions throughout the research process.|
|A peculiar type of illusion that paradoxically appears in an inverse manner.|
|A natural phenomenon is a non-artificial event in the physical sense, and therefore not produced by humans, although it may affect humans.|
|A state of existence beyond perceivable bandwidth therefore renders as nothing in the perceived state; the state of being nothing.|
|The observable segment of the universe.|
|A set of forms all of which contain a particular element, esp. the set of all inflected forms based on a single stem or theme.|
|Any thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature with false proposition.|
|The effects of a cognitive paradox that is rendered in its state of delusion to perpetually fool us in a perception with its cognitive fallacy.|
|To put forward as the factual basis for an argument.|
|To assume the truth, reality, or necessity of, as a basis of an argument.|
|A geometrical figure similar in shape to a sphere, such as an ellipsoid.|
|The totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space; the cosmos; macrocosm. It is beyond the defined observable universe.|
|Having the property of viscosity; sticky.|
|A vortical culmination of aether in vortical motion that unisonally spawns its resonated and nested satellite vortical fractals in its vortical paradigm.|
Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to Universal Vortical Singularity (aka UVS) on "The paradoxical effect of nature":
“Cognitive paradoxes are events whose subjective reality is overwhelming.” - Neil Vodavzny, 20 Aug 2015.
“UVS is a paradox that will bring another paradigm shift...A giant step toward TOE. ” - James A. Graber (aka Jag of TOEQuest Forum) with twenty-eight years into vortex research, 8th Aug 2012.
“I can hardly wait for you to enlighten the world to a new way of seeing the dynamics of Reality.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 17th Oct 2010.
“I once again thank you for being the one that pushed me over the edge from the realm of "Substance", to the realm of "Motion". Studying all the religions, Sciences of Mind , and Sciences of Substance, could not do it for me. Instead it took your theory of the "Vortex" to enlighten me to the fact that it is a, "NON-Substance Something", that is the creator of "Form" and thus, the Universe.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 16th Feb 2010.
“An intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!” - Dr. Wayne Nowland, physicist, researcher, philosopher & author of Interdimensional Science & Philosophy, planned and launched Australia's first AUSSAT communications satellite system, Dec 2009.
“Vincent, I am convinced that UVS would give satisfactory answers to most of the mysteries...” - Dipayan Kar (aka dipayankar of TOEQuest Forum), 20th Sep 2008.
“Objectively speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”, “With great respect, Vladimir.” - Dr. Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician, accomplished engineer, author of "Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy", "Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books such as "Metallurgical Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds over fifty U.S. and foreign patents, 28th Jun 2009.
“Vincent I think I finally got you; the whole universe is twisted!” - Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum), 2008.
“OH boyohboyohboy ... Consciousness of natural event, paradoxical from the beginning, paradoxical from reasoning, paradoxical from rationalization, paradoxical from depiction, and on and on the paradoxes go .... even when we say consciousness ends the paradox is it does not, so there will be then ... what? Paradoxes for it all?” - Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum), 2008.
“It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 10th Apr 2008.
Observable universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Epistemic theories of truth - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sunrise - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perceptions - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centripetal force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centrifugal forces - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Physical paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cartesian doubt - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Moon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sun - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proxima Centauri - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Andromeda - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abell 1835 IR1916 - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comoving distance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
SN 2008D - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Optical phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Understanding - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intellectual - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intuition - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Inference - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Visual thinking - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nature - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stereogram - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paradigm shift - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Macrocosm and microcosm - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Single Finger Method - by Magic Eye, Inc.
Self-fulfilling prophecy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archimedes' Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eureka - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Confirmation bias - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comfort zone - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cognitive dissonance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Empiricism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Epistemology - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lightning animation - Prince Adrien
Wobbling spheres animation - ThinkQuest Library
Image of vortex stereogram - Mitch Waite Books
Image of an asian elephant - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image of forest fire - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image of sunrise - Image credit of Vincent Wee-Foo
The Emperor's New Clothes - www. mindfully.org; An Anderson's tale
illusion of knowing and the illusion of having control
Without knowing the triggering mechanism and the causes for ambiguities in a paradox, we could be misled and therefore derive or follow sophisticated theories that were developed based on misconceptions. In a delusion with faith established on its illusion of knowing, and egoism brewing from illusion of having control, in a state of serenity embracing the delusion as an unshakable belief with circular reasoning in a stubborn manner swearing by it, we can perpetually fool ourselves.
things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein
A California wildfire - The burn of the century
Al Nino effect was blamed for a California wildfire that had raged for weeks and reduced everything to ashes in its wake, in the disaster thousands of houses were lost and many firefighters were among those who have perished in this burn of the century, the event was officially termed as "Act of God".
A meticulous investigation suggests there was a more fundamental cause that thus had evolved into this fire monster.
|In relentless efforts for decades, human have seemed to be able to overcome nature for its spontaneous wildfires, this was by enforcing legislation with strict measures to suppress all fires quickly, made efficient with evolving technologies to effectively control their spread. However, the successful measures for decades had resulted in massive cumulation of combustible materials, heavily stacked by fallen branches, leaves and the likes, layers over layers ladened on over the years. With the arrival of Al Nino effect affecting climate in a perfectly prepared situation, and with a cue that could be initiated by a lightning strike, the forest was burned in huge towering flames that were never witnessed before in wildfire history. This wildfire could not be effectively suppressed, had raged for weeks relentlessly and in its grand-scale everything the community had guarded for decades were all helplessly up in smokes.|
The firefighters thought they knew every aspect of fire, they didn't. In all those years they thought they have the situations under control, that was also an illusion. For this case, it took the awe of nature for us to wake up from this cognitive paradox of our delusion, and realize the real culprit for this burn of the century; our ignorance.
is relentless and unchangeable, and it is indifferent as to whether
its hidden reasons and actions are understandable to man or not.” - Galileo Galilei
“The illusion of knowing in a delusion is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.” - UVS inspired
A sixth sense myth
|It was speculated that since ancient time, just before a natural disaster would occur, some animals and insects seem to know it in advance and at a same time all of them would dash out from their hideouts and run for safety. More recently, it was well documented that just before the Boxing day Tsunami strikes, many elephants at different locations in Sri Lanka and Thailand had acted in a strange but synchronized manner and went uphill, their acts had also saved the life of many other people and their gratified keepers. In contemplating the reasons for this phenomenon, a group of people in metaphoric thinking had believed beyond doubt that the elephants have "sixth sense", as in some kind of out of the world supernatural ability with a mystical type of connection among the elephants that is physically inexplicable.|
See a news report on "Tsunami Animals: A Sixth Sense?".
However, before an earthquake or when a Tsunami has initiated, it is known that the Earth or sea would rumble with low frequencies and electromagnetic waves emission occurs. It is now known that these infrasound vibrations though are inaudible to the human ears, can be thunderous roars of nature to seismically disturb these creatures on different continents. And the influence of electromagnetic waves emission during the geological event could also had prompted those sensitive animals to flee. Any of these mechanisms could therefore have caused a synchronized reaction for these creatures on different continents to run for their life.
See a UVS topic on "Natural events on Earth with aligned and cross-aligned Solar System objects" that illustrates an externally triggered causality for natural events.
The manner without a solid basis with clear definitions one can quickly crank up a not falsifiable proposition for any mysterious phenomenon that is inexplicable by common sense can mask ignorance, in its illusion of knowing it has the comfort of being at ease, this can also boost confidence with a sense of superiority in its illusion of having control. This is a propositional fallacy of affirming the consequent to assert the mythical belief; see how easily human mind can be steered in a delusion with an inclination towards a belief that has a higher order type of abstract explanation that loops in circular reasoning?
There are lots of busted myths for old and new ones alike, however, human psychology tends to hold firmly onto believing in myths.
can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief
is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe.” - Carl Sagan
“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” - Galileo Galilei
a bias for believing what is not true, and refuse to believe what is true
by being denial, one can persistently fool himself with the founded consistency
in its delusion to validate his paradoxical perception.” - UVS inspired
A millenniums-old circular logic - "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"
|Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This circular logic has been explored from all angles with all definitions by all cultures in all ways of looking at it through all great minds with over at least twenty-five centuries of debates, the paradox was generally thought as could never be solved at all.|
Chickens hatch from eggs, but eggs are laid by chickens, making it difficult to say which originally gave rise to the other. To ancient philosophers, the question about the first chicken or egg also evoked the questions of how life and the universe in general began. - Excerpt from Wikipedia on "The chicken or the egg".
Based on a concept of evolution in modern knowledge, through inductive reasoning that macroevolution happens and new animal species were evolved; whatever laid the egg that had hatched into a first distinct chicken, that whatever was not a chicken by specific definition. The answer to this question according to its specifications, egg definitely had come first before the first chicken could be evolved. Specifically, this egg with an embryo of a chicken that had hatched into a first chicken was not an egg of chicken. There is a specific difference between the non-chicken egg and a chicken egg; i.e. chicken egg is laid by chicken.
See externally linked topics on "Evolution", and "Darwin's Finches" that elaborates on the sympatric speciation in some passerine birds, and a video presentation on "David Attenborough on Darwin".
The problems of the chicken and egg issue were caused by the ambiguity in the definitions, they were used in a paradoxical way to deny any answer in circular manners; the problems were caused by fallacies of definition. The ways the chicken and egg issue were probed are also very questionable; abstract reasoning in circular logic were used just to deny any answer so as to sustain the belief for whatsoever reasons that the puzzle could not be solved. It did block all the bad answers with loose points, but it has blocked all answers entirely to an extend that there is no point in trying to attempt any answer at all under such rhetorical refutes in their abstracts. At any point of an argument, to falsify an answer, any mean that could be used, would be used against any answer by contradicting it, often they were with incompatible references, be it the theory of evolution itself, an established knowledge or hypothesis, an excerpt from a holy book, any philosophy, and even ambiguity of the definitions were also used; these evaluation were carried out on illogical basis fenced up with selective rules to critically suppress any answer by denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent.
It is illogical to expect a definite answer to be consistence when the questions are put forth in a paradox with ambiguous definitions on the chicken and egg issue; it could never have a definite answer to the non-consistent question. It is illogical to think that by cracking this chicken and egg sequence it should also be able to find the answer for “how life and the universe in general began”, and hence has expected the answer to be something that is more sophisticated and complex. Attached to this notion, simple straight answer that does not fit the bracket would not even be considered as authentic with such fixed mindset.
Even by changing the definitions in any way for this issue, it would still have a precedent and therefore would still have a definite answer to it; an egg laid by a chicken is a chicken egg and this is regardless to whatever it hatches into. Therefore if the question goes “Which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?”, then the definite answer is chicken had to come first; this is a logically valid answer to the specifically defined question from the evolutionism point of view.
It is true that “At no point was a ‘chicken egg’ created from a distinct ‘non-chicken’ species”, but this argument that was used to refute the answer was non sequitur. A “non-chicken” of course could not have laid a “chicken egg”, moreover, the conclusion was unrelated and could not conclude egg did not come first. In its Gettier problem it merely confuses the issue by contradicting it with a valid proposition that does not address the issue at all; this is a red herring fallacy of ignoratio elenchi. Note: The argument on “At no point was a ‘chicken egg’ created from a distinct ‘non-chicken’ species.” had been removed from an earlier version of "The chicken or the egg?" article from Wikipedia.
With lame logic and moot reasoning that asserts ambiguity, we can persistently confuse and fool ourselves.
“When we try to comprehend by means that have limited bandwidth in a spectrum
to interpret a natural phenomenon that has a constituency of immeasurable frequency spectrums,
and not knowing what exactly is referenced to, all sorts of misconception would intrinsically occur.” - UVS inspired
Wildfire - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boxing day Tsunami; Elephant - HarperCollins Publishers Australia
Tsunami Animals: A Sixth Sense? - By FoxNews
Affirming the consequent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Infrasound - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The chicken or the egg - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Macroevolution - The TalkOrigins Archive
Theory of evolution - Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia
Evolution - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Darwin's Finches - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sympatric speciation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fallacies of definition - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Denying the antecedent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Affirming the consequent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Non sequitur - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gettier problem - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ignoratio elenchi - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Video of David Attenborough on Darwin- By Nature Video
Image of chicken and egg - www.youpolls.com
The vortex legacy of Albert Einstein - From the UVS perspective
The philosophy of science advocated by Albert Einstein, proposed empiricism blends with scientific realism for a holism of the universe.
Einstein had pursued relentlessly throughout his life for attempting to find and develop a unifying theory based on a single model to explain all fundamental interactions of nature, and this theory was supposed to fully explain and link together all known natural phenomena in the physical world.
See externally linked topics on "Einstein's Philosophy of Science", "Theory of everything" for references.
Although the rotational frame-dragging effect based on spacetime curvature concept in Einstein's theory of general relativity can rationally explain and mechanically account for the force dynamics of tropical cyclone, supercell, tornado and the likes, this theory represented by Einstein was rejected by his peers led by meteorologists of top ranks and files.
See an externally linked topic on “Four centuries of conflicts” that accounted on the debates for Coriolis effect.
Thereafter, any attempt to theorize on lower latitude atmospheric vortices with this rotational frame-dragging effect as a result of Earth's rotation with the fabric of spacetime that twists like a vortex, has been canonically refuted with the scientific consensus for Coriolis effect.
From the UVS perspective, the rotational frame-dragging effect with its equivalence principle based on a spacetime free vortex concept, is a valid theory in place of Coriolis effect. It has accounted for an exchange of angular momentum, and with differential rotation it causes the perpetual momentum to vortically impel an atmospheric vortex with Earth's cyclonic gravity field effect.
See UVS topics on "Cyclonic gravity field effect" that illustrates rotational frame-dragging is a vortical motion caused by geometric gravity of a rotating celestial spheroid, "The unisonal vortex mechanism", and "Cosmic evolution of stars and galaxies" for more illustrations on vortically impelled natural phenomena.
|Einstein's general theory of relativity (GR), which is a geometric theory of gravitation,with Lorentz transformation it can make more accurate quantitative predictions that are consistent with the experimental data of empirical observations. In the standard cosmology model, GR can more accurately describe the coupling effects of gravity in curved spacetime for large celestial objects in its conceptual framework. Consistently, it can also accurately quantify intergalactic gravity effects for stars of a whirling galaxy in perpetual motion, which describes stars revolve around a supermassive black hole by interacting relatively with each other in the curved spacetime metric tensors of their gravitational field.|
Note: Geodetic effect in the GR framework describes spacetime forced vortex caused by geometric gravity of matter that results the curvature of spacetime.
Evidently, the young Einstein was already familiar with the vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz, who was a renowned physicist and had contributed to the knowledge of thermodynamics, electrodynamics, the studies for vortex motion in fluids, and he was also known for conservation of energy. In August 1899, Einstein mentioned: "I admire ever more the original, free thinker Helmholtz".
See an externally linked topic on "Vortex dynamics" that elaborates on the vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz.
And seemingly, GR with equivalence principle as the fundamental background concepts, discreetly correlates as a spacetime vortex model for describing gravitational effects in curved spacetime. Analytically, in the general relativity point of view, gravity as a result of spacetime (aether) distortion causes Earth to fall perpetually into the spacetime distortion of the Sun. A satellite captured by Earth's gravity (with its spacetime distortion) to revolve around the Earth, is in essence falling perpetually into the spacetime distortion of a perpetually moving away Earth; the invariable plane where the Earth apparently sits on is in fact not at rest. In this hypothetical construct of the spacetime distortion model, in equilibrium vortical motion, the perpetual falling Earth keeps its spiraling satellites from not falling down to Earth.
See a UVS subtopic on "The orbit of satellite" for further elaboration.
At the age of fifteen Einstein wrote his first scientific work, "The Investigation of the State of Aether in Magnetic Fields", and he had incorporated the concept of aether (spacetime continuum is ether-like) discreetly into his later research in "Einstein æther theory" with a scalar field, and accounted for the cause of geometric gravity with a positive cosmological constant (aka dark energy). At then, the aether hypothesis of Christiaan Huygens and the "Carteisan Cosmology" founded with "Theory of Vortices" by Rene Descartes had been rejected on the basis that empty space is void of aether by Isaac Newton with Newton's Principia, this was further substantiated with the famous Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) that there was no aether wind, and at then this conclusion could not be rejected. Presumably, Einstein therefore could not officially propose the existence of aether with such hardcore rejections by his peers.
See a UVS topic on "Michelson-Morley experiment reviewed with UVS" for further elaboration on a postulated luminiferous aether.
"Michelson and Morley in 1887 designed an experiment, which employed an interferometer and a half-silvered mirror, that was accurate enough to detect aether flow. The mirror system reflected the light back into the interferometer. If there were an aether drift, it would produce a phase shift and a change in the interference that would be detected. However, given the results were negative, rather than validating the aether, based upon the findings aether was not confirmed. This was a major step in science that eventually resulted in Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity." - Excerpt from Wikipedia on Lorentz transformation.
Many in the Newtonian era who had openly held the proposition that aether exists, or any concept implying a universal medium that pervades the observable universe, were either prosecuted, discredited, pushed aside or simply left high and dry by depriving them from institutional resources. Iconic proponents of aether theory who had received such treatments include Rene Descartes, Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, Hannes Alfven and many others.
See externally linked topics on "Challenging dominant physics paradigms", "Rene Descartes' Theory of Vortices", "Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity", "Space and the Hydrogen Age" by Walter Russell, and "Plasma cosmology" of Hannes Alfvén.
Maxwell equations were originally based on aether as a mechanical model, and the original idea for Lorentz transformation was also based on aether that describes it like a Doppler effect. However, under peer pressure these theologians were tactically forced to abandon the concept of an aether-filled space, and subsequently their theories were somehow reformed to the mathematical constructs with different concepts of space that do not require aether.
Newton rejected the aether hypothesis of Christiaan Huygens and the Descartes' aether "vortex theory" of planetary motion, even the later published Newton's aether model was deliberated as flawed and was therefore rejected.
Einstein's universe proposed in 1917, is a closed system of dark energy described with a positive cosmological constant, is a model for which space is neither expanding nor contracting and contains uniform dust. This was refuted after Hubble's discovery on receding galaxies in 1922 that suggests the observable universe was expanding, and it was empirically observed to be much bigger than what Einstein had proposed with his universe model. Consequently, Einstein's cosmological constant, which was associated with the postulated size of a much smaller universe, along with his static universe hypothesis, his postulation of aether, his posits of invariant space and invariant time, as well as the belief that Milky Way's galactic center is the center of the universe, were eventually rejected with the scientific consensus for the Big Bang theory, which postulated metric expansion of space with the current form of relativistic theory that posits variant space and variant time without an all-pervasive physical aether.
See a UVS topic on "Four-dimensional spacetime continuum in mathematical construct for sound wave in a vector space void of medium". See also externally linked topics on "Einstein–Hilbert action" in a significant event for physics in November 1915 that had led to the current definition for spacetime in mathematical relativism, and an address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden by Albert Einstein on "Ether and the Theory of Relativity" that was rejected by his peers.
Seemingly, Einstein had held on his postulation of aether, and this was never let up unlike it was generally believed that he had abandoned the hypothesis of an aether-filled universe with the posits of invariant space and time. Between a rock and a hard place with the consensus on non-existence of aether could not be rejected at then, Einstein could therefore have had morphed aether as spacetime continuum, in an interchanged manner the invariant space or invariant time was swapped with invariant aether, and the variant aether was swapped with a variant spacetime continuum. In this ingenious manner, Einstein can avoid the relentless onslaughts from his peers and thus can capitulate to the scientific consensus that was dogmatically against any theory that postulated aether.
In the transistion from classical physics era, if Einstein did not morph aether as spacetime, his theory of relativity would be completely rejected as well, which would impede him on bringing to humanity its know-how applications.
See an externally linked topic on "Albert Einstein, Alt-Ac Pioneer" that articulated on the alternative path Einstein had took for the inception of his scientific revolution.
“There is no space empty of field.” - Albert Einstein
“The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.” - Albert Einstein
“It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction.” - Cited by Albert Einstein
In the address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden, Einstein categorically mentioned "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time". He also categorically mentioned space is his measuring rod (invariant) and time is his measuring clock (invariant). In GR where aether was supposedly swapped with invariant space or invariant time, an ambiguity in circular logic would occur in linguistic manner and when aether was treated as an invariant scalar field therefore Einstein further mentioned "this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.".
See a video clip on "Einstein Relativity theory declares aether necessary!" for the decleration of aether made by Einstein on May 5th, 1920.
“... space without ether is unthinkable;” - Albert Einstein, on May 5th, 1920..
“Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live.” - Albert Einstein
Moreover, it was not like a third party trying to interpret what it meant by the term “spacetime” that was originally coined by Einstein. It was none other than the author of "Theory of relativity" who had published these papers since 1905 through 1915, which had thus began the era of modern physics, and Einstein by himself, not through another party, after 1919 with the world famous initial successful test of general relativity, was trying to tell the world in 1920 with his definitions to clarify what he meant by spacetime.
“A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.” - Albert Einstein
From the UVS perspective, the mainstream theory of relativity was misled in all sorts of delusion (see a UVS topic on "Qualitative evaluation on time dilation" that illustrate some of the delusions) in the manifold of cognitive paradoxes, and hence suffered foundational crisis, it therefore could not be cut out in a single model from quantum levels to cosmic levels. Hitherto, the questions remain unanswered in modern physics on how general relativity could be reconciled with the laws of quantum physics to produce a complete and self-consistent theory for gravity that unifies with quantum mechanics.
See UVS topics on "UVS resolves the GR concept of gravity", and "Geometric push-in gravity" that elaborates on the causality of gravity. In the UVS worldview, gravity is an isotropic push-in inertial of an aetheric medium in vortical motion, and this hypothesis can coherently and consistently unify with the other three fundamental forces of nature.
Any relativist who believes that space and time are variants, therefore the phenomena of transformations in relative motion of uniform velocity are physically real in symmetrical situation, symmetrical length contraction in special relativity (SR) is physical, gravitational field physically distorts space and time, active transformations of time for time dilation effect in SR and gravitation time dilation in GR are scientifically proven, and one-way travel into the future in forward time travel is physically possible, he just needs to investigate the explanation by Einstein on time dilation effect in SR for clarification.
“Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore.” - Albert Einstein
"In special relativity, the time dilation effect is reciprocal: as observed from the point of view of any two clocks which are in motion with respect to each other, it will be the other party's clock that is time dilated. ", "In the special theory of relativity, a moving clock is found to be ticking slowly with respect to the observer's clock. If Sam and Abigail are on different trains in near-lightspeed relative motion, Sam measures (by all methods of measurement) clocks on Abigail's train to be running slowly and, similarly, Abigail measures clocks on Sam's train to be running slowly.", "Symmetric time dilation occurs with respect to temporal coordinate systems set up in this manner. It is an effect where another clock is being viewed as running slowly by an observer. Observers do not consider their own clock time to be time-dilated, but may find that it is observed to be time-dilated in another coordinate system.". Excerpts from Wikipedia on "Time dilation" and in a section at "Time dilation is symmetric between two inertial observers".
It is absolutely clear that time dilation effect in SR is merely an optical illusion of relative motion with uniform velocity in its symmetrical situation, and based on light propagation has limited speed with the posit of invariant space and time (one temporal dimension of time and three-dimensional Euclidean space), in an aether-filled universe, the other propositions of Einstein's theory of relativity that are related to time dilation, can be coherently clarified without any contradiction and are free of paradoxes. These understandings can reveal the relativism of modern physics that posits variant space and variant time, is a cargo cult science of nature.
See a UVS subtopic on "Reviews on time dilation effect in Einstein's special theory of relativity" for further elaboration.
"My opinion about Miller's experiments is the following. ... Should the positive result be confirmed, then the special theory of relativity and with it the general theory of relativity, in its current form, would be invalid. Experimentum summus judex. Only the equivalence of inertia and gravitation would remain, however, they would have to lead to a significantly different theory." - Albert Einstein, in a letter to Edwin E. Slosson, July 1925
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” - Albert Einstein
imagine that I look back on my life's work with calm satisfaction.
But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept
of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain
whether I am in general on the right track.”
- Albert Einstein, on his 70th birthday, in a letter to Maurice Solovine, 28 March 1949.
Seemingly, Einstein knew if the existence of aether is proven, the theory of relativity in its current form that posits variant space and time, would be invalid.
See externally linked topics on “Quantum vortices of Bose-Einstein condensate” and "EPR paradox" where it mentioned Einstein never accepted quantum mechanics as a "real" and complete theory for its "spooky action at a distance", struggling to the end of his life for an interpretation that could comply with relativity without complying with the paradoxical Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
“Quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory.” - Einstein's proposition
Perhaps his vortex legacy is recently becoming profound with Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC), this is an accomplished scientific research in quantum physics with electromagnetically induced vortices that are quantized and known to be in precession as a result of their interactions with photons in an enclosure. A quantum vortex started in such frictionless medium with zero viscosity would spin in perpetual motion, and would not stop by itself in its encapsulated closed-system static quantum universe.
This contemporary physics theory was recently proved in experiments after seventy years later with the first gaseous condensate produced, and the physicists involved won the Nobel Prize in Physics 2001.
See externally linked topics on "Stop light experiment", and "'Tornadoes' Are Transferred From Light To Sodium Atoms" that demonstrates in an experiment on light (Electromagnetic radiation) interacting with matter, it elaborates on a new quantum physics technique and this can be used to manipulate Bose-Einstein condensates by transferred orbital angular momentum. This is essentially the same motion as air molecules in a tornado or a planet revolving around a star--from laser light to sodium atoms.
From the UVS perspective, when certain atoms are cooled to a specific temperature, they could be vortically resonated with an all-pervasive undulating aetheric wave for manifesting their inviscid characteristic. In a quantized state of atomic vortexes that are precessing in resonance with their two-axis spin, it renders a viscous medium of atoms to become inviscid.
See a UVS topic on "The structure of atom" that elaborates on vortical interactions at the atomic and subatomic levels.
quest towards unity through a great awakening.
Dedicated to Albert Einstein, and also to all who had contributed for the quest towards unity, in searching for a unifying theory of everything (TOE) based on the reality of nature.
~ With special thanks to Professor Christopher W. Hodshire for his private message on highlighting the link to "Albert Einstein, Alt-Ac Pioneer" that articulated on the alternative path Einstein had took for the inception of his scientific revolution.
~ With special thanks to Neil Vodavzny for his article on "SOMEHOW I DON’T THINK WE’RE IN KANSAS, TOTO", which is a quote from the musical "The Wizard of Oz". This article elaborates on the dialectic of nature in social systems, and correlates it with the paradoxical effect of nature.
“Cognitive paradoxes are events whose subjective reality is overwhelming.” - Neil Vodavzny, 20 Aug 2015.
Albert Einstein - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Philosophy of science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Empiricism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific realism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Holism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's Philosophy of Science - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philopophy; SEP
Theory of everything - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rotational frame-dragging effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Spacetime - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Coriolis effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Four centuries of conflicts - Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Geodetic effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
General theory of relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Metric tensor - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Equivalence principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Space-time Vortex - SCIENCE@NASA
Invariable plane - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz - A history and philosophy of fluid mechanics By G. A. Tokaty
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Aether - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Geometric gravity - Einstein online
Cosmological constant - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Theory of Vortices - CyberBrahma
Carteisan Cosmology - Standard encyclopedia of philosophy
Rene Descartes - New Science Theory
Newton's Principia - xtimeline
Michelson-Morley experiment - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Luminiferous aether - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ether vortex motion - new-science-theory.com
Vortex dynamics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lorentz transformation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doppler effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's aether model - Eric Baird
Theory of relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity - PESWiki.com
Space and the Hydrogen Age - By Walter Russell
Plasma cosmology - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bose-Einstein condensate - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Precession - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
EPR paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Spooky action at a distance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop light experiment - From Harvard University Gazette
'Tornadoes' Are Transferred From Light To Sodium Atoms - ScienceDaily
Light - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electromagnetic radiation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classical physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Know-how - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Modern physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ether and the Theory of Relativity - The Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)
Aether and general relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hubble's discovery on receding galaxies - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific consensus - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Milky Way's galactic center as center of the universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Big Bang - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Metric expansion of space - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Modern physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum mechanics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gravity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein–Hilbert action - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A significant event for physics in November 1915 - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Successful tests of general relativit - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cargo cult science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Time dilation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wobbling spheres animation - ThinkQuest Library
Helical wave patterns - From 3dWonderStuff
Standing wave patterns - From 3dWonderStuff
Animated artist impression of a spheroidal quantum vortex - Courtesy of Thomas Seifert by email
Animation for fratals of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
Image of Bose-Einstein Condensates and Atom Lasers - Center for Quantum-Atom Optics
Einstein Relativity theory declares aether necessary! - Youtube, bralkar
counter was reset on 02/02/2010
Disclaimers: As far as the mainstream modern physics is concerned, the above revolutionary discoveries and conjectures based on the unheard-of hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity with its paradigm shift are unconventional. Also the evaluation of the uncharted at fundamental stage might not be thoroughly covered, bound to have shortcomings, loose ends and errors, many details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or proven. Many of the implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the topics presented in the UVS worldview, any term or statement if offensive in any manner or whatsoever is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Some web browsers were reported to have displayed with data corruption for text, disorganized images, it is therefore recommended to view the UVS web sites with Windows Internet Explorer. However, some external links might have ceased to exist, some images can fail to load, and somehow some animations could not work, also some copyrighted materials cannot be illustrated in the UVS web pages, and these could compromise its presentation to some extend.
Copyright information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origin of the work or images were provided, be it on fair dealing, with explicit permission from their owners, or the materials were believed to be in the public domain. In instances for which any external material has any issue, kindly advise for its proper.