“The entire universe is apparently paradoxical.” - UVS inspired

The study on the paradoxical effect of nature for epistemic theories of truth is focused on resolving natural cognitive paradoxes based on the UVS model. This is through identifying the vortical singularities of unisonal vortex, and by understanding the mechanism of natural negations that are involved to cause complexly inversed illusions in the observations of natural phenomena. Heuristically, this would elevate the perception of an observer for such natural phenomenon to a transcendental level to know how the cognitive paradoxes are counterintuitive, how they can mislead the observer with views from localized perspectives, and to simply understand fundamentally on why such direct observations would lead to cognitive paradox fallacies.

What we have perceived a natural phenomenon as it is might not be what it is, a resolved example is the perception of the Sun rising in the east from below the horizon. This is a scientifically understood relative motion illusion that its natural negating effect is caused by localized observation in a perspective on a rotating Earth; a known and understood cognitive paradox. However, in this paradoxical effect, a majority of people even in the nowadays world are more often unwarily dwelling in the delusion of this direct perception from a localized reference frame that the Sun rises, being unaware in a casual manner are always not able to register this known cognitive paradox in a perception that observes the Sun rises in the east, until being reminded that the Sun does not rise as it apparently seems to be; this is merely the perception on a rotating Earth that renders this paradoxical effect of relative motion illusion in its delusion. See an external link on "Sunrise" that elaborates on several illusions related to the Sun.

Sunrise

All of us now can comprehend without a slightest doubt in general acceptance that Earth rotates and it revolves around the Sun, however, in the past, for millenniums, not knowing the delusion, the majority of people all over the whole wide world in an illusion of knowing were generally misled by its paradoxical effect and therefore could not understand the cognitive paradox fallacy.

“A paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.” - UVS inspired

With manifold negating factors that are naturally manifested in the perceptions of the observer, the paradoxical effect causes natural phenomena to be intermingled with cognitive paradoxes for their localized views and thus would always render as wonders under different delusionary circumstances. These wonders are rendered in their complexly inversed illusions that are caused by their cognitive paradoxes and therefore they are counterintuitive, mysterious, confusing and paradoxically misleading.

See UVS topics on "Critiques of scientific method - The cognitive paradox fallacies" that elaborates on how we could simply be misled by some deeply rooted hard-core beliefs, and "The genesis" that elucidates on the natural causality of cognitive negation.

In the UVS worldview, the paradoxical effect of nature is as a result of a universal unisonal vortex mechanism that negates to cause the delusionary circumstances to manifest for the perception of the observer; this is the causality for all sorts of misleading natural paradox. In inertial reference frames of localized perception, the effects of natural delusion were vortically caused by resonated manifestation of aether vortical motion, this is with conservation of energy in a synergistic of centripetal force and centrifugal forces for exchanging of angular momentum in the inviscid medium on two primary axes within a vortically push-in geometrical gravity field. The vortically coalesced viscous matters were vortically driven to harmonically precess in a wobbling spin of resonated vortical motion with all sorts of differential rotation that could render the cognitive negations to create the delusionary circumstances in their localized perceptions. The paradoxical effect of nature would cause cognitive paradoxes by negating the observation of natural phenomena to mysteriously render them in delusionary circumstances with all sorts of complexly inversed illusion. See UVS topics on "Optical illusions" that elaborates on the mechanism of some paradoxical illusions, "An apparently paradoxical universe" that illustrates on some known paradoxical illusions in natural phenomena that have been empirically observed and scientifically understood, "A flat world event" that elaborates on a transcendental level that could resolve its cognitive paradox, "differential rotations" that illustrates a cognitive negation and "Vortical universe model of UVS" that illustrates on natural nested spheroidal vortices from macrocosms to microcosms in the physical universe. See also external links on "Paradox" and "Cartesian doubt".

A mechanism of unisonal vortex The motion paradox of a spinning tetrahedral

When one looks into the night sky to observe celestial objects, everything observed are images of the past. The nearest celestial object is the image of the Moon that is about one plus second ago, the image of the Sun is about eight minutes and twenty seconds ago, the nearest star Proxima Centauri is an image of more than four years ago, the nearest spiral galaxy Andromeda is an image of approximately two and a half million years ago and a most distance galaxy Abell 1835 IR1916 observed is an image of more than thirteen billion years ago. In real time, all these celestial objects would have had moved to other spatial locations in their comoving distance according to their trajectories; they are not at the locations where they are paradoxically appearing to be. In nature, the observed optical phenomena in physical universe that are paradoxical in different manners and are rendered in complexly inversed illusions are aplenty.

See a UVS subtopic on “The cognitive paradox fallacy in cosmic inflation on accelerated expansion of space” that elaborates on how a cognitive paradox was resolved.

“Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better.” - Albert Einstein

Ironically, those revolutionary discoveries were not made directly through the understanding of the UVS model, which merely describes a hypothetical model with its universal mechanism of unisonal vortex that forms naturally occurred free vortex in nested vortical formations of a vortical paradigm. They were discovered by being enlightened intellectually in an awakened manner through knowing the paradoxical effect of nature that causes the circumstances of delusion; in an intellectual illumination it reveals the paradoxical illusions and this leads to immediate enlightenment with pristine clarity that has resolving capability for those mysterious natural phenomena. Through intellectual enlightenment with Universal Vortical Singularity to resolve cognitive paradoxes of nature, it had uncovered many types of hidden paradoxical effects that delusively rendered natural phenomena with all sorts of complexly inversed illusions; this process had solved the mysteries of many mysterious natural phenomena. Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of nature enlightens.

A paradoxical illusion

“Enlightenment on the paradoxical effect of nature enlightens.” - UVS inspired

The intellectual enlightenment experienced in its contemplating process, to put it in an analogy, is while one who is stumbling in the dark and is wandering in a focused attempt to diligently get out of the wood, then in unexpected lightning strikes those enigmatic scenarios on what the one was trying to figure out in the darkness are suddenly illuminated. In flashes these render visual clarity for the scenarios in contemplation, therefore those hard to figure out enigmatic scenarios that are optically negated in the darkness are vividly popped out visually at him in a sudden overall illumination momentarily, it thus renders a holistic view of the actual scenarios in pristine clarity and it could therefore trigger an explosion of discoveries. This manner of acquiring an essential knowledge that is required for breaking through is not deduced directly from engagement in a meticulous thinking and reasoning process, it is induced by enlightenment.

Lightning strikes

“The only real valuable thing is intuition.” - Albert Einstein

Intuition is a cognitive function that apparently has the ability to acquire knowledge without inference or the use of reason, it is the immediate apprehension of an issue without the intervention of any reasoning process. By diligently engaged in a synergy of inquiry and participating in the search or investigation, the knowledge induced by intuition in pristine awareness would have the element of surprise in an awakened state with a rush of jubilation in its enlightenment. By making inquiry rationally with proper preparation and has good intuition for its query on a mysterious natural phenomenon, it could lead to the intellectual enlightenment that would resolve its cognitive paradox to solve the mysteries of the natural phenomenon.

“The awakening from delusion is enlightenment.” - UVS inspired

To understand how the revolutionary discoveries were made, you should try out this intellectual enlightenment experience yourself, begin by understanding the "UVS model" and "Unisonal vortex mechanism". Be enlightened on these first, and then practice it on those mysterious natural phenomena with resolved cognitive paradoxes so as to understand the paradoxical effect of nature that causes all sorts of delusionary circumstances. The awakening from a delusion is enlightenment; awakened from a delusion is enlightening.

This is an essential intellectual process for enlightenment on those mysterious natural phenomena, where observations have had appeared to be mysterious as a result of their cognitive paradoxes that render the complexly inversed illusions, this could shed light in an intellectual manner based on the UVS model to illuminate on dark enigmatic areas. The purpose of the process is to deal with cognitive paradoxes of nature that appear to defy resolution for which no convincing diagnosis has been found for the problems presented. After resolving a cognitive paradox, and at the moment of being snapped out of its delusion in its awakening, it could resolve the misconception. Thereafter, other apparently related mysterious natural phenomena could be further explored in a logical reflecting manner by addressing their paradoxical effects for resolving their cognitive paradoxes through comparative analysis in a paradigm of vortical singularity that is scalable with the UVS model.

“Through knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, it enlightens on
how nature does wonders in a complexly inverse manner.” - UVS inspired

Being enlightened with UVS has an awakening effect on how nature could delusively render those natural phenomena in a complexly inverse manner by realizing the paradoxical effect of nature that could resolve all sorts of cognitive paradox, and knows the shortcomings in ourselves that would cause misconceptions for the observations of natural phenomena. This has led to revelation for different types of unisonal vortex and its vortrex in different forms with different types of viscous matter, uncovered one by one through unfolding the secrets in related natural phenomena that evidently leads from one to another in the comparative studies with the UVS model. It has also led to the qualitative research in "Solar system alignment effect", "Cyclonic gravity field effect" and "Unisonal evolution mechanism", and with these it has then resolved many more cognitive paradoxes in other vortically related mysterious phenomena of nature. In a qualitative evaluation approach for analyzing the vortical phenomena of nature and by enhancing clarity in a transcendental manner through inductive analyses with the UVS model, it meticulously develops and refines the UVS worldview for the entire physical universe on how it works as a single system in macrocosm and microcosm with a unisonal vortical motion.

Although the basic principles of unisonal vortex mechanism could be easily understood, the fundamental concept in its paradoxical effect can be extremely difficult to grasp. This experience is similar for anyone trying to see the 3D illusionary image in a stereogram picture and is not familiar on how to view it. The more one tries to see the hidden image in a way he is usually accustomed to when looking at things, the more he could not get it at all no matter how hard he tries. It has to be tuned-in by focusing in an unusual and unfamiliar manner (e.g. using the "Single Finger Method" to induce a cross-eyed vision), then magically the hidden 3D image would appear when the cross-eyed vision or wide-eyed vision is naturally organized on the 2D pictorial. Image on right has a stereogram of a 3D counterclockwise vortex and its harmonic vortices that are pointed toward the viewer. For beginner, please enlarge the image for easier viewing and it is recommended to use the "Single Finger Method" for visualizing the optical illusion. After getting the hang for using the "Single Finger Method", one can view those very fascinating animated stereograms in an apparent effect of three-dimensional optical illusion without using any 3D glasses, some of these animated stereograms are "Helical wave patterns" and "Standing wave patterns".

Stereogram of vortical patterns.

There are joys in finding things out, it would be an amazing experience when you know how a natural wonder has worked while in an awakened stage of enlightenment. It is mesmerizing to learn from nature, which could wake up all you cells that drives you to dig up every information to understand any related working principles, and turn every stone to find answers that links to evidence supporting or against a discovery. In any initial exploration for a vortically related natural phenomenon, evaluate the discovery in a meticulous manner with the UVS model to form a hypothesis, but apply necessary discretion to check if it survives all reasonable probes rigorously for cogency and also discreetly avoid the pitfalls of self-fulfilling prophecy. After getting the hang of it, perhaps, you might be able to make new discoveries with this ground-breaking model of Universal Vortical Singularity in an entirely new field of your expertise or whatsoever study you aspires on.

“We wish to find the truth, no matter where it lies. But to find the truth we need imagination and skepticism both.
We will not be afraid to speculate, but we will be careful to distinguish speculation from fact.” - Carl Sagan

For the discovery of Archimedes' Principle, a breakthrough was made while Archimedes was taking a bath, he noticed that the level of the water in the tub rose as he got in, and realized that this effect could be used to determine the volume of the crown for a task he has undertaken at then. For practical purposes water is incompressible, so the submerged crown would displace an amount of water equal to its own volume. By dividing the weight of the crown by the volume of water displaced, the density of the crown could be obtained, this was a previously intractable problem. Archimedes is said to have been so eager to share his realization that he leapt out of his bathtub and ran through the streets of Syracuse naked in a rush of jubilation proclaiming "Eureka!". Notice how the breakthrough idea had popped into his awareness in an instance on a subtle hint that is usually overlooked in a common everyday event.

“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” - Albert Einstein

The reality of a natural phenomenon with paradoxical effect is usually not conceivable directly. Nature did what nature does, and what we thought nature was doing as apparently observed is often complexly inversed from what nature was doing in a phenomenon that was paradoxically rendered. What we have believed as a truth of nature is one issue, what is the truth is another issue. Under paradoxical circumstances, when interpreting the realities of a natural phenomenon as observed, we would always be fooled by our preconceived ideas that are construed with our inherent shortcomings. Nature through its paradoxical effect would always cause such phenomenon to be counterintuitive for the localized observer; the realities for such natural phenomena are always hidden in cognitive paradoxes that would negate our perception to mislead us. Our awareness with preconceived ideas in fixed mindset is usually focused to only see what we have subconsciously prepared to accept, hence we are always misled by the paradoxical effect.

See an awareness test video clip to understand how something so distinct within the field of direct vision can be completely overlooked right in front of our nose. See also an excerpt from "Cargo Cult Science" by Richard Feynman.

* A small opaque object when is held right in front of a telescope directly blocking a distant object in the line of sight, the view magnified thirty times or more through this astronomy telescope focused on the distant object will still have a complete image of the magnified distant object that is slightly dimmer than usual in its field of view, this is without seeing the opaque object blocking the distant view. Take a lean backward and look at the lens of the eye piece and then the blocking object in front of the distant object could be seen. In peripheral vision through the telescope at a different optical wavelength that has magnified and focused on the distant object, the near object blocking in the line of sight in front of this mono vision telescope is like transparent that the distant object can be seen through the optically hollow out blockage.

Reflector telescope

“The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” - Albert Einstein

Always examine ourselves inward, the shortcomings such as flaws and limits are absolutely within us. As a result of our limited bandwidths in many aspects, many physical realities of nature are not apparent to us. Don't be stubborn with our established concepts or ideas against nature, don't condition our thought with our wish for how nature should be doing it, don't confine the abilities of nature in our thoughts, don't be denial with what nature is revealing to us, don't be impatient when fathoming a natural phenomenon and don't be ego. The hardest part is with the egoistic attitude in us that would hold us from truly letting go all these bad habits and preconceived ideas, it would block us from any opportunity at all for resolving the cognitive paradox of any natural phenomenon that is paradoxically rendered; this would negate our intuition to prevent us from being able to understand the paradoxical effect at all. Any of such hard-core behaviors could only lead us to visualize any natural phenomenon with a confirmation bias from its localized point of view, caused by how we have anticipated a preferred outcome for satisfying our belief. Thus, we would end up dwelling inside a paradoxical realm and believe that everything is thoroughly investigated, fully covered and correctly understood, and in such illusions of knowing we can perpetually fool ourselves in the delusion.

“The only true wisdom is knowing you know nothing.” - Socrates

The more we think we know in anything, the least we would explore outside our established understanding at the ease of our comfort zone and the more hindrance we would have when fathoming a concerned natural phenomenon.

To fathom any natural phenomenon with the UVS model, all other preconceived concepts have to be trashed out until we are hollowed out enough so as to become receptive for new ideas without prejudice, so that we can visualize and accept any underlying reality of nature that could be entirely different from what was firmly believed. This is no mean feat for our ego needs to be tamed and properly dealt with, and when trying to really let go any deeply rooted hard-core belief in a disbelief, one might emotionally undergo extreme traumatic mental experiences, such as stress, denial, depression, disillusioned and felt lost; it can be very agonizing to face a total collapse of our hard-core belief.

“The first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the easiest person to fool.” - Richard Feynman

When fathoming any mysterious phenomenon of nature with the UVS model, the first principle is that we must not fool ourselves, the next thing is to be so humble and becomes hollowed out in preparedness and know that we are ignorance of it. In the contemplating process, have integrity and be absolutely honest with ourselves on any finding, without a slightest attachment to our thoughts on any finding, have perseverance and stay focused. Put our preconceived ideas aside and free our imagination, surrender our rigid mind to our intuition, do not expect anything but be opened to everything including contradictions, and be malleable, then let the imagination go, let it flow and let it show.

“Nature could render us the insights only when we are hollowed out in preparedness
and has become truly humble with a pure intention to know.” - UVS inspired

The humility required to subdue our egoism is not attained through the act of consciously cared behaviors to show that we are very humble; this would not suffice. To be truly humble for contemplating on natural phenomena with a pure intention to know, it needs internalized cultivation. This requires us to recognize and know that our hindrances and shortcomings are caused by our inherent limits, and honestly acknowledge that inherently we are cognitively negated ignorant fools when pitching with nature. Misconception would inherently occur when we try to comprehend by means that have limited bandwidth in a spectrum to interpret a natural phenomenon that has a constituency of immeasurable frequency spectrums, and not knowing what exactly is referenced to.

“Once we accept our limits, we go beyond them.” - Albert Einstein

To understand a mysterious natural phenomenon in the UVS worldview, its counterintuitive issues have to be brought to a clear transcendental cognitive awareness, we have to be able to vividly imagine it, feel it, participate in it and then becomes oneness with it by immersing into it intellectually and interacts with it to understand it intuitively; the key is to find ways to interact with nature to understand the working mechanism by resolving its cognitive paradox.

“Instead of dwelling on reasons for there is no way through, always find for the way through.” - UVS inspired

See a UVS topic on "Do an interactive experiment to understand the effects of torque-free precession" that illustrates some examples to intuitively understand some paradoxical effects of nature.

Based on the UVS model, when the perception of a mysterious natural phenomenon in contemplation is naturally and gradually organized in a coherent flow, in a pristine clarity with transcendental visualization and understanding, we could be amazingly enlightened unexpectedly by an intellectual spark that resolves the cognitive paradox of the natural phenomenon.

Through knowing the paradoxical effect of nature, and based on the UVS model, intellectual enlightenment on mysterious natural phenomena begets. In the pristine clarity, the resolving capability for a mysterious natural phenomenon is simply amazing when it is illuminated by the intellectual enlightenment of Universal Vortical Singularity.

“A paradoxical universe requires intellectual enlightenment to explore the uncharted.” - UVS inspired

The illusion of knowing and the illusion of having control

Without knowing the triggering mechanism and the causes for ambiguities in a paradox, we could be misled and therefore derive or follow sophisticated theories that were developed based on misconceptions. In a delusion with faith established on illusion of knowing, and egoism brewing from illusion of having control, in a state of serenity embracing the delusion as an unshakable belief with circular reasonings in a stubborn manner swearing by it, we can perpetually fool ourselves.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity;
and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

It was speculated that since ancient time, just before a natural disaster would occur, some animals and insects seem to know it in advance and at a same time all of them would dash out from their hideouts and run for safety. More recently, it was well documented that just before the Boxing day Tsunami had struck, many elephants at different locations in Sri Lanka and Thailand had acted in a strange but synchronized manner and went uphill, their acts had also saved the life of many other people and their gratified keepers. In contemplating the reasons for this phenomenon, the majority of people in metaphoric thinking had believed beyond doubt that the elephants have "sixth sense", as in some kind of out of the world supernatural ability with a mystical type of connection among the elephants that is physically inexplicable.

See a news report on "Tsunami Animals: A Sixth Sense?".

However, before an earthquake or when a Tsunami has initiated, it is known that the Earth or sea would rumble with low frequencies. It is now known that these vibrations though are inaudible to the human ears, can be thunderous roars of nature for some creatures. This therefore could trigger a synchronized reactions for these creatures to run for their life, this can probably be triggered by fear imbued in their evolved instinct, passed down from their predecessors through preserved gene mutation of those that possibly had survived past calamities of such events.

The manner without a solid basis with clear definitions one can quickly crank up a not falsifiable theory for explaining any mysterious phenomenon that is inexplicable by common sense can mask ignorance, in an illusion of knowing it has the comfort of being at ease, this can also boost confidence with a sense of superiority in an illusion of having control. This is a propositional fallacy of affirming the consequent to assert the mythical belief; see how easily human mind can be steered in a delusion with an inclination towards a belief that has a higher order type of abstract explanation that loops in circular reasoning?

There are lots of busted myths for old and new ones alike, however, human psychology tends to hold firmly onto believing in myths.

“You can't convince a believer of anything;
for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe.” - Carl Sagan

“By denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.” - Galileo Galilei

See Paya the elephant painter in a video clip that had demonstrated unbelievable intelligence through an amazing feat of "self-portrait" painting of a three-dimensional tuskless elephant with well-thought-out plans. See also video clips of Paya drawing other paintings and other painter elephants doing portrait and still-life paintings: Elephant painter video clip 1, Elephant painter video clip 2, Elephant painter video clip 3, Elephant painter video clip 4, Elephant painter video clip 5, Elephant painter video clip 6, Elephant painter video clip 7, Elephant painter video clip 8, Elephant painter video clip 9, Elephant painter video clip 10 and there are more.

A California wildfire - The burn of the century
Al Nino effect was blamed for a California wildfire that had raged for weeks and reduced everything to ashes in its wake, in the disaster thousands of houses were lost and many firefighters were among those who have perished in this burn of the century, the event was officially termed as "Act of God".

A scientific investigation suggests there was a more fundamental cause that thus had evolved into this fire monster.

In relentless efforts for decades, human have seemed to be able to overcome nature for its spontaneous wildfires, this was by enforcing legislation with strict measures to suppress all fires quickly, made efficient with evolving technologies to effectively control their spread. However, the successful measures for decades had resulted in massive cumulation of combustible materials, heavily stacked by fallen branches, leaves and the likes, layers over layers ladened on over the years. With the arrival of Al Nino effect affecting climate in a perfectly prepared situation, and with a cue that could be initiated by a lightning strike, the forest was burned in huge towering flames that were never witnessed before in wildfire history. This wildfire could not be effectively suppressed, had raged for weeks relentlessly and in its grandeur scale everything the community had guarded for decades were all helplessly up in smokes.

The firefighters thought they knew every aspect of fire, they didn't. In all those years they thought they have the situations under control, that was also an illusion. For this case, it took the awe of nature for us to wake up from this cognitive paradox of our delusion, and realize the real culprit for this burn of the century; our ignorance.

“Nature is relentless and unchangeable, and it is indifferent as to whether
its hidden reasons and actions are understandable to man or not.” - Galileo Galilei

“The illusion of knowing in a delusion is apparently real in its cognitive paradox.” - UVS inspired

Some resonated remarks received that are relevant to Universal Vortical Singularity (aka UVS) on "The paradoxical effect of nature":

“I can hardly wait for you to enlighten the world to a new way of seeing the dynamics of Reality.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 17th Oct 2010.

“I once again thank you for being the one that pushed me over the edge from the realm of "Substance", to the realm of "Motion". Studying all the religions, Sciences of Mind , and Sciences of Substance, could not do it for me. Instead it took your theory of the "Vortex" to enlighten me to the fact that it is a, "NON-Substance Something", that is the creator of "Form" and thus, the Universe.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 16th Feb 2010.

“An intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!” - Dr. Wayne Nowland, physicist, researcher, philosopher & author of Interdimensional Science & Philosophy, planned and launched Australia's first communications satellite system, Dec 2009.

“Objectively speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging problem.”, “With great respect, Vladimir.” - Dr. Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician, accomplished engineer, author of "Prime Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy", "Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books such as "Metallurgical Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science and holds over fifty U.S. and foreign patents, 28th Jun 2009.

“Vincent I think I finally got you; the whole universe is twisted!” - Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum), 2008.

“OH boyohboyohboy ... Consciousness of natural event, paradoxical from the beginning, paradoxical from reasoning, paradoxical from rationalization, paradoxical from depiction, and on and on the paradoxes go .... even when we say consciousness ends the paradox is it does not, so there will be then ... what? Paradoxes for it all?” - Graham Burnett (aka G_burnett of TOEQuest Forum), 2008.

“It is funny how I did not see it before, the out right dominance of the Vortex phenomena. All the endless studying I have done on so many subjects to do with science, and the best I could see was, spin. Now I see vortices in every thing I see. Its amazing how one can miss something so important. It is great to once again see the workings of the Universe with new eyes.” - Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum), 10th Apr 2008.

~ With thanks to melanie of TOEQuest Forum for her post that links to a video clip on "Paya the elephant painter".

References and links:
Universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Epistemic theories of truth - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sunrise - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Perceptions - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centripetal force - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Centrifugal forces - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Cartesian doubt - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Moon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sun - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proxima Centauri - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Andromeda - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abell 1835 IR1916 - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comoving distance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Optical phenomenon - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Understanding - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intellectual - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intuition - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Inference - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific model - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nature - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stereogram - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Macrocosm and microcosm - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Single Finger Method by Magic Eye, Inc.
Self-fulfilling prophecy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archimedes' Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Eureka - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Confirmation bias - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Comfort zone - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Boxing day Tsunami; Elephant - HarperCollins Publishers Australia
Tsunami Animals: A Sixth Sense? - By FoxNews
Affirming the consequent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wildfire - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lightning animation - Prince Adrien
Wobbling spheres animation - ThinkQuest Library
Image of vortex stereogram - Mitch Waite Books
Image of an asian elephant - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Image of forest fire - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Paya the elephant painter in a video clip - Youtube by ExoticWorldGifts
Elephant painter video clip 1 - Youtube by elephantartaeacp
Elephant painter video clip 2 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 3 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 4 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 5 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 6 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 7 - Youtube by ElephantArtist
Elephant painter video clip 8 - Youtube by girLINtranslation
Elephant painter video clip 9 - Youtube by sainamthip
Elephant painter video clip 10 - Youtube by sainamthip

The Emperor's New Clothes - www. mindfully.org; An Anderson's tale

A millenniums-old circular logic - "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?"

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? This circular logic has been explored from all angles with all definitions by all cultures in all ways of looking at it through all great minds with over at least twenty-five centuries of debates, the puzzle was thought as could never be solved at all. There was a belief that if the experts cannot solve it, then no one else could.

Chickens hatch from eggs, but eggs are laid by chickens, making it difficult to say which originally gave rise to the other. To ancient philosophers, the question about the first chicken or egg also evoked the questions of how life and the universe in general began. - Excerpt from Wikipedia on "The chicken or the egg".

Based on a concept of evolution in modern knowledge, through inductive reasoning that macroevolution happens and new animal species were evolved; whatever laid the egg that had hatched into a first distinct chicken, that whatever was not a chicken by specific definition. The answer to this question according to its specifications, egg definitely had come first before the first chicken could be hatched. Specifically, this egg with an embryo of a chicken that had hatched into a first chicken was not an egg of chicken. There is a specific difference between the non-chicken egg and a chicken egg; i.e. chicken egg is laid by chicken.

We could never be able to travel back in time to exactly find this out, but this should not be a reason to falsify the concept that had fathomed a definite answer by inductive reasoning based on the theory of evolution supported with overwhelming evidence; the focus should be on the question that was written in specific terms. Nature doesn't involve in what or how those animal species were defined by the experts to make it convenient for isolation studies.

See external links on "Evolution" and "Darwin's Finches" that elaborates on the sympatric speciation in some passerine birds, and a video presentation on "David Attenborough on Darwin".

The problems of the chicken and egg issue were caused by the ambiguity in the definitions, they were used in a mixed up way to deny any answer in circular manners; the problems were caused by fallacies of definition. The ways the chicken and egg issue were probed are also very questionable; abstract reasonings in circular logic were used just to deny any answer so as to sustain the belief for whatsoever reasons that the puzzle could not be solved. It did block all the bad answers with loose points, but it has blocked all answers entirely to an extend that there is no point in trying to attempt any answer at all under such rhetorical refutes in abstractness. At any point of an argument, to falsify an answer, any mean that could be used, would be used against any answer by contradicting it, often they were with incompatible references, be it the concept of evolution itself, an established knowledge or hypothesis, an excerpt from a holy book, any philosophy, and even ambiguity of the definitions were also used; these evaluation were carried out on illogical basis fenced up with selective rules to critically suppress any answer by denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent.

It is illogical to expect a definite answer to be consistence when the questions are put forth in opposite ways with ambiguous definitions on the chicken and egg issue; it could never have a definite answer to the non-consistent question. It is illogical to think that by cracking this chicken and egg sequence it should also be able to find the answer for “how life and the universe in general began”, and hence has expected the answer to be something that is more sophisticated and complex. Attached to this notion, simple straight answer that does not fit the bracket would not even be considered as authentic with such fixed mindset.

Even by changing the definitions in any way for this issue, it would still have a precedent and therefore would still have a definite answer to it; an egg laid by a chicken is a chicken egg is regardless of whatever it hatches into. Therefore if the question goes “Which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?”, then the definite answer is chicken had to come first; this is a logically valid answer to the specifically defined question from the platform of evolutionism.

It is true that “At no point was a ‘chicken egg’ created from a distinct ‘non-chicken’ species”, but this argument that was used to refute the answer was non sequitur. A “non-chicken” of course could not have laid a “chicken egg”, the conclusion was unrelated and could not conclude egg did not come first. In a bewildering manner it merely confuses the issue by contradicting it with a valid argument that does not address the issue at all; this is a red herring fallacy of ignoratio elenchi. Note: The argument on “At no point was a ‘chicken egg’ created from a distinct ‘non-chicken’ species” had been removed from an earlier version of "The chicken or the egg?" article from Wikipedia.

With lame logic and moot reasoning that asserts ambiguity, we have consistently confused and fooled ourselves with the chicken and egg issue.

References and links:
The chicken or the egg - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Macroevolution - The TalkOrigins Archive
Theory of evolution - Conservapedia, The Trustworthy Encyclopedia
Evolution - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Darwin's Finches - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sympatric speciation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Fallacies of definition - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Denying the antecedent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Affirming the consequent - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Non sequitur - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ignoratio elenchi - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Video of David Attenborough on Darwin - By Nature Video
Image of chicken and egg - www.youpolls.com

Enlightenment on natural phenomena based on the model of Universal Vortical Singularity Enlightenment on CMBR dipole Enlightenment on galaxy clusters Enlightenment on structure of a galaxy Enlightenment on black hole and dark matter Enlightenment on evolution of stars and galaxies Enlightenment on vortical patterns of planetary nebulae Enlightenment on sunspots Enlightenment on gas and dust tails of comet Enlightenment on planetary rings Enlightenment on vortices of Jupiter Enlightenment on geometrical structure of magnetosphere Enlightenment on aurora Enlightenment on polar vortex Enlightenment on jet streams Enlightenment on clear air vortex and bow echo Enlightenment on tidal bore and tidal wave Enlightenment on Ozone Hole Enlightenment on ice Age Enlightenment on tropical cyclone (Hurricane) Enlightenment on Tornado Alley Enlightenment on dust devil and dust storm Enlightenment on supercell, tropical storm & thunderstorm Enlightenment on Bermuda Triangle Enlightenment on earthquake and volcano eruption Enlightenment on crater and volcano Enlightenment on Tunguska event Enlightenment on lightning Enlightenment on geometrical structure of an atom Enlightenment on expanding physical universe Enlightenment on cyclonic gravity field effect Enlightenment on Solar System alignment effect The genesis Unisonal evolution mechanism The model of Universal Vortical Singularity The fundamental of Unisonal Vortex Mechanism Qualitative predictions of Universal Vortical Singularity Complexly inversed illusions of nature Revolutionary discoveries of Universal Vortical Singularity CMBR dipole Galaxy cluster Dark matter Black hole Galaxy Globular cluster Stellar jets Protoplanetary disk Planetary nebula Heliosphere Sunspots Corona loops Gas tail of comet Planetary rings Cloud bands Magnetosphere Aurora Ozone hole Polar vortex Jet streams Tropical cyclone Tornado Supercell Dust devil Clear air vortex Oceanic whirlpool Crater Earthquake Lightning Structure of atom The Genesis Unisonal evolution mechanism Effects of Solar System alignment Cyclonic gravity field effect Time dilation reviewed with UVS UVS resolves the concept of gravity M-M experiment reviewed with UVS Bermuda Triangle Ancient concepts of universe

The vortex legacy of Albert Einstein - From the perspective of Universal Vortical Singularity

Albert Einstein had pursued relentlessly throughout his life in an attempt to find and develop a concept based on theoretical physics in a single model to explain all fundamental interactions of nature, supposedly this was to fully explain and link together in a single universal model for all known physical phenomena in the physical universe. The philosophy of science advocated by Einstein, with logical empiricism blending scientific realism in a holism, was expressed in a distinct statement as quoted below.

“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” - Albert Einstein

See a UVS topic on "Logic and belief systems" that elaborate on the above statement of Einstein, see also external links on "Einstein's Philosophy of Science" and “Four centuries of conflicts”. Although the rotational frame-dragging effect based on spacetime curvature concept in Einstein's theory of general relativity (GR) had rationally explained and could mechanically account for the force dynamics of tropical cyclone, supercell, tornado and the likes (Asserted in the light of unisonal vortex mechanism and cyclonic gravity field effect, rotational frame-dragging is a cyclonic effect that is caused by geometric gravity of a rotating celestial spheroid.), this theory represented by Einstein was falsified by the consensus of his peers led by meteorologists of top ranks and files. Thereafter, any attempt nowadays to theorize on lower latitude atmospheric vortices with this rotational frame-dragging effect as a result of Earth's rotation with the fabric of spacetime that twists like a vortex would be canonically refuted. From the UVS perspective, the rotational frame-dragging effect with its equivalence principle based on spacetime concept is a valid theory in place of Coriolis effect, it has qualitatively accounted for an exchange of angular momentum that in differential rotation it causes the perpetual momentum to cyclonically drive an atmospheric vortex on lower latitude.	Tropical Cyclone	Tornado
	Supercell	Unisonal vortex

Einstein's general theory of relativity (GR, geometric theory of gravitation) in a simplest platform is consistent with the experimental data that are accurate in cosmology models, it accurately quantifies galactic gravity of a whirling galaxy in perpetual motion; stars revolves around a black hole and interacts relatively with one and another in metric tensor of their gravitational fields in a geometry of space and time. GR with equivalence principle as the fundamental background concepts discreetly correlates as a spacetime vortex model.

Bode's galaxy M81

Black hole

Space-time vortex

“There is no space empty of field.” - Albert Einstein

Evidently, the young Einstein was already familiar with the vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz, this renowned physicist had contributed to the knowledge of thermodynamics, electrodynamics, the studies for vortex motion in fluids and he was also known for conservation of energy. In August 1899 Einstein mentioned "I admire ever more the original, free thinker Helmholtz". At the age of fifteen Einstein wrote his first scientific work, "The Investigation of the State of Aether in Magnetic Fields", and he had incorporated the concept of aether discreetly into his later research in "Einstein æther theory" as a scalar field (spacetime continuum is ether-like) and accounts for the cause of geometric gravity with a cosmological constant (aka dark energy) of negative pressure. At then, the aether hypothesis of Christiaan Huygens and the "Carteisan Cosmology" founded with "Theory of Vortices" by Rene Descartes had been rejected on the basis that empty space is void of aether by Newton's Principia, this was further substantiated with the famous Michelson-Morley experiment (1887) that there was no aether wind and this conclusion could not be rejected. Presumably, Einstein therefore could not officially agree with the existence of luminiferous aether.

Electromagnetic field is categorically not a physical object, yet this masslessness phenomenon of nothingness could exert physical pressure on physical objects in its path. See external links on electromagnetic spectrum and electromagnetic radiation that elaborates on how energy and momentum in electromagnetic field could interact with matter.

See an external link on "Vortex dynamics" that elaborates on the vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz and a UVS topic on "Michelson-Morley experiment reviewed with UVS".

"Michelson and Morley in 1887 designed an experiment, which employed an interferometer and a half-silvered mirror, that was accurate enough to detect aether flow. The mirror system reflected the light back into the interferometer. If there were an aether drift, it would produce a phase shift and a change in the interference that would be detected. However, given the results were negative, rather than validating the aether, based upon the findings aether was not confirmed. This was a major step in science that eventually resulted in Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity." - Excerpt from Wikipedia on Lorentz transformation.

Many in the Newtonian era who had openly held the proposition that aether exists, or any concept implying a universal medium that pervades the physical universe, were either prosecuted, discredited, pushed aside or simply left high and dry by depriving them from institutional resources. Iconic characters whom had received such treatments include Rene Descartes, Nikola Tesla, Walter Russell, Hannes Alfven and others. Maxwell equations were originally based on aether as a mechanical model, the original idea for Lorentz transformation was also based on aether that describes it like a Doppler effect. Apparently, these theologians were tactically forced to abandon the concept of aether-filled space and subsequently their theories were reformed in mathematical constructs with different concepts of space that are void of aether. Newton rejected the aether hypothesis of Christiaan Huygens and the Descartes' aether "vortex theory" of planetary motion, even the later published Newton's aether model was deliberated as flawed and was therefore rejected. In that classical physics era, if Einstein did not morph aether as spacetime, his theory of relativity would probably be completely rejected as well.

See external links on "Rene Descartes' Theory of Vortices", "Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity", "Space and the Hydrogen Age" by Walter Russell and "Plasma cosmology" of Hannes Alfvén.

“It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction.” - Albert Einstein

In the classical physics era when aether does not exist was the consensus, Einstein had relentless searched for a theory of the physical universe based on a single scientific model, against all odds he probably had discreetly moved in the opposite direction of mainstream science with his spacetime vortex model, published as the general theory of relativity in 1915 it had then began the era of modern physics. In line with the scientific consensus that aether does not exist, he either had thought that space and time are distorted by gravitational forces of celestial objects as propositioned with his geometric gravity concept, or in another likely scenario that in circumspection he ingeniously had played with the duality of nature by introducing equivalence principle as the background concept of GR. In stealth he had thus established his spacetime vortex model in a paradoxical manner that conforms with non-existence of aether.

“The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources.” - Albert Einstein

See a UVS topic on "Four-dimensional spacetime continuum in mathematical construct for sound wave in a vector space void of medium". See also external links on "Einstein–Hilbert action" in a significant event for physics in November 1915 that had led to the current definition for spacetime in mathematical relativism, and an address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden by Albert Einstein on "Ether and the Theory of Relativity" that was rejected by his peers.

In the address delivered on May 5th, 1920, in the University of Leyden, Einstein categorically mentioned "Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether. According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time". He also categorically mentioned space is his measuring rod (invariant) and time is his measuring clock (invariant). In GR where aether was supposedly swapped with absolute space or absolute time, an ambiguity in circular logic would occur in linguistic manner and when aether was treated as an invariant scalar field therefore Einstein further mentioned "this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.".

“... space without ether is unthinkable;” - Albert Einstein, on May 5th, 1920.

Seemingly, Einstein had held the belief that aether exists throughout his research and this was never let up unlike it was generally believed that he had eventually abandoned the hypothesis of an aether-filled physical universe. Between a rock and a hard place with the consensus on non-existence of aether could not be rejected at then, Einstein could therefore have morphed aether as spacetime continuum, in an interchanged manner the invariant space or invariant time is swapped with invariant aether, and the variant aether is swapped with a variant spacetime continuum. In this ingenious manner Einstein had avoided the onslaught from mainstream with scientific consensus that was against any theory that propositioned the existence of aether.

“Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live.” - Albert Einstein

It was not like a third party trying to interpret what it meant by the term “spacetime” that was originally coined by Einstein, it was the author of "Theory of relativity" who had published his papers since 1905 through 1915, which had thus began the era of modern physics, and Einstein by himself, not through another party, after 1919 with the world famous initial successful test of general relativity, was trying to tell the world in 1920 with his definitions to clarify what he meant by spacetime.

“Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity,
I do not understand it myself anymore.” - Albert Einstein

The mathematical relativism of modern physics that posits the assumptions of variant space and variant time as its foundation, is a pseudoscience of nature. Any relativist who believes that space and time are variants, therefore the phenomena of transformations in relative motion of uniform velocity are physically real in symmetrical situation, symmetrical length contraction in special relativity (SR) is physical, gravitational field physically distorts space and time, active transformations of time for time dilation effect in SR and gravitation time dilation in GR are scientifically proven, and one-way travel into the future in forward time travel is physically possible, he just needs to investigate the explanation by Einstein on time dilation effect in SR for clarification. It is absolutely clear that time dilation effect in SR is merely an optical illusion of relative motion with uniform velocity in its symmetrical situation, and based on light propagation has limited speed in absolute space and time (one temporal dimension of time and three-dimensional Euclidean space), in an aether-filled physical universe, the other propositions of Einstein's theory of relativity that are related to time dilation could be coherently clarified without any contradiction.

See a UVS subtopic on "Reviews on time dilation effect in Einstein's special theory of relativity".

“A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.” - Albert Einstein

“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” - Albert Einstein

“You imagine that I look back on my life's work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is
not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track.”
- Albert Einstein, on his 70th birthday, in a letter to Maurice Solovine, 28 March 1949.

"In special relativity, the time dilation effect is reciprocal: as observed from the point of view of any two clocks which are in motion with respect to each other, it will be the other party's clock that is time dilated. ", "In the special theory of relativity, a moving clock is found to be ticking slowly with respect to the observer's clock. If Sam and Abigail are on different trains in near-lightspeed relative motion, Sam measures (by all methods of measurement) clocks on Abigail's train to be running slowly and, similarly, Abigail measures clocks on Sam's train to be running slowly.", "Symmetric time dilation occurs with respect to temporal coordinate systems set up in this manner. It is an effect where another clock is being viewed as running slowly by an observer. Observers do not consider their own clock time to be time-dilated, but may find that it is observed to be time-dilated in another coordinate system.". Excerpts from Wikipedia on "Time dilation" and in a section at "Time dilation is symmetric between two inertial observers".

Nonetheless, Einstein's universe was rhetorically refuted after Hubble's discovery on receding galaxies that consequently had rejected his cosmological constant by scientific consensus, also misled by illusions (See UVS topics on "Atmospheric polar vortex" and "Qualitative evaluation on time dilation".) in the manifold of cognitive paradoxes that are counterintuitive, therefore his theories could not be cut out in a single model from quantum levels to cosmic levels. Hitherto, the questions remain unanswered in modern physics on how general relativity could be reconciled with the laws of quantum physics to produce a complete and self-consistent theory for quantum gravity to unify gravity.

In the UVS worldview that is based on the UVS model, gravity is an isotropic push-in inertial of an aetheric medium in vortical motion. See UVS topics on "UVS resolves the GR concept of gravity" and "The geometrical structure of an atom" that elaborates on the causality of gravity.

“Quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory.” - Einstein's proposition

See external links on “Quantum vortices of Bose-Einstein condensates” and "EPR paradox" where it mentioned Einstein never accepted quantum mechanics as a "real" and complete theory for its "spooky action at a distance", struggling to the end of his life for an interpretation that could comply with relativity without complying with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. See external links on "Stop light experiment" and "'Tornadoes' Are Transferred From Light To Sodium Atoms" that demonstrates in an experiment on light (Electromagnetic radiation) interacting with matter, it elaborates on a new quantum physics technique and this can be used to manipulate Bose-Einstein condensates by transferred orbital angular momentum. This is essentially the same motion as air molecules in a tornado or a planet revolving around a star--from laser light to sodium atoms.


Intriguing philosophies of Einstein

Einstein was more famous for his formula E = mc², ironically this was most regretted by him at hindsight for bringing this knowledge of nuclear science to the world when it was not ready. Despite his contention on nuclear weapons should only be used for the sole purpose of maintaining deterrence for peace keeping of the world, his mass-energy equivalence concept and a letter to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had instrumented the development of atomic bomb in Manhattan Project that was eventually used against Japan in WWII. Although this had effectively ended WWII and relieved millions of people from the peril of this world war, he envisioned it has great consequences for the world in the manner nuclear weapons was handled.

“Peace cannot be kept by force. It can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

His peaceful nature and a very enlightening view on sustainable world peace and harmony for humanity in a universal perspective empirically had shown great empathy and compassion for all living beings, was expressed in the manner of a wake-up call as quoted above. See a UVS topic on "OWNER".

“The distinction between the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” - Albert Einstein

“A man must learn to understand the motives of human beings, their illusions, and their sufferings.” - Albert Einstein

Though Einstein with his mass-energy equivalence concept and special relativity had propositioned that the so called reality that was taken for granted is merely a persistent illusion, had he ever known how those complexly inversed illusions are caused by the paradoxical effect of nature and they are imbued in cognitive paradoxes occurring throughout the physical universe as explained with the UVS model, the scenarios today for natural science could have been more illuminated.

“Physical reality is merely a persistent illusion of vortical motion in the eternal now.” - UVS inspired

See UVS topics on "The genesis", "The UVS worldview", "Conceptual framework of nature", "Cosmic evolution of stars and galaxies based on UVS model" that evidently illustrates with a single vortical model on how all celestial objects in the physical universe are vortically coalesced into structural forms at macro levels, "Unisonal evolution mechanism" that illustrates with vortical modellings on how discrete structural forms are evolved and quantized from an all-pervasive universal medium, "The geometrical structure of an atom" that illustrates vortical interactions in subatomic scale.

A quest towards unity through a great awakening.
Dedicated to Albert Einstein, and also to all who had contributed for the quest towards unity, in searching for a unifying theory of everything (TOE) that is based on a single model.

2007

References and links:
Albert Einstein - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Philosophy of science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Logical empiricism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific realism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Holism - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's Philosophy of Science - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philopophy; SEP
Rotational frame-dragging effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Spacetime - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Coriolis effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Four centuries of conflicts - Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
General theory of relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Metric tensor - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Equivalence principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Space-time Vortex - SCIENCE@NASA
Electromagnetic field - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electromagnetic spectrum - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electromagnetic radiation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Momentum - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Matter - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Vortex theory of Hermann von Helmholtz - A history and philosophy of fluid mechanics By G. A. Tokaty
Conservation of energy - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Geometric gravity - Einstein online
Cosmological constant - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Negative pressure - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Theory of Vortices - CyberBrahma
Carteisan Cosmology - Standard encyclopedia of philosophy
Rene Descartes - New Science Theory
Newton's Principia - xtimeline
Michelson-Morley experiment - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Luminiferous aether - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ether vortex motion - new-science-theory.com
Vortex dynamics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lorentz transformation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Doppler effect - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Newton's aether model - Eric Baird
Theory of relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity - PESWiki.com
Space and the Hydrogen Age - By Walter Russell
Plasma cosmology - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bose-Einstein condensate - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Precession - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum vortices of Bose-Einstein condensates
EPR paradox - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Spooky action at a distance - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop light experiment - From Harvard University Gazette
'Tornadoes' Are Transferred From Light To Sodium Atoms - ScienceDaily
Electromagnetic radiation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Natural science - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classical physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Modern physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ether and the Theory of Relativity - The Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH)
Aether and general relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein's universe - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hubble's discovery on receding galaxies - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific consensus - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Modern physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum physics - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quantum gravity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gravity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Einstein–Hilbert action - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A significant event for physics in November 1915 - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Successful tests of general relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Pseudoscience - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Time dilation - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mass-energy equivalence - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A Letter from Einstein to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Manhattan Project - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Special relativity - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wobbling spheres animation - ThinkQuest Library
Helical wave patterns - From 3dWonderStuff
Standing wave patterns - From 3dWonderStuff
Animated artist impression of a spheroidal quantum vortex - Courtesy of Thomas Seifert by email
Artist impression of vortex - Really Slick Screensavers
Image of Bose-Einstein Condensates and Atom Lasers - Center for Quantum-Atom Optics

counter was reset on 02/02/2010

Disclaimers: The above revolutionary discoveries and conjectures based on an unheard-of hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity with radical ideas are unconventional, the explorations of the uncharted at fundamental stage might not be thoroughly covered, bound to have shortcomings, loose ends and errors, many details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated and proven. Many of the implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the topics presented, any term or statement if offensive in any manner or whatsoever is most regretted. Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Some web browsers were reported to have displayed with data corruption for text, disorganized images and some animations did not work, it is recommended to view the contents from UVS web pages with Windows Internet Explorer.

Copyright information: Images found in this website have been used with the express permission of the copyright holders. Wherever possible, direct credit to the origin of the image has been provided; any re-use requires the permission of the original copyright holder. In instances in which an image credit has not been given, the image is understood to be in the public domain, if this is believed not to be the case for any image, please advise with the proper credit information.