externally linked topics on "Grounded
Theory" that summarizes its purpose of theory
construction, a subtopic on "The
benefits of using grounded theory" that elaborates on the merits
with the inquiry method of grounded theory, a paper on "Visual
Grounded Theory" that elaborates on conducting research with
visual data. See also a Facebook wall on "Draw
Your Thoughts" on the outreaching for its
hardcopy book that elaborates on its visual analytic research methodology.
of this UVS grounded theory with its
philosophy of science[uvs], methodically induces
the visual resolutions[g]
for the actualities of the vortically demonstrated natural phenomena,
and thus could elucidate[d]
their naturally negated[d]
empirical observations. This is by elucidating[d]
their observational delusions[d],
which are being subliminally[d]
rendered in a typical obfuscated manner by the
paradoxical effect of the cosmos[uvs].
realizing the paradoxical effect of the cosmos, it enlightens on how natural
could be negated to render their delusions in a typical obfuscated manner.”
- UVS inspired -
paradigm shift, the research based on the UVS model for developing
is collectively grounded on its
epistemic process and methodology[uvs]
to induce the visual resolution on the
natural phenomena. These phenomena could be perceived to be enigmatically
demonstrating the nested
hyperspherical variants of the structurally transformed torus[w]
and their unisonal
The animation on right illustrates how a torus[w]
could transform. It shows as the distance to the axis of revolution
decreases, the ring torus becomes a horn torus, then a spindle torus,
and when the distance approaches zero, the torus will resemble a
torus structure. [s]
process is grounded for the hypothetical constructs of the natural
phenomena to ecludiate with their systematically explicated[d]
underlying structures and mechanisms.
And these constructs established for their visual inductive resolutions,
are coherently grounded
on the UVS
depicts nested unisonal vortices manifested in various forms of
nested torus structure.
the UVS topics on "The
structure of the observable universe" that illustrates
a postulated vortical paradigm for the macrocosms and the microcosms
of the observable universe, and “The
inspirations of Universal Vortical Singularity” for
the excerpts of some all-encompassing sculptural ideas that were
inspired in the UVS research.
illustration of a
unisonal vortex. [uvs]
A nested form of
visual inductive resolutions in the coherentism[w]
of the UVS research, are for perceiving the actualities of natural phenomena
in their subliminally negated observations. And with its transcendental
perspectivalism[w] coherently grounded on the
conceptual framework of UVS, it could methodically resolve the
inherent in the subliminally negated observations
of the natural phenomena.
visual inductive resolution of the UVS research for the apparently observed
natural phenomenon that enigmatically demonstrates vortical characteristics,
explicated with its five
Ws[w] on how it subliminally
manifests its delusional observation. It
explicates on who (the natural phenomenon)
and to whom it demonstrates the delusional observation, what
is the illusion, where does it negate, when
does it occur, and why is it delusional.
through analyses by inductive
reasoning[w] with the inferred
vortical structures[uvs] for perceiving enigmatic
natural phenomena with their UVS hypothetical constructs, and then by
invoking their transcendental[d]
perceptions in the conceptual framework of UVS to intuitively elucidate
on the actualities and thereof enlightens on their subliminally negated
circumstances, this epistemic process could thus resolve the natural cognitive
paradoxes of their delusional observations by abductive
the resolved cognitive paradoxes of the empirically observed natural phenomena,
this epistemic process thus reveals how such delusional observations are
being paradoxically rendered in their subliminally negated circumstances.
epistemic process in its
criteria of truth[uvs]
with the elucidated delusions to substantiate its theories
methodically resolves cognitive paradoxes
to develop their
from the UVS perspective, and thus explicates to theorize on the actualities
of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena.
elucidated delusions and resolved cognitive paradoxes, are the a
that were developed with its coherence
theory of truth[w]
in the UVS worldview
to explicate on the actualities of the empirically observed natural phenomena.
And with empirical
evidence[w] to substantiate the predications
in their correspondence
theory of truth[w], these propositions[w]
could be conclusively proven.
a nutshell, with these epistemic
theories of truth[w] applied in the UVS research,
they are the primary methodology to qualitatively evaluate the vortically
demonstrated natural phenomena of the entire observable universe throughout
and the microcosms[d].
appraise the efficacy[d]
of this UVS research methodology, sample these quite straightforward case
studies[w] that were construed with its visual
inductive resolutions: “The
axial precession of the Earth”, “The
nested polar vortex pair”, “Polar
jet stream”, “The
Antarctica Ozone Hole”, “Dust
vortices of Jupiter”, “Planetary
cluster”, and “The
Despite these natural phenomena have anomalies
problems in physics, the UVS research qualitatively resolved the physical
paradoxes of their conventional wisdom with its visual inductive resolutions
on their actualities, and they are substantiated with proofs or compelling
visual inductive resolutions of the UVS research that invoke their transcendental
perceptions with the underlying structures and mechanisms postulated[g]
for the vortically demonstrated natural phenomena, enlightens[d]
extensively. The resolving power for its resolutions on the actualities
of those paradoxically rendered natural phenomena, resolves explicitly.
with its hypothetical constructs construed from the perspective of the
UVS conceptual framework, is downright groundbreaking[d].
And the predictive
for its qualitative
explicated with the UVS predications on the actualities of the natural
phenomena, is outright revolutionary[d].
“By visualizing the underlying structures and mechanisms, it intuitively reveals
the actualities of the mysteriously rendered natural phenomena.”
- UVS inspired -
invariance[w] of UVS coherently pans out extensively
with numerous empirical observations of natural phenomena at many levels
from the macrocosms to the microcosms. Henceforth, in the
UVS worldview, with systemic syntheses[d]
of the evidently qualified UVS hypotheses, the UVS research collectively
synthesizes these hypotheses to augment[d]
in a nested positive feedback loop for its development as
with loads of empirical evidence that coherently and systematically substantiate
the propositional actualities of these natural phenomena, the UVS treatise
cogently offers a unifying way for perceiving how the entire observable
universe throughout the macrocosms and the microcosms works unisonally
as a single system.
the UVS topics on "The
structure of atom" that elaborates on vortical phenomena in the
microcosms for how they are vortically impelled by the macrocosms, "The
formation of stars and galaxies" that illustrates on how all
celestial objects are vortically coalesced in their macrocosms, "The
hyperspherical pushed-in gravity" that unifies the concept of
gravity in the macrocosms and the microcosms, and "Unisonal
evolution mechanism" that elaborates on vortical evolution for
how it begets existences from the macrocosms to the microcosms.
a nutshell, the above flow chart generally illustrates the
method of the UVS research.
listed below, the segmented approach that augments in a nested
positive feedback loop, constitutes as the overall epistemic
process and methodology of the UVS research:
epistemic process for developing the hypothetical
constructs of natural phenomena, is grounded on coherence
theory of truth[w] for its
visual grounded theory to postulate the underlying
structures and mechanisms of the empirical observations.
These hypothetical constructs are developed with the
reality paradigm shift of the UVS model for their
analyses in the perspectivalism of the UVS worldview.
This process coherently conceives the UVS hypothetical
constructs to invoke their transcendental perspectives
in the conceptual framework of UVS, and thus methodically
resolves the cognitive paradoxes of the natural phenomena
with the elucidations of their observational delusions.
epistemic process for developing the predications
of UVS in its worldview, is grounded on correspondence
theory of truth[w] for its
visual grounded theory to qualify these propositions.
These predications with the epistemological paradigm
shift of the UVS research, explicate the actualities
of the empirical observed natural phenomena with a
priori reasoning from the UVS perspective.
This process with the gathering of empirical evidence
to prove the UVS predications, verifies them in a
positive feedback loop to validate, reject, or refine
the predicated actualities.
epistemic process for developing the UVS treatise
as a theory of everything in physical cosmology, is
grounded on its epistemic
theories of truth[w] for
its visual grounded theory to systematically synthesize
the qualitatively proven or evidently qualified UVS
hypotheses. This process collectively synthesizes
the UVS hypotheses to augment in an overall positive
feedback loop, and thus coherently develops its theory
of everything by extending the UVS worldview.
the UVS topics on "The
philosophy of science of the UVS research" that elaborates
the transcendental perspectivalism of the UVS research,
criteria of truth for the UVS research" that elaborates
on a qualitatively refined scientific method, and "The
afterword of UVS" that elaborates on the inception
of the UVS research.
significance of the UVS research
methodically resolved cognitive paradoxes with its visual grounded
theory research for numerous paradoxically rendered natural phenomena.
unequivocally elucidated the actualities of empirically observed natural
phenomena throughout the macrocosms and the microcosms.
heuristically propositioned a concept of celestial mechanism that
is consistent as well as universally coherent.
critically falsified the Big Bang theory on its propositions for the
metric expansion of space and also the cosmic inflation.
rigorously demonstrated that the posit for time in modern physics
explicitly posited invariant space and time with a scientific model
on a neoclassical platform, and thus in its reality and epistemological
paradigm shifts, it eliminates the intuitively unthinkable paradoxes
in the abstracts of modern physics.
logically debunked the scientific consensus on the null hypothesis
of the Michelson-Morley experiment.
qualitatively unified the gravity phenomenon with the three other
fundamental interactions of nature.
coherently explicated cosmic evolution from the macrocosms to the
cogently illustrated how the entire observable universe throughout
the macrocosms and the microcosms works unisonally as a single system.
scientific revolution of the UVS research
the UVS research
emphasizes on the resolutions[g]
the UVS visual
inductive resolutions with their
elucidated observational delusions, had resolved numerous
natural cognitive paradoxes[g]
of the paradoxically rendered natural phenomena. And the
of these resolutions
could be applied to re-evaluate
those mainstream scientific
of the physical
are explicating on such natural phenomena with their
resolved natural cognitive paradoxes
can be efficaciously used to critically review
these scientific theories from their
and thus could elucidate the science delusions in their spurious[d]
what are going on in the empirically observed natural phenomena.
With the elucidated science delusions, these can resolve the misconceptions
of those fallacious mainstream scientific
mislead with the artificial cognitive paradoxes created in their scientific
the independent qualitative evaluations for reviewing the criteria
on which these scientific theories are based upon, their artificial
were thus meticulously resolved.
the artificial cognitive paradoxes of these fundamentally incorrect
scientific theories rendered
their physical paradoxes with their fallaciously contrived posits[g],
which have had thus resulted in their science delusions.
cognitive paradox fallacies[uvs]
in the fallaciously validated propositions of these mainstream scientific
theories, the informal
in their posits, and the formal
in their deductions, were thus addressed and resolved in their reviews.
reviews also elucidate on how the fallacious mainstream scientific theories,
were all speciously[d]
validated in their
the intrinsically flawed scientific
Critical analysis of the scientific method on its intrinsic flaws
a nutshell, with grounding in the discipline of epistemology[w],
this is a critique[w]
of the contemporary scientific
method[w] on its intrinsic[d]
critically analyzed the intrinsic aspects of its foundational
crisis[w], its fallacious criteria
and the science delusions[d]
it entails with all its possible constructs of physical
is generally believed that the prejudices[w]
like those stemmed from geocentrism in its science delusion, were events
of the past. Moreover, there is also a prevalent deep-rooted belief[w]
that we are now in a golden
age of physics[w],
realism[w] rules with impeccable[d]
It is asserted that all the scientifically established proofs with the
for their empirical observations, were accomplished with the well-established
scientific method of modern
science[w]; the claims of scientific proofs
for empirical observations were deemed to be rigorously tested and proven
with their repeatable scientific experiments. As such, any critical discrepancy
in the validated scientific
is deemed as must have had been eradicated.
if the basis of a scientific
theory[w] was established in a state of delusion[d],
with a natural cognitive paradox[g]
of its empirical observation, its first
principle[w] is fundamentally incorrect. It
therefore was developed based on its misconception in its paradoxically
negated circumstances, such as it is based on the fallacious posit[d]
Earth is the center of the universe[w], which
thus entails the science delusion for all its propositions[w].
first principle is that you must not fool yourself -
- and you are the easiest person to fool.”
- Richard Feynman
scientific theory that was misled by its natural cognitive paradox, could
be validated with its artificial cognitive paradox construed in the delusion
of its scientific construct. Such a scientific theory would render its
physical paradox with its foundational crisis.
is regardless of how developed, how profound, how logical, how coherent,
how consistent and precise the scientific theory is with its quantitative
analysis for its empirical observation. It is also regardless of how diversely
it has had been independently and successfully tested with repeatable
it is in its applied
science[w], and how broadly it has had been
peer reviewed and accepted by so many experts[w]
for a very long period of time.
the general principle of the contemporary scientific method, intrinsically
suffers its foundational crisis with its fallaciously endorsed posits
for developing scientific theories. In the delusions
with its confirmation
bias[w] for the empirical observations, its
peer-review process for validation[d]
has thus been construed with its fallacious criteria
of truth on
its outset. The general developments for such mainstream scientific theories
science[w] for natural phenomena, are thus being
construed with the physical paradoxes of their science delusions.
an externally linked topic "Foundational
crisis" that elaborates on the attempts to provide unassailable
foundations that were found to suffer from various paradoxes.
“The fallaciously endorsed posit of a scientific model,
is the mother of all its science delusions.”
- UVS inspired
With the resolved natural cognitive
epistemic theories of truth[w]
to evaluate the hallmark scientific theories,
the science delusions in their theories
were elucidated for numerous conventional
as on how they were fallaciously validated with their criteria of truth.
The developments for the hypothetico-deductive
models[w] of these scientific theories with
the application of the contemporary scientific method for pragmatic
theories of truth[w], literally ignored qualitative
evaluations on the posits of their hypothetical constructs. Such overemphasis
on deductive analyses with an extreme obsession on higher measurement
precisions for their quantitative predictions, would incognizantly entail
all possible forms of science delusions in mainstream physics[w]
with their fallacies
of misplaced concreteness[w].
of physics[w] that suffers foundational crisis
with its fallacious posit for its empirical observation, would paradoxically
distort its perception of reality[w].
This is despite its validated conclusions are analytically true, and can
also pragmatically work. And with its validated quantitative analyses
deduced by begging
the question[w] for its premises[w]
in its science delusion, it could paradoxically establish its deductive
conclusions that would be fallaciously reckoned with scientific
consensus[w] as scientifically
scientific theory that was proved in its mathematical
construct to be analytically true, could be unwarily misled by
a natural cognitive paradox of its empirical observation. As such, it
would have had been fallaciously established in the delusion of its subjective
and ignorantly refers to its delusionally perceived observation as the
Such a misperception for the actuality
of its empirical observation,
with its artificial
in its subliminally[d]
of mathematics with deductive
are effective tools in applied science, and the propositional
knowledge[w] of a theory established by deductive
analysis, although can be made unassailably
conclusive in its mathematical
model[w] with the analytical proof for its
it is not the proof for its postulated[d]
actuality. It must not be mistaken that the actuality of any natural phenomenon
that are deduced with its axiomatic[d]
mathematical construct, can be conclusively and absolutely proven with
its validated and precise quantitative predictions.
far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain,
and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.”
deep-rooted belief in the capability of mathematical principles for conducting
evaluation to validate a scientific claim solely through unassailable
analysis with quantitative
could lead to the illusion of knowledge under the subliminally
circumstances of its science delusion.
mathematically proven conclusion of its mathematical construct
physics[w] solely deduced with quantitative
rigors, although could have integrated its inference[w]
with its empirical observations, in its abstract[w]
with its a priori[g]
assumption, it was based on its philosophy
of science[w] with varying degrees of uncertainty
for its interpretation of the numbers obtained from the observations.
All such hypotheses asserted with the contemporary scientific method,
are merely the mathematical interpretations of the empirical observations
perceived in the worldviews[w]
of their postulated objective realities.
mathematical constructs of natural phenomena in theoretical physics, technically
are their hypotheses[w]
established with the propositions of their axioms[w].
And as much as almost all of the recognized experts in mainstream mathematical
physics[w] believe math is the language of the
the subjective reality of any axiom that was validated with the a
posteriori[d] conclusion in the mathematical
construct of any natural phenomenon, is not conclusively proven at all
when referred to reality.
mathematics can precisely describe empirically observed natural
phenomena with its validated hypothetical constructs, by itself
it is not the correct tool to accurately describe the actualities
of the natural phenomena.”
as defined in theoretical physics with the contemporary scientific method
to develop hypothetical constructs for emulating natural phenomena based
on its posits[g] for objective
reality[m], is merely the doctrine for its a
methodologies and techniques of quantitative analysis, which are for explicating
the empirically observed behaviors of physical objects in its postulated
an externally linked topic on "Allegory
of the Cave" that elaborates on obfuscated perceptions with an
illustration of a reality that is being perceived with shadows.
law[w] or axiom[w]
for the a priori
proposition[g] of an empirical observation that
was claimed to have been conclusively proven by the quantitative rigors
of its a
knowledge[m], would inevitably result in its
cognitive paradox fallacy[g]
when construed with its fallacious posits for the objective reality.
mathematics are great tools for applied science, they could be abused
can never solve a problem on the level on which it was created.”
person, in all honesty, develops any scientific theory with the contemporary
scientific method, construed with mathematical rigors in physics to establish
the a posteriori knowledge of any empirically observed
natural phenomenon, and thus asserts the axioms of its a priori
proposition with its unassailable deductions, at best is an intelligent
fool fooling himself in circular
reasoning[w]. And with its mathematically validated
proof for the a priori proposition concluded with its
a posteriori knowledge, the scientific theory justified[d]
in such positivism[w]
at its best can convincingly fool the mass majority of people with its
illusion of knowledge, which was construed for pragmatism[w]
with the artificial cognitive paradox attests in its subjective reality.
delusions of the a posteriori
propositions[g] that render their illusions
of knowledge, are paradoxically stemmed from their fallacious posits.
the UVS topic on "Logic
and belief systems" that illustrates and elaborates on the causalities
for some possible forms of science delusion.
intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent.”
is a myth[w]
that with the approach of deductive analyses based on scientific
models[w] for attaining highly precise and consistent
quantitative predictions to rigorously develop scientific theories with
proofs[w], and then test with repeatable physics
experiments[w], is generally the correct scientific
method for the investigation of natural phenomena to make scientific
progress[w]. Howsoever, the contemporary scientific
method muddles preciseness[d]
and thus is merely a practice pushing for higher resolution measurements[w]
that could be consistently measured in all possible forms of observational
don't believe in mathematics.”
an excerpt from "Cargo
Cult Science" by Richard Feynman relating to qualitative evaluation,
externally linked topics on "A
priori and a posteriori", "THE
FOUNDATIONAL CRISIS OF MATHEMATICS", and "LINEAR
MATHEMATICS IN INFINITE DIMENSIONS" that elaborates on induction
is supposed to precede deduction, for without the first, one cannot be
certain that one's statements are true; it emphasized that mathematics
has to be inductive discipline first and a deductive discipline second.
simple example to illustrate a cognitive paradox fallacy of an apparent
observation that was resolved, can be explicated with a fallacious perception
of the geocentrism. It was postulated that the Sun takes approximately
twenty-four hours to revolve around the Earth, and this could be empirically
observed and quantitatively verified. And since ancient times, the quantitative
prediction for this perception had been more precisely measured by using
all sorts of clock with ongoing improvements for higher precision. In
science[w], this few millennium-old mainstream
knowledge was officially falsified since two centuries ago. And in hindsight,
it is now completely dismissed without the slightest doubt that this was
stemmed from a false fact. However, in the geocentric era, this false
fact that was construed with its physical paradox, and deduced in its
delusion as a scientifically proven knowledge with precise quantitative
measurements, to a great extent was undoubtedly, independently, and officially
accepted for around two millenniums by the majority of people from all
over the world in all walks of life.
has the completely false reputation
of yielding infallible conclusions.”
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
ancient Greek astronomy, the mathematical constructs based on the geocentric
model[w] can work for quantitative predictions
of natural events, such as the earthly events of the
precession[w] cycle, equinox[w],
Nonetheless, these pragmatic quantitative analyses were fundamentally
established on the fallacious a priori proposition of
an Earth-centered universe.
systems of epitrochoid[w]
cycle based on the fallacious a priori proposition
is the center of the universe[m], nevertheless
could be successfully used with the deferent
and epicycles[w] of the Sun to make quite
precise quantitative predictions with geocentrism.
these workable quantitative analyses reckoned with validated deductive
proofs for substantiating the claim of fact that it takes a period
of approximately twenty-four hours for the Sun to revolve around
the Earth in a solar
day, is a known fallacy in modern science. A mathematical deduction
substantiated with successful quantitative predictions that were
fundamentally derived in the worldview of its artificial cognitive
paradox, can analytically conclude a false fact as being valid with
prophecy[w] by self-referencing[w].
cognitive paradox fallacies were as the results of the natural delusions
that are being rendered in the apparent geocentric motions. They
were caused by the relative motion illusions with a subliminally
manifested natural negation to result in their fallacious empirical
observations of the natural phenomena.
on right illustrates the basic elements of Ptolemaic
system for astronomy based on the geocentric model, showing
a planet (orange color object) on an epicycle (smaller dotted circle)
with a deferent (larger dotted circle) and an equant
(solid black dot •) directly opposite the Earth (purple and
white color object) from the center of the deferent (symbol x).
Watch a video clip on "Ptolemy's
geocentric universe" for further elaboration.
of a planet can be solved mathematically with the deferent and epicycle
of the planet based on geocentrism. And the mathematical construct
of the epicycle system, developed based on the apparent planetary
motion as observed in the celestial
can provide workable solutions with its quite precise quantitative
predictions for describing this peculiar phenomenon that recurs
empirically observed epicycles of planets were deemed as immutable
facts in the geocentric era.
motion of Mars. [s]
it is now a falsified fact that the planet in its apparent retrograde
motion, is physically moving in the opposite diurnal
as it could be empirically observed from the Earth. The delusion is caused
by the cognitive paradox of its relative motion illusion, rendered with
in the apparently observed
celestial coordinate system[w].
validated theoretical physics model could flop when refers to reality
if the posits for what it postulates are not qualitatively verified.
an externally linked topic on "Copernican
Revolution" that elaborates on the heliocentric paradigm shift.
that all planets rotate and revolve around the Sun, is a rational proposition
that can qualitatively explain the empirically observed apparent retrograde
motions of planets. However, as compared with the quantitative predictions
based on the geocentric model that had been well established for over
a millennium, Copernicus[w]
at then did not managed to make more precise quantitative predictions
for the empirically observed apparent retrograde motion of planets. His
qualitatively correct heliocentric
based proposition on planets was apparently observed to be in their retrograde
motions, was thus officially rejected with the geocentric peer-review[w]
new idea must not be judged by its immediate results.”
- Nikola Tesla
mathematical construct of a hypothetical model that can consistently work
with its very precise quantitative predictions for describing an empirical
observation, can fallaciously qualify the a
of its abstract by self-referencing[w]
the mathematical construct of a paradoxically construed theory can pragmatically
work with great precision.
“What one has undoubtedly believed as an actuality is one thing,
what is its actuality could be another thing.”
- UVS inspired
qualitative evaluation, a highly precise quantitative prediction for an
observed phenomenon, is merely the a posteriori knowledge
of measurement based on the subjective reality of its validated mathematical
theory, which was established in the abstract of its mathematically quantifiable
Although it can indisputably quantify how the observed phenomenon works
in its mathematical construct, and its know-how[w]
could be successfully used for pragmatic[w]
applications, such as for successful tracking of celestial objects with
its highly precise quantitative predictions as could be empirically observed,
it is not the proof[w]
for the actuality on the know-what[d]
of the observed phenomenon.
pragmatical know-how developed with the postulated concept[d]
of its scientific model, is not by de-facto the proof
for the actuality of its empirical observation.
how to quantitatively predict a phenomenon would work with its model is
how does the phenomenon
in reality could be another thing.”
The successful predictions for natural phenomena with quantitative rigors
in the exact
sciences[w] of geocentrism, are in fact not
proofs[w] for the first principles of the postulated
as a matter of fact, although the equatorial
sphere[w], and celestial
coordinate system[w] are geocentric based, in
modern astronomy, they are still very successful, much simpler, and more
cost-effective with its know-how than those modern pieces of equipment
that are heliocentric based.
validated quantitative prediction despite has true value for its pragmatism,
it does not prove its postulated first principle.
epistemology, any validated pragmatic
theory of truth[w] with what it postulates,
cannot be substantiated as its criteria
of truth[w]. As valid as these theories could
be, their postulations asserted with precise and absolute mathematical
proofs for their pragmatic theories of truth, are not absolutely conclusive
in objective reality. Thus, the propositional knowledge in math when referred
to reality for whatsoever that is being emulated, can never by itself
be reckoned as the knowledge[w]
for the actuality of any empirical observation.
how to make it work is one thing, how
it actually works is another issue,
and what you think on how it fundamentally works could be another story.”
is a cognitive paradox fallacy that Moon rises in the East and set
in the West as it could be apparently observed from Earth in its
frame[w]. Nonetheless, with inductive
reasoning based on the heliocentric model, by tracking the positions
of the Moon on a daily basis at a specific time of the day for its
celestial coordinates in the celestial sphere over a period of a
few days, it could be empirically observed that the Moon actually
revolves around the Earth from West to East; this qualitative analysis
in its transcendental perspective can resolve this cognitive paradox
of relative motion illusion that has paradoxically caused the cognitive
paradox fallacy in its delusion.
was also a known optical motion illusion of a natural cognitive paradox
that the Moon apparently appears to be simultaneously following every
observer spontaneously, to wherever all these individual observers on
Earth who are each moving independently to different directions. This
is a very amazing natural cognitive paradox, and its discernible optical
illusion can be easily resolved for elucidating its all applicable delusion
of passive transformation in all its localized points of view.
is what stands the test of experience.”-
with his hypothesis by inductive
reasoning[w] on the time of descent for free-falling
objects, is independent of their mass. This was with qualitative rigor
in the law
of noncontradiction[w] for the analysis of its
a priori assumption, and the insight of this Galileo's
hypothesis had thus addressed the cognitive paradox fallacy in Aristotle's
theory of gravity, which falsely states that heavier object falls faster.
It was believed that Galileo proved this predication later by dropping
two balls of different mass from the Leaning Tower of Pisa, and the experiment
demonstrated that the time of the descent of the balls is independent
of their mass. The experimental proof for the predicated a
qualitatively concludes as the a
knowledge[g] for free-falling objects on their
time taken for their descents, is independent of their mass.
externally linked topics on "Galileo's
Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment" that elaborates the Galileo's
hypothesis for free falling objects, "Two
New Sciences" by Galileo that elaborates on the law of falling
bodies, and "Logical
reasoning" that elaborates on inductive reasoning and abductive
Galileo believed mathematics is the language of the universe, he emphasized
it with the conviction of qualitative analyses.
an era where astronomy was based on the geocentric model of the
universe[m], all mainstream astronomers
in that era believed that Venus[w]
revolves around Earth like the Moon. At then the extreme crescent
phase of Venus had been observed with naked-eye observations, and
it was also known that Moon and Venus shine by reflecting the light
of the Sun.
Galileo through observations with his telescope had observed Venus
did simultaneously exhibited phases[w]
similar to that of the Moon when they were in close proximity, he
evaluated the actuality for the predicated orbiting path of Venus
with circumspection based on the Copernican
heliocentrism[w]. And after an extensive
period of telescopic observation, then by abductive
its transcendental perspective on
showed its phase and size variations with a peculiarity[w],
which can only happen if it was revolving around the Sun. Galileo
thus resolved the physical
paradox[w] by elucidating its geocentric
model delusion for the orbiting path of Venus, and therefore proved
Venus revolves around the Sun and not the Earth.
externally linked topics on "Phases
of Venus", and "An
animated simulation for phases of Venus" for further elaborations.
phase and size variations of Venus. [s]
foundation for the a
knowledge[m] on Venus revolves around the Sun,
was first established by inductive reasoning based on the Copernican heliocentrism
that intuitively invoked its transcendental perception. And then with
abductive reasoning in its transcendental perspective for evaluating its
observations, which was by synthetic judgment on the periodically observed
phase and size variations of Venus as seen from a farther away Earth,
it thus proved the heliocentric predication that asserts Venus revolves
around the Sun.
questions of science, the authority of a thousand
is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”
even a single formula was involved for this visual inductive resolution
accomplished by Galileo, and the method had conclusively proven the a
priori proposition on Venus revolves around the Sun and not the
Earth; its resolution was gradually drawn out for its visualizations that
eventually established its qualitative proof with its corresponding theory
of truth after the extensive period of observation.
to the discipline[w]
of mainstream theoretical
physics[w] that is currently being reckoned
by the vast majority of the experts, without any mathematical equation
for its quantitative analysis, the research done by Galileo that thus
had proven Venus revolves around the Sun, is not science[w]
in its nowadays practice.
this Galilean research is absolutely well-grounded[d]
with the proven assertion that has precedential significant, and it refers
to reality for how the observed phenomenon actually works; the proven
predication that asserts Venus revolves around the Sun is indubitably
an epistemic truth[w]
in objective reality for the actuality of its empirical observations.
From the first
principle[w] of this a priori
knowledge on Venus revolves around the Sun, it can then be grounded more
correctly for developing its a
knowledge[m] with quantitative
research[w]. This thus could enable its further
research to be accurate on making the quantitative predictions for the
location, phase, size, and brightness of Venus for its time-based observations
observed from the postulated rotating Earth.
would be better for the true physics if there were no mathematicians on
physics[w] has dominated the mainstream theoretical
physics with the a posteriori knowledge of measurements
for describing natural phenomena, which are based on their posits with
scientific consensus, all other concepts of foundationalism[w]
have had been discreetly prejudiced as scientism[w].
Consequently, under such dogmatic circumstances of the indoctrination[d],
those who disagree would be politically pontificated[d]
and then ostracized[d]
by all means with all sorts of stereotypings[w]
for their marginalizations[d].
While those who endorse with confirmation
bias[w], could thus monopolize all perceivable
privileges to autonomously serve the self-reinforcing cohort of its non-self-critical
establishment to dominantly sprawl with its spurious[d]
the transition to modern
physics[w], the essence of the original
scientific method[w] practiced by Galileo, which
was later advocated by Francis
Bacon[w], has had been compromised.
an externally linked topic on "Baconian
method" that elaborates on the application of inductive reasoning
for making generalizations from observations.
should remember that there was once a discipline called Natural
Philosophy. Unfortunately, this discipline seems
not to exist today. It has been renamed science, but the science
of today is in danger of losing much of the natural philosophy aspect.”
science[w] as defined in the nowadays mainstream
physics with the officially endorsed fundamental theories for establishing
theories of truth[w] in their subjective realities
that emulate the objective reality, is very much constrained only in the
development of the a posteriori knowledge of measurements
with mathematical formalizations. And generally, it merely requires rigorously
precise quantitative predictions in experimental
physics[w] for proving the testable propositions
of the empirically observed natural phenomena, construed in the postulated
reality of their models with the officially endorsed posits.
the posits for such typical fundamental theories with the applications
of the contemporary scientific method, were being proven by self-referencing
with the a posteriori knowledge that were established
in their fallaciously endorsed subjective realities.
there was no direct
proof[w] that the electron vibration frequency
of the caesium-133 atom used in the atomic
clock[w], would remain stable when it is subjected
to different inertial accelerations. But assumed to be
stable, and thus posited in the mathematical constructs of modern physics,
thereon by self-referencing with its quantitative proofs that were boasted
to have ten-digit precision of a second, tested in collaboration with
independent competing experiments, and validated with its precise quantitative
predictions that have been overwhelmingly successful for engineering[w]
and technological achievements, it was thus misleadingly used with such
convictions to conclude that transformation of time occurs; the postulation
for time is physically transformable as posited in modern physics was
fallaciously proven with circular
reasoning[w]. This is as fallacious as the claims
of proof for geocentrism with self-fulfilling
prophecy[w], which uses its successful quantitative
analyses to validate by self-reference with its belief, and thus has had
insidiously corrupted all its perceptions in the postulated reality of
its scientific constructs that were perceived in their observational delusions.
can persistently fool himself in a delusion that paradoxically and consistently
his fallacious belief, and therefore persistently believes in what is
UVS inspired -
the UVS topics on "Qualitative
evaluation on time dilation" that elaborates on a crucial foundational
crisis and its artificial cognitive paradoxes in modern physics, and "The
structure of atom" that coherently explicates on how atoms with
their specific resonant frequencies could be vortically manifested.
the quantitative proof of a scientific theory, is not the proof[w]
of the scientific theory.
is who, what, where, when, and why for how the contemporary scientific
method, has had taken the wrong path for establishing the current form
of modern physics with its fallacious posit for time, and thus has had
rendered its foundational crisis that had resulted in all the possible
constructs of its physical paradoxes.
“A tiny wrong assumption could lead to its huge misadventures.”
- UVS inspired
qualitative proof for the a priori assumption in its criteria
all its validated a posteriori deductive proofs
with precise and consistent quantitative predictions,
are not conclusive at all when referred to reality.
definition for what is a scientific
theory[w], and in self-justifications[w]
the mainstream physics[w]
with its intrinsically flawed scientific
method[w] on its criteria
renders all the possible physical
paradoxes[w] in its science delusions.
The empirical observations evaluated with the intrinsically flawed scientific
suffered all possible forms of natural cognitive paradox. With the fallaciously
assumed posits[g], these
thus suffered all possible kinds of foundational crisis. The conclusions
of their experiments established with all possible forms of artificial
cognitive paradox, could therefore be factitiously[d]
concluded in all possible ways of reification[d].
Construed with the fallaciously postulated hypothetical
constructs[w] that were conceived in all possible
factitious forms of subjective reality, they could be speciously validated
with all possible means of circular
definition[w]. Consequently, these undertakings
with the sophistries of their circular
reasonings[w], inevitably would entail all possible
constructs of physical paradox.
evaluate the actuality of any natural phenomenon with its scientific
hypothesis[m] that refers to reality, the epistemic[w]
process with qualitative rigor on correspondence
theory of truth[w] for the a priori
proposition of its empirical observation, is the foremost. Despite quantitative
research[w] with true
value[w] is an essential aspect for scientific
works, its qualitative analysis must precede quantitative analysis.
qualitative proof, it cannot be certain on the quantitative prediction
of any scientific theory is true.
the UVS topic on "The
criteria of truth of the UVS research" that elaborates on checking
the wholeness and integrity of knowledge.
'paradox' is only a conflict between reality
and your feeling of what reality 'ought to be.'”
is the belief in the ignorance of experts.” -
have often made the hypothesis that ultimately physics will not require
a mathematical statement,
that in the end the machinery will be revealed and the laws will turn
out to be simple.” -
back at the worst times, it always seems that they were times
in which there were people who believed with absolute faith and
absolute dogmatism in something. And they were so serious in this
matter that they insisted that the rest of the world agree with
them. And then they would do things that were directly inconsistent
with their own beliefs in order to maintain that what they said
- Richard Feynman
cognitive paradox fallacy in Copernican heliocentrism
a planetary system; planets, dwarf planets, asteroids (a.k.a.
minor planets), comets, and space debris orbit the central
star in elliptical orbits."
- Excerpt from
Wikipedia in "Planetary
externally linked topics on "Solar
System model", and "Orrery"
that illustrates the relative positions for the motions of
planets and Moon with Sun as the center of the Solar System.
is an immutable fact that all Solar
System[w] objects including the Sun are
moving in helical paths through space while revolving around the
Center[w], and this could be visualized
from an external reference
frame[w] in their transcendental perspectives.
the revelation on this fact, one have to let go the Copernican
heliocentrism[w] and its improved mathematical
constructs for the Solar System model with elliptical orbits, which
are still being disseminated in astronomy; this is merely a localized
perception with incomplete view. And in its negation, it would not
reflect the actual celestial
mechanics[w] of planetary motion.
Sun is not the center of the Solar System.”
the UVS topics on "The
structure of galaxy", "Heliosphere"
that elaborates on how are planetary orbits manifested in
their ring torus orbitals, "The
vortically manifested planetary orbitals", "The
axial precession of the Earth" that elaborates on
an orbital forcing of the Earth, and "A
comparative analysis of the Solar System with the UVS atomic
model" that illustrates on the vortical orbitals
of the Solar System and the UVS atomic model.
See also an externally linked topic on "The
Universal Helicola" that presents an impeccable illustration
for the helical motion of Earth's path in space on page 269
in figure 13.1, it was elaborated qualitatively, analytically
and quantitatively. Watch video clips on "Earth
Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun" that
illustrates with an external perception for the helical motion
of Earth along a moving Sun, and "The
solar system's motion thru space" for a conceptual
illustration on the helical motions of planets. Note: Qualitatively,
these animated illustrations would be more accurate if the
barycenter motion of a moving Sun that propagates in a composite
helical path around the Galactic Center were shown, nonetheless,
despite their flaws and technical errors, these were still
excellent animated illustrations for the helical motions of
celestial objects are externally impelled to rotate and revolve
in vortical motion with resonated precession effects.”
- UVS inspired
Sun exchanges angular momentum primarily with Jupiter, and
also with all other Sun's satellites and stuff in the heliosphere[w]
while the Sun moves. It is a scientific-fact[d]
that the Sun spirals to revolve around the barycenter of the
Solar System with its invariable
plane[w] tilted at around 60°
in its path. And it is believed that the Sun revolves by spiraling
around the dual-core Galactic Center of the Milky
Way[w] galaxy at the velocity of
approximately 232 km/s, and it takes around 230 million years
to make one revolving cycle.
two celestial objects revolving around each other with their
barycenter vortically moving through space, will spiral in
helical motions with precession effects. In the external reference
frame of the Milky Way galaxy, the Sun as a matter of fact
is spiralling to move in a composite helical path to revolve
around the Galactic Center.
in the Solar System, and that includes the Sun, in actual
fact is vortically revolving around the gravitational
singularity[uvs] of the Milky
Way in a nested helical motion.
could thus be perceived that the motion of the Solar
System, is a vortical motion transferred from the vortical
motion of the Milky Way galaxy, and the Solar System
is being coalesced in a resonated vortical motion with
its vortically captured nebulous material. This infers
the motion of the Sun, is primarily impelled by the
vortical motion of its galaxy. And this thus elucidates
that the helical motions of Solar System objects, are
manifested by the vortical motion of the Solar System.
physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure
of the universe.”
kinetic energy[w] of Earth according
to Kepler's law of planetary motion, is ~2.687E33 kg.m²/s²
(or joules); ½mv²,
where m is ~5.972E24 kg for the mass of Earth, v is ~30 km/s
for the Earth's orbiting velocity. Nonetheless, Earth moving
through space is impelled by the Milky Way galaxy that moves
at the velocity of ~369
km/s against the CMB
therefore a primary kinetic energy of Earth in this rest frame
should be ~4.07E35
average kinetic energy of the Earth from this transcendental
perspective in the CMB rest frame, is a staggering 151 times
of the quantitatively predicted kinetic energy of the Earth
that was based on a static Sun, which is way far out of reality,
and this has significant induced precession effects on a vortically
resolved cognitive paradoxes thus render the revelation
on celestial objects are apparently rotating and revolving
in their spiral motions. These visual inductive resolutions
have significant implications for advancing the knowledge
of an underlying celestial mechanism that hitherto has
been oversighted with conventional
image to the right is an observation of a newly formed
HL Tau with its protoplanet that was coalescing
in a womb of gas.
In the UVS
worldview, the star HL Tau still at infancy stage
of a star birth, is coalescing in vortical motion with
its protoplanet HL Tau b (small circular bright image
at slightly after one o'clock position) also in the
process of forming as a gaseous planet in its resonance
of vortical motion.
the UVS topics on "The
interactions of the hyperspherical pushed-in gravity
in superior and inferior conjunction", and
that elaborates on how some significant discoveries
could be asserted with this UVS perspective.
HL Tau and its protoplanet HL Tau b. [s]
the proposition of heliocentrism[w]
is valid on the Earth is not the center of the universe, its
of a static Sun is the center of the universe with motionless
stars was falsified in the twentieth century astronomy. Notwithstandingly,
laws of planetary motion[w] and
law of universal gravitation[w],
were based on this incorrect a priori assumption
that causes the cognitive paradox fallacy in their mathematical
paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with
its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.”
UVS inspired -
asserting that Kepler's laws of planetary motion were based
on scientifically proven facts, and these laws have had achieved
consensus[w] with further
support from Newton's laws[m], in
its artificial cognitive paradox of a static Sun with its
putative laws of physics, one could maintain its propositions
are proven; this is a negated perception of the natural phenomenon
that was perceived in the subjective
of its model with a static Sun.
is how the putative laws of physics could lie with the deductive
inference in the mathematical construct for its empirical
observation when it gets to reality; in its concept from its
localized perception it negates the reality. And in its delusion,
it results in its illusion of knowledge with its a
posteriori deductive proof.
“The illusion of knowing is unresolvable in the delusion of its cognitive paradox.”
- UVS inspired
the UVS perspective, the barycenter
of the Solar System[uvs] is the
centre of the Solar System. The Sun and its planets with their
resonated precession cycles are perpetually spiralling toward
the barycenter of the Solar System, which is perpetually moving
away with the vortical motion in its helical path in the galactic
reference frame; this renders the phenomenon of planetary
orbits with elliptical and apsidal motions that are precessing
in the localized reference frame of a static Sun.
Solar System objects with the orbital
inclinations[w] of their apsidal
precessions[w] at tilted angles
on the invariable
plane[w], in fact are abscribing
a nested ring
with their planetary oribitals.
The vortical motions in the helical paths of spiralling planets
were independently visualized with the UVS model in the UVS
topic on "The
structure of galaxy" without any prior reference.
Other similar concepts were later found through the Internet
on further inquiry, such as "Spiral
Forms in Space" as illustrated by Dr. Wilhelm Reich
(MD) in the web site of Dr. James DeMeo, Ph.D., "Universal
Helicola" as illustrated by Dr. Vladimir Ginzburg,
solar system's motion thru space" as illustrated
by Nassim Haramein. Nonetheless, among these similar illustrations,
UVS uniquely illustrated with empirical evidence for how the
Sun and its planets were vortically formed, why they
propagate in spiral motions through space, and how they are
vortically impelled to move in nested spiral motions around
orbits are manifested with the vortical motion resonants
in the torus force fields of their nested vortical hyperspheres.” -
UVS research predicates the orbit of a planet is manifested
by the vortical motion that has intrinsically transferred
from the nested hypersphere of the Solar System.
~ With special thanks to Dr. Kevin Dann for his email (dated: 06/06/2021)
sharing an e-book on "INTRODUCTORY
ESSAYS ON RUDOLF STEINER'S STAR-KNOWLEDGE", wherein Steiner mentioned:
"Copernicus said that the sun also moves.". This is a crucial
postulation that was oversignted in the Copernican Revolution for describing
The cognitive paradox fallacy in Big Bang model on the metric expansion of space
to the Big Bang model, the universe[w]
has expanded from an extremely dense and hot state, and continues
to expand today in its metric
expansion of space[w].
that in the expansion of space, every celestial object in
approximately 13.8 billion years, has reached its current
time-dilated spatial location in a timeline[w]
according to the trajectory of the celestial object in its
definitively determined the age of the universe to be 13.77
billion years old to within 1% (0.12 billion years) -as recognized
in the Guinness Book of World Records!" - excerpt from
Microwave Anisotropy Probe".
an externally linked topic on "The
Distance Scale of the Universe" that elaborates on
all types of distance
measures, see also a
software tool for calculating distance measures. Note:
All figures herein are in approximation to three significant
Big Bang model propositioned that the boundary of the observable
universe in every direction, is a view at ~13.8 billion years
ago when the universe was in its primordial stage. Paradoxically,
this is absolutely contradicting in its three
main fundamental aspects to all extents.
paradoxically postulates that at the initial stage of the
Big Bang within its first second, the extremely small, dense
and hot state of the nascent universe, is currently being
empirically observed in its time dilation image at ~13.8 billion
years ago to be a spheroidal structure with an extremely large
radius of ~13.8 Gly in an extremely sparse and cooled state.
the Big Bang model is incontrovertibly a physical
paradox[w], and it absolutely has
flopped under the law
Big Bang model is a self-referenced mathematical construct
that creates an artificial cognitive paradox of the most extreme
physical extents that are fallacious in its contradicting
this artificial cognitive paradox critically resolved, the
Big Bang model is so busted; the Big Bang is a myth.
from inflation to the WMAP. [s]
to the Big Bang model, the universe expanded from an
extremely dense and hot state and continues to expand
today. A common analogy explains that space itself is
expanding, carrying galaxies with it, like raisins in
a rising loaf of bread. The graphic scheme above is
an artist concept illustrating the expansion of a portion
of a flat universe."
- Excerpt from Wikipedia on
The proposition of expanding space in the Big Bang model is
inconsistence in its own conceptual
framework[w], although in its hypothetical
construct it would be mathematically valid, and could be analytically
understood, in its correspondence
theory of truth[w], it was erroneous
for its theory
of justification[w]; the Big Bang
model is a paradoxical construct.
Bang Theory Busted By 33 Top Scientists" for An Open
Letter to the Scientific Community, see also the video clips
on "Cosmology Quest - Debunking Quackademic Cosmology"
1 of 4, Part
2 of 4, Part
3 of 4, and Part
4 of 4 that illustrate with numerous empirical observations
on the fallacy of the cosmological redshift, and a thesis
Redshift Data and the Myth of Cosmological Distance".
and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in
which we live.”
the UVS worldview,
universe[w] forms its
physical structures[uvs] in the
paradigm of a vortical hypersphere[uvs].
the UVS topics on "The
apparently observed expanding universe", "Qualitative
evaluation on time dilation",
experiment reviewed with UVS",
UVS reviews on the General Relativity concepts of gravity",
causality of gravity", "The
cosmological model of UVS", and "The
formation of stars and galaxies" for further elaboration.
The UVS research predicates the observable
universe is vortically formed in the torus transformed nested
hypersphere that has had manifested the cosmos with its intrinsic
cognitive paradox fallacy in cosmic inflation on accelerated expansion
distant galaxies in all directions were empirically observed
to be receding in acceleration at rates proportional to their
distance, the Big Bang model that describes the expansion
of space with the deceleration had then fallen apart.
inflation[w] with a runaway expansion
of space answers the classic conundrum of the big Bang cosmology[w],
it is thus now considered as part of the standard hot Big
place of an expanding balloon, the explanation with the Big
Bang model, now adopts the analogy of a raisin
pudding model[m] to explain the
empirically observed phenomenon for the accelerated expansion
of space with cosmic inflation.
is now postulated[d]
in the Big Bang model that space is expanding exponentially.
raisin pudding model as the analogy of the Big Bang
limited by the speed
of light[w], the empirical observation
of the observable universe on receding galaxies in their frame
of reference[w], would be apparently
affected by timeline and time dilation effect; this is the composition
of a relativistic time frame negation effect.
in circumstances of the decelerated recession of the galaxies
in the observable universe, those distant galaxies that are apparently
observed in their further timelines of more distant past from
Earth, would paradoxically appear to be receding at increasing
velocities than a distant galaxy at a nearer timeline of lesser
would naturally render an optical illusion as a result of the
relativistic time frame negation effect, and thus renders the
apparent observation on distant galaxies are receding in acceleration
at rates proportional to their distance.
cognitive paradox fallacy is as a result of its empirical observation
that was perceived in its composite optical illusion, which is
rendered by the composite effect of timeline and time dilation.
an externally linked topic on "Accelerating
expansion of the universe" that elaborates on how the
accelerated expansion of space were measured by two independent
proposition on the universe is expanding at an increasing rate
with proper distance at proper
time[w] as observed, concluded with
scale factor[w] a(t) has a positive
derivative[w], did not address or account
for the relativistic time frame negation effect; it merely creates
a fallacious artificial cognitive paradox with its mathematical
treatment that misleads people with a misconception to
believe its relativistic effects had been accounted.
a receding distant galaxy that was later observed to have a higher
velocity in different time frame, was actually its time dilated
image observed at a further timeline of its more distant past.
For instant, a receding distant galaxy observed in its time dilation
image one year later, is paradoxically its image of another one
more year older, which at then the image reaches the Earth from
a farther timeline.
mathematical treatment applied to illustrate that space accelerates
exponentially, asserted with the proposition of proper distance
for the calculation of the optically observed deep space objects
that were moving in a frame of reference on different timelines,
will not correct it from its natural cognitive paradox rendered
by the relativistic time frame negation effect; the derivation of
velocities among the distant galaxies was apparently observed on
peer-reviewed conclusion of the revised Big Bang model with cosmic
inflation on exponentially expanding space, is a fallacy.
is simply because its mathematical construct with its postulated
metric expansion of space, was stemmed from the natural cognitive
paradox in a composite optical illusion, which is caused by optical
negation rendered by the limited speed of light from distant galaxies
receding on different timelines.
proposition for accelerated expansion of space, is a physical paradox
that was fallaciously asserted in its delusional observations, which
had thus entailed its science delusion in the fallacious subjective
of its hypothetical construct.
realizing the cognitive paradoxes that negate to cause delusions
in the observable universe,
the paradoxical effect of the cosmos has had fooled even the very
intelligent people.” -
In the UVS worldview
with the natural cognitive paradox resolved and its posit for absolute
space, it predicates[d]
that the distances between distant galaxies in the observable universe,
were extending in absolute space with the vortical chain
reaction of a
nested hypersphere system[uvs].
accelerated receding of distant galaxies is an optically negated
delusional observation, which is rendered by the
paradoxical effect of the cosmos[uvs]
in an obfuscated topsy-turvy[d]
The UVS research predicates the distances between distant galaxies
in the observable universe were extending with a vortical
chain reaction in absolute space.
cognitive paradox fallacy in Michelson-Morley experiment
astronomers believe the Milky Way is moving at approximately 600
km/s relative to the observed locations of other nearby galaxies.
Another reference frame is provided by the Cosmic microwave background.
This frame of reference indicates that The Milky Way is moving at
around 552 km/s." -
Excerpt from Wikipedia on motion
a nutshell, with the deduction that a celestial object moving
in a static medium of luminiferous aether would experience
a drag, an aether wind should be detectable. This is because
Earth revolves at approximately 30 km/s around Sun, the Sun
revolves at approximately 232 km/s around the Galactic Center
of Milky Way, therefore Earth moving in this static medium
should show a significant aether wind, and more significantly
if the movement of Milky Way in space relative to Cosmic microwave
background at approximately 552 km/s is considered.
there is such an aether wind at all, it should be easily detected
with the interferometer.
video simulation. [s]
in all Michelson-Morley experiments, measurements of such
expectations were not detected at all, it was thus concluded
that the postulated[d]
static luminiferous aether does not exist; the postulated
static luminiferous aether would have had been detected by
the Michelson-Morley experiments if it exists at all.
video clip on simulating Michelson-Morley experiment in aether
wind, and also see an
animated simulation of Michelson-Morley experiment that
its aether wind speed can be varied.
of evidence is not evidence of absence.”
scientific consensus on luminiferous
aether[w] does not exist, was based
on a null
hypothesis[w] with the null
result[w] obtained by the Michelson-Morley
this conclusion is logically fallacious. It had only concluded
that the postulated aether wind was not found with the a
priori assumption that luminiferous aether is a static
medium. Neither Albert Michelson nor Edward Morley had ever
considered that their experiment had disproved the aether
hypothesis; it merely had proven that the postulated static
aether does not exist.
the null hypothesis can never assert positively with its hypothetical
The experimental conclusion for the a priori
proposition that postulates a static medium of luminiferous
aether is proven to be inexistent, is not the proof for the
postulation that luminiferous aether is a static medium. The
scientific consensus with the null hypothesis, thus is simply
fallacy[w] of affirmative
conclusion from a negative premise[w]
in a hasty
generalization[w] with its argument
scientific fact must leave no room for any rational doubt.”
- UVS inspired
an analogy for the null hypothesis with null result, it would
be similar to setting up an experiment to measure electrical
power with the assumption that the electrical energy of a
running system is operated by direct
current[w]. And after the direct
current meter measured nothing, with the null result it concludes
that there is no electrical current in the running system.
This logical fallacy can also be rhetorically addressed as
of absence[w], was concluded with
herring[w] fallacy in its ignoratio
the assumption that luminiferous aether is a static medium,
one could regressively maintain a fallacious self-referential
cognitive paradox with strawman
argument[w] to assert that aether
was scientifically proven to be nonexistence
with its bigotry argument
from authority[w]. This is
merely a formal fallacy of affirming
in the subjective
of its hypothetical construct.
result of the hypothesis of a stationary ether is shown to
and the necessary conclusion follows that the hypothesis is
All the conclusions for aether does not exist in the abstract
mathematical constructs based on the absurd assumptions of
transformable space or reified time, were deduced with self-fulfilling
prophecies[w] by self-reference[w];
such artificial cognitive paradox fallacies were rendered
by their philosophies of science that do not require aether
to exist in their mathematical constructs. It is merely the
dogma of mathematical
physics[w] that asserts aether does
not exist with its argument from authority.
denying scientific principles, one may maintain any paradox.”
See the UVS topics on "Four-dimensional
spacetime continuum in a hypothetical construct for sound
wave in a vector space void of medium" that illustrates
a hatch job that could do away with the existence of air for
sound wave to propagate
in a hypothetical realm,
experiment reviewed with UVS"
for further elaboration.
UVS research predicates an inviscid aetheric medium is all-pervasive
throughout the entire observable universe.
make our world significant by the courage of our questions
and by the depth of our answers.”
- Carl Sagan
critical propositions of the UVS research
you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it
contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must
the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings.”
Leonardo da Vinci
questions of science, the authority of a thousand
is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.”
behavior is a trait of intelligence in a world full of conformists.”
- Nikola Tesla
is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities
you are out to describe the truth, leave elegance to the tailor.”
man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.”
is the theory that decides what can be observed.”
history of our study of our solar system shows us clearly that accepted
conventional ideas are often wrong, and that fundamental insights
can arise from the most unexpected sources.”
- Carl Sagan
is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to
persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.”
- Carl Sagan
facts are highly injurious to the progress of science, for they
often endure long;”
truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent.”
- William Blake
never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change
build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
- R. Buckminster Fuller
greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.” -
Daniel Joseph Boorstin
entire observable universe is subliminally paradoxical.”
- UVS inspired
paradoxical effect can consistently fool us with
its cognitive paradox in its state of delusion.”
UVS inspired -
we must not be afraid of being fooled; we are fools fooling ourselves
by afraid of being fooled after we are being subliminally fooled.”
paradoxical effect of the cosmos causes cognitive paradoxes by
negating the observations of natural phenomena, and mysteriously
them in all possible manners of subliminally negated circumstances.”
- UVS inspired
the paradoxes of universal delusions, stating the subliminally negated
actualities of natural phenomena is inevitably a revolutionary act.”
A scientific revolution
By Vincent Wee-Foo
predications of the UVS research
a nutshell, with the visual grounded
theory[w] research of the UVS treatise, the
list herein are the predications[d]
for the actualities[d]
of the empirically observed natural
on the hypothetical constructs of their empirical observations
that are based on the UVS
and were then analyzed
with their UVS
visual inductive resolutions[uvs]
for resolving their cognitive paradoxes[uvs]
in the conceptual
framework of UVS.
of the UVS research are always subjected to refinements in its
nested positive feedback loop[uvs],
which strive on their accuracy
with their unfolding empirical
evidence[w] for the postulated[d]
actualities of their empirical observations. Their
propositions with rigorous verifications could thus be falsified or conclusively
proven in their correspondence
theory of truth[w]. The verified predications
were then augmented[d]
into the UVS worldview,
while the falsified predications were then revamped, or rejected.
Galileo Galilei based his hypothesis on heliocentrism had qualitatively
predicted that ocean tides are caused by the Earth’s rotation and
its orbit around the Sun. He reasoned that as the Earth moves, the oceans
sloshed around thus resulting in tides. This predication was falsified
in modern astronomy with the empirical observations of the daily two tides
on Earth are primarily caused by the gravitational force of the Moon,
which thus proved the predication made by Johannes Kepler on ocean
tide. Nevertheless, Galileo's predication on Venus revolves around
the Sun and not the Earth, was indubitably justified with qualitative
proof for its actuality.
the case studies with their visual inductive resolutions of natural phenomena
in the UVS research are mostly in their qualitative forms, many of these
evidently verified a priori
propositions[g] by themselves as they are with
their elucidated delusions and resolved cognitive paradoxes, have had
eradicated the fallaciously justified
of their conventional
methodically proven a priori propositions of the UVS visual
inductive resolutions with their elucidated delusions, are therefore unequivocally
the well-justified true beliefs that are free of cognitive paradox[g],
and thus are the a
knowledge[m] for the actualities of the qualitatively
evaluated natural phenomena.
proven predications could then be accurately developed further, which
is by extending on their a priori knowledge for developing
research[w] to accurately establish their a
knowledge[m] with quantitative precision.
a UVS paper on "The
UVS case study on the barycentric drivers of the solar cycle"
that elaborates on one of the ground breaking a posteriori
analyses of the UVS visual grounded theory research.
Click on any of the symbolic buttons below next to its predication for
accessing the relevant UVS research on that particular natural phenomenon.
List of the
An inviscid aetheric medium is all-pervasive throughout the entire observable
The observable universe is vortically formed in the torus transformed
nested hypersphere that has had manifested the cosmos with its intrinsic
distances between distant galaxies in the observable
universe were extending with a vortical chain reaction in absolute
A supervoid is a vortically resonated toroidal vortex manifested in
the nested hypersphere of the cosmos.
The superclusters are held at the outer edges by the adjoining surfaces
of the supervoids.
galaxy cluster with hundreds of galaxy clusters is vortically held by
a nested toroidal vortex to vortically revolve around its center of
A galaxy cluster with thousands of galaxies are vortically held by a
nested toroidal vortex to vortically revolve around its center of mass.
The formation of stars in a cluster of galaxies is systematically caused
by the vortical motion of its nested intergalactic toroidal vortex.
With credit to Professor Christopher W. Hodshire from Western Michigan
A galaxy cluster is
vortically manifested and impelled in its nested intergalactic toroidal
vortex in the nested hypersphere of the cosmos.
A local galaxy group with tens of galaxies are vortically held by a
nested toroidal vortex to
vortically revolve around its center
A galaxy group is vortically formed, impelled, and encapsulated by an
optically invisible intergalactic
is vortically formed and impelled by the galactic vortex pair manifested
in its nested vortical hypersphere.
The gravitational singularity of a supermassive black hole is collectively
manifested with the vortical gravitational singularities of all other
star systems in the same galaxy.
A supermassive black hole is a vortical void of luminiferous aether
displaced by the vortical gravitational singularity of its galaxy.
A satellite galaxy is induced by the satellite galactic vortex of a
main galactic vortex.
globular cluster is formed in the wake of a dissipated satellite galactic
polar vortex pair that had intrinsically flattened the inner nested
elliptical galaxy is formed in the wake of a dissipated galactic vortex
pair that was flattening its inner nested galactic spheroidal vortex.
A quasar is a resonated satellite galaxy impelled by a significant harmonic
of its encapsulating nested galactic spheroid.Inspired
forum discussion with Allen Barrow.
The binary stars are revolving around each other in a common plasmatic
shell that has merged from the plasmatic shells of the two stars.
A star cluster is held together by the strong interactions from the
electromagnetic vortices of the stars in the weak vortical interactions
of their common galactic vortex.
A stellar black hole is a vortical void of luminiferous aether transformed
by a manifested vortical gravitational singularity of its star cluster
heliosphere is intrinsically formed by its nested vortical
hypersphere of the Solar System.
An accretion disk is formed by the vortically flattened polar vortex
pair in the inner sections of a nested toroidal vortex.
The glow of a a star is vortically ignited by the dynamo effect of magnetohydrodynamics
manifested in a resonated harmonic of its vortical gravitational singularity.
A new star is evolved by vortically coalesced stellar cloud formed in
a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair.
With credits to Allen
is formed with interstellar clouds by
a resonated nested satellite vortex pair manifested in its planetary
The Sun is impelled by its galactic vortex to rotate and revolve around
the Galactic Center in a perpetual vortical motion.
Star is impelled by its galactic vortex to vortically form with coalesced
nebulous material in a nested bipolar stellar vortex pair manifested
in its nested toroidal vortex.
black hole is a dual-core vortical void of luminiferous aether displaced
by a harmonic resonant of aether vortical motion.
A protoplanetary disk is a vortrex with glowing plasma and it is impelled
by the vortical column of its protostar.
A protostar is vortically spawned with the consolidated stellar clouds
resonated in its nested toroidal vortex.
Stellar nucleosynthesis is caused by hyperspherical vortex spin fusion
to assemble chemical elements with nuclear reactions occurring in the
cores of stars.
A star's nova outburst of x-ray and gamma ray is caused by a highly
energetic spinor field that underlies the star.
The brightness of star depends on electric current generated by dynamo
effect in magnetohydrodynamics of vortically consolidated plasma.
The immense heat in corona of the Sun is produced by vortical motion
of plasma jet streams with high speed spin by converting kinetic energy
A brown dwarf is a failed star that
has not acquired enough vortical momentum to excite its hydrogen atoms
to glow like a typical star.
The thermal radiation from the interior of a planetary object is generated
by the vortical motion manifested in its nested layers of viscous matter
with its induced precession effect.
The stars are held apart in their clusters by the electrostatic
repulsion forces that have manifested vortically on their nested vortical
A stellar jet is vortically formed in a polar vortex column with an
ionized jet of gas stream that has vortically culminated in its nested
toroidal vortex. With
credit to Anna
The debris disk of star is consolidated by a flattened nested stellar
polar vortex pair.
The spoke lines on the dust disk of a star are vortical
The Ring Center of a star is a polar vortex center of its planetary
supernova is caused in an unwinding process of its aetheric vortex that
impels the star to violently spin in the opposed directions.
The red giant star is vortically unwound with its vortical runaway effect
to expand and expel its materials. With
credit to anonymous from Singapore.
nebula is a vortically diffused planetary system wobbling in precession
with its nested and glowing plasma polar vortrex pair.
A sunspot is a plasmatic unisonal vortex that has spawned in the photosphere
of the Sun.
The Sun and its planets were vortically coalesced from the molecular
clouds of in a spiral arm of the Milky Way galaxy.
The inert dark center of a sunspot is caused by the void
of vortex eye that limits convection.
The long-lived corona holes of the Sun are vortical voids formed by
the polar vortex pair of the photosphere.
The solar jet stream pair is vortex substructures impelled by the polar
vortex pair of the photosphere.
The solar jet stream pair is manifested by the intense vortical interactions
of the BOTSS and the Sun by aligning with other major planetary barycenters.
A sunspot cluster is impelled by its solar jet stream and
this is impelled by its polar vortex in a unisonal vortical motion.
solar cycle is modulated by the barycenters of the major planets that
periodically align with the BOTSS and the Sun.
The eco-systems on Earth are extended far out into the Solar System
are significantly influenced by the oscillating BOTSS.
The grand solar minima are largely caused by the planetary barycentric
superior conjunctions when the Sun approaches nearest to the BOTSS during
the trough periods of the solar cycle.
The grand solar maxima are largely caused by the planetary
barycentric inferior conjunction when the Sun moves farthest away from
the BOTSS during the peak periods of the solar cycle.
The superior conjunction of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn would push Saturn to
a nearest point from the Sun with the effects of the hyperspherical
The inferior conjunction of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn would push Saturn to
a farthermost point from the Sun with the effects of the hyperspherical
The Sun is not the center of the Solar System.
The penumbra of a sunspot is a chain of satellite vortices manifested
in a ring torus structure and it forms around the vortically manifested
A sunspot pair is a dual-core unisonal vortex of the Sun's photosphere
and its dual-core is separated on its surface.
A corona mass ejection is caused by the conserved angular
momentum in the vortex column of a ruptured solar prominence.
The comets in the Oort cloud revolve around the barycenter of the Solar
System in an uniformly spread out manner are vortically consolidated
in the two-axis spin of its nested vortical hypersphere.
The comet's huge nested atmosphere is vortically held by its underlying
spheroidal torus vortex.
The comet outburst events in the outer Solar System are triggered by
significant barycenter effects of celestial objects.
The cometary electric glow discharge of gas coma in the outer Solar
System is rendered by the manifested charge field of significant barycenter
The Lagrangian points in the macrocosms are harmonics of vortically
manifested accreting spinor fields rendered by vortical motion of interacting
x-ray is caused by a highly energetic spinor field that underlies and
resonates with the coma intensively to vortically impel its electrostatically
The Lagrangian points could also be manifested from the spinor field
of a planetary barycenter that interacts with another Solar System objects.
The gas tail of comet is a glowing section of unisonal vortex manifested
in the coma.
The dust tail of the comet is formed by the vortrex of its gas tail
The vacuum in the gas tail of comet is the void in the vortex column
of its coma.
The craters on a comet can be drilled and carved by the vortical culmination
of manifested unisonal vortices in the coma.
The splitting of comet can be caused by the cyclonic gravity field effect
from larger suspended spheroid on near encounter.
The gas tail of the comet points directly to the dual-core magnetic
Rring Center of the solar system. *falsified
tail of the comet aligns with the spoke lines of a dual-core ring center.
planetary rings are the flattened nested polar vortex pair on the outer
atmospheric layers of a planet.
Great White Spot on Saturn is a vortex cluster rendered by the revolving
precession effect of Saturn with its axial tilt on a periodically intensified
The ring system of
a celestial object are vortically formed by resonated motion of the
nested celestial object with its flattened nested polar vortex pair.
The hexagonal structure on the polar vortex of Saturn is rendered by
the ~59.3 year synodic cycle of Jupiter and Saturn. With
credits to Graham
The cloud bands on Jupiter are formed by its nested polar vortex pair
with their cascaded vortex columns opened to differentiated extents
on its nested atmosphere.
The jet streams on Jupiter are manifested by the vortrices of the nested
polar vortex pair of Jupiter.
ovals and storms on Jupiter are coalesced by satellite vortices manifested
and impelled by the nested polar vortex pair of Jupiter.
The Jupiter's retrograde cloud bands are formed by the differential
motions in the chains of merged cyclonic satellite vortex clusters.
The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is primarily impelled by the three
Galilean moons in Laplace resonance. *falsified
The Great Red Spot is a persistent atmospheric eddy of its anti-cyclonic
satellite vortex formed at a fixed spot.
The solar System objects were manifested by hyperspherical vortex spin
fusion of interstellar clouds in resonant frequencies of standing wave
and they are vortically traversing in longitudinal waves.
The Solar System is formed in a planetary vortical system that has manifested
in the galactic vortical system of the Milky Way.
orbitals of natural satellites were developed as a result of conserved
angular momentum are being transferred from their underlying nested
The elliptical orbit of a planet with apsidal precession
is rendered by its vortical interactions of its star and the barycenter
of its planetary system.
rotation of Venus is cyclonically spinning in counter-clockwise direction
in its counter-clockwise revolving path. Inspired
forum discussion with Graham Burnett.
The primeval Earth with its Moon is vortically coalesced
with nebulous matarial captured in their ring torus force fields.
The Moon will be at a farthermost away point from the Earth in the lunar
opposition during the perihelion of the Earth.
The Moon will be at a nearest point to the Earth in the lunar opposition
during the aphelion of the Earth.
The tidal force is
vortically caused by a universal hyperspherical pushed-in gravity with
the reactive push momentum in its barycenter motion.
focused torque-induced precession from the Solar System alignment effect
can manifest all sorts of significant natural events on Earth.
A polar aurora is induced to manifest by its intensified nested atmospheric
The electromagnetic storm in the presence of an aurora is caused by
the intensified vortical effect of its underlying atmospheric vortex.
aurora glow is caused by the electric current generated by the dynamo
effect of the vortically consolidated plasma manifested in the ionosphere.
A clear air vortex is formed in an invisible atmospheric layer with
its resonated torque-free precession.
Antarctica Ozone Hole within the polar vortex wobbles and rotates in
synchronization with the Earth-Moon precession cycle.
Antarctica Ozone Hole is mechanically caused by the polar vortex that
displaces the ozone layer inside its vortex column.
The Antarctica Ozone Hole with significant difference in
temperature at adjacent air masses is caused by the vortically sank
nested atmosphere in the polar vortex column.
The Antarctica Ozone Hole can be significantly affected
by a focused torque-induced precession of the Solar System alignment
The ozone hole at North Pole could not form is as a result of the dragging
effects of landmass has weakened the intensity of the Arctic Polar Vortex.
A polar vortex is a nested atmospheric free vortex manifested on the
polar axis with the precession effects of the Earth.
A polar vortex is significantly affected by the focused tidal force
from an alignment of the major Solar System objects.
seasonal variation on Earth is rendered by the extent of how much the
nested polar vortex has opened up toward the equator.
The polar jet stream with significant differences in temperature at
the boundaries of adjacent air masses is as a result of the sunken atmosphere
in the polar vortex column.
A polar jet stream is manifested in the ring torus structure that has
vortically formed in its nested atmospheric polar vortex.
The shifting of jet stream latitude is caused by the intensity variations
and the rotation of its undulating polar vortex.
The ice age is is caused by the ~100,000-year precession
cycle of ecliptic plane relative to the invariable plane with its orbital
forcing of the Earth.
The axial precession of the Earth is perturbed by the two-body barycentric motion of the Solar System and the Sirius binary star system. With
credit to Frank Grime.
The Little Ice Age is as a result of the superior conjunctions of major
Solar System barycenters during a solar minimum.
The subtropical climate is primarily caused by the nested polar vortex
with its nested vortex column manifested within the boundary of the
subtropical jet stream.
The polar climate is caused by the vortically dispersed atmospheric
layers in the vortex column of a polar vortex that is filled with the
cold air from a higher atmospheric layer.
A tropical cyclone is formed by its underlying atmospheric free vortex
spawned in the troposphere.
The warm core of a tropical cyclone is as a result of a relatively warmer
air layer in the stratosphere has filled the vortex column in the cooler
A tornado is formed with an atmospheric free vortex manifested by an
intensified jet stream of its vortical system.
The cold core of a tornado is as a result of cooler air in the upper
troposphere has sunk to fill the vortex column of its atmospheric free
The upward spiraling jet of air stream of a tornado is formed by vortical
reactions of a clear air vortex with a vortical momentum that has bounced
off the ground.
The phenomena of supercell, tropical storm, and thunderstorm
are modulated by their resonated atmospheric free vortices
atmospheric precipitation is caused by vortical compression of consolidated
clouds on the atmospheric surface they are levitated.
The collision of cold front and warm front is caused by the vortical
motion of two atmospheric layers impelled by a polar jet stream.
The low pressure in a storm is caused by the vortical motion of an atmospheric
vortex in its vortex column.
The showers of uniformly spread raindrops, snowflakes, or hails in homogenous
forms are rendered by the harmonic vortex cluster formed by torque-free
precession resonated in the atmospheric vortex.
is formed by a nested clear air vortex with its angular momentum that
charges and levitates dust particles in its nested vortrex.
dust storm is formed by a huge cyclonic atmospheric free vortex that
vortically levitates the charged dust with its vortrex.
The subtropical desserts along subtropical ridge are caused by the vortical
motion of free vortices manifested in the troposphere.
The Hadley cells that form subtropical ridge are impelled by the subtropical
jet stream of its stratosphere polar vortex to form the pressure belt
air-pocket commonly experienced by cruising aircraft is caused by the
vortex column of a clear air vortex where there is a void of the usual
peculiar type of dual-core craters were formed by the hyperspherical
standing waves resonated in the Earth's crust.
An earthquake could be triggered by the forced vortices of the mantle
sphere with the precession effects of Solar System objects.
drift is caused by the vortical motion manifested in the mantle sphere
with the motion of the Earth gyrating in the Solar System.
An intraplate earthquake is caused by seismic waves generated from a
forced vortex of the mantle sphere with resonated torque-free precession.
A huge clear air unisonal vortex resonated in a fixed region on Earth
renders the mysterious circumstances of Bermuda Triangle.
A natural oceanic whirlpool is an oceanic free vortex spawned by a manifested
oceanic torque-free precession.
A deep-ocean whirlpool cluster is triggered by a focused precession
effect of a Solar System arrangement with its rendered torque-free precession.
An underwater spheroidal whirlpool is formed by a resonated toroidal
vortex manifested in deep ocean.
The Gulf Stream is manifested by the oceanic jet stream of a nested
oceanic free vortex.
A tidal bore is a traversing standing wave manifested by a resonated
torque-free precession of a wobbling Earth.
A tidal bore on Earth can be triggered seasonally with a focused precession
effect of Sun, Earth and Moon manifested at a focal point in the open
Gravity is vortically rendered by quantized electromagnetic vortices.
credits to James
Gravity is a manifestation of vortical core-seeking motion in a hypersphere
and it vortically pushes matters inward to the mass center.
Inspired by Tiny Bits
Part I on Gravity.
The gravitational singularity of a black hole emerges vortically from
a single point of zero volume as the barycenter in a resonant of aether
The gravitational singularity of a supermassive black hole is collectively
manifested with the vortical gravitational singularities of all planetary
systems in the galaxy.
Chemical elements are created by the hyperspherical vortex spin fusion
of aether vortical motion.
An atom is a cluster of vortically consolidated electromagnetic toroidal
vortices impelled by the vortical motion of the cosmos.
Lagrangian points in the microcosms are harmonics of vortically manifested
accreting spinor field rendered by vortical motion of interacting subatomic
electron is vortically resonated and the quantized accreting spinor
field spawned at the Lagrangian points in the dual-core nested electron
shells of an atom.
The subshells of 2s, 3s, 4s, and so forth, are the inner walls of the
torus transformed nested electron shells, and thus they are inversely
nearer to the nucleus than the 1s subshell.
All naturally manifested chirality pair structures formed in Möbius
strip topology are formed by the vortical motion of their nested dual-core
The nested dual-core electron shell of an atom is formed with the nested
hypersphere of a 3-sphere structure.
planetary orbitals are abscribing their primodial ring torus structures.
The Trojan asteroids are encapsulated in the force field of the torus
transformed vortical hypersphere of Jupiter at its L4 and L5 Lagrangian
An electron has a vortical form with sub-orbitals. By
Barrow inspired with the UVS model.
An electron is a nested subatomic vortex impelled by its atomic vortex.
An electron is vortically impelled on accretion disk by its atomic vortex
to intrinsically spin with apsidal precession around its precessing
nucleus in its atomic orbital.
The electron shells are pause layers of equipotential surfaces of a
nested electrostatic spheroid with different electrical energy levels.
The elementary negative charge of an electron
in an atom is rendered by its differential rotation to counter charge
its proton with the cyclonic motion of its neutron.
is a subatomic vortrex that vortically folds back to coalesce in the
hyperspherical vortex spin fusion of its electron vortex.
The electrons at opposite ends of their nucleus can interact instantaneously
is caused by the interconnectedness of their underlying atomic vortex.
The covalent bond of chemical elements is caused by the hyperspherical
vortex spin fusion of their electron shells.
Cohesion force of a molecule is a polarization charge effect caused
by the arrangement of its chemical elements with vortically merged electron
The spin frequency of an electron can be affected by gravitational potential
of Earth that has varying potential density at different altitude and
Quark is a subatomic electromagnetic vortex of vortexes. By
Barrow inspired with the UVS model.
The quarks in an atomic nucleus are EM subatomic
toroidal votices spawned at the Lagrangian points of different angular
The strong nuclear force is rendered by the vortical repulsion force
vortically exerted by the toroidal vortex of hadron.
A meson is a hadronic subatomic particles formed by one quark and one
antiquark that had vortically coalesced at their Lagrangian points with
the strong nuclear force.
A proton is a vortical substructure of an inner
hypersphere that encapsulates two merged cyclonic spheroids and an anti-cyclonic
A neutron is a vortical substructure of an outer
hypersphere that encapsulates two merged anti-cyclonic spheroids and
a cyclonic spheroid.
The weak nuclear force is rendered by the distribution of vortical repulsion
force of spheroidal atomic unisonal vortex to accrete subatomic particles.
An atomic nucleus is
a hypersphere of a 3-sphere system with a Möbius
strip topology for its nested
gluon has a vortical tubular Möbius
strip structure that carries nuclear strong force
to interact between quarks.
The invariant mass of matters is transferred
from the half-integral spin of aether corpuscle in the material phase
with condensed vortical fields of an all-pervasive aether.
A fermion is vortically formed with the
half-integral spins of its subatomic vortices in the material
phase with the condensed vortical fields of an
A lepton is vortically coalesced with the manifested Lagrangian points
of the antiquarks in its hypersphere of two-body system.
The hydrogen atoms in the universe are formed in the manifested vortical
gravitational singularities by coalescing protons as atomic nuclei with
their spawned electrons.
The stellar nucleosynthesis is caused by the hyperspherical vortex spin
fusion that assembles chemical elements with the nuclear reactions occurring
in the cores of stars.
The different types of atoms are resonated to coalesce at various periodic
cycles and angular phases with the vortical motion manifested a universal
The structures for the electron shells and subshells of an atom are
vortically resonated with the aether vortical motion of the cosmos.
A photon is vortically emitted from its electron shell with vortically
manifested reactive torque-free precession.
The corpuscles of luminiferous aether are vortically evolved and coalesced
by a nested spheroidal torus vortex system of the universe.
A photon is vortically manifested on an inviscid quantized aether corpuscle
with motion induced to it and vortically transferred from it.
An aether corpuscle is intrinsically spiraling with superluminal vortical
motion at twice the speed of light in vacuum.
The supervoid winds with elementary particles are vortically spun out
by the vortical gravitational singularity of its supervoid with reactive
winds with vortically coalesced particles are vortically spun out by
the vortical gravitational singularity of its galaxy with reactive centrifugal
The solar winds with charged particles of protons and electrons are
vortically spun out from the photosphere with reactive centrifugal force.
wave is caused by the effect of the vortically excited hyperspheres
of aether corpuscles.
of the universe is caused by the aether vortical motion in the nested
hypersphere of the cosmos.
truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to
excerpt from "Cargo
Cult Science", by Richard Feynman.
love only nature, and I hate mathematicians”
first principle is that you must not fool yourself -- and you are the
easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After
you've not fooled yourself, it's easy not to fool other scientists. You
just have to be honest in a conventional way after that.
would like to add something that's not essential to the science, but something
I kind of believe, which is that you should not fool the layman when you're
talking as a scientist. I am not trying to tell you what to do about cheating
on your wife, or fooling your girlfriend, or something like that, when
you're not trying to be a scientist, but just trying to be an ordinary
human being. We'll leave those problems up to you and your rabbi. I'm
talking about a specific, extra type of integrity that is not lying, but
bending over backwards to show how you're maybe wrong, that you ought
to have when acting as a scientist. And this is our responsibility as
scientists, certainly to other scientists, and I think to laymen.
example, I was a little surprised when I was talking to a friend who was
going to go on the radio. He does work on cosmology and astronomy, and
he wondered how he would explain what the applications of his work were.
"Well", I said, "there aren't any". He said, "Yes,
but then we won't get support for more research of this kind". I
think that's kind of dishonest. If you're representing yourself as a scientist,
then you should explain to the layman what you're doing -- and if they
don't support you under those circumstances, then that's their decision.
example of the principle is this: If you've made up your mind to test
a theory, or you want to explain some idea, you should always decide to
publish it whichever way it comes out. If we only publish results of a
certain kind, we can make the argument look good. We must publish BOTH
kinds of results.
say that's also important in giving certain types of government advice.
Supposing a senator asked you for advice about whether drilling a hole
should be done in his state; and you decide it would be better in some
other state. If you don't publish such a result, it seems to me you're
not giving scientific advice. You're being used. If your answer happens
to come out in the direction the government or the politicians like, they
can use it as an argument in their favor; if it comes out the other way,
they don't publish at all. That's not giving scientific advice.
kinds of errors are more characteristic of poor science. When I was at
Cornell, I often talked to the people in the psychology department. One
of the students told me she wanted to do an experiment that went something
like this -- it had been found by others that under certain circumstances,
X, rats did something, A. She was curious as to whether, if she changed
the circumstances to Y, they would still do A. So her proposal was to
do the experiment under circumstances Y and see if they still did A.
explained to her that it was necessary first to repeat in her laboratory
the experiment of the other person -- to do it under condition X to see
if she could also get result A, and then change to Y and see if A changed.
Then she would know the real difference was the thing she thought she
had under control.
was very delighted with this new idea, and went to her professor. And
his reply was, no, you cannot do that, because the experiment has already
been done and you would be wasting time. This was in about 1947 or so,
and it seems to have been the general policy then to not try to repeat
psychological experiments, but only to change the conditions and see what
there's a certain danger of the same thing happening, even in the famous
field of physics. I was shocked to hear of an experiment being done at
the big accelerator at the National Accelerator Laboratory, where a person
used deuterium. In order to compare his heavy hydrogen results to what
might happen with light hydrogen, he had to use data from someone else's
experiment on light hydrogen, which was done on a different apparatus.
When asked why, he said it was because he couldn't get time on the program
(because there's so little time and it's such expensive apparatus) to
do the experiment with light hydrogen on this apparatus because there
wouldn't be any new result. And so the men in charge of programs at NAL
are so anxious for new results, in order to get more money to keep the
thing going for public relations purposes, they are destroying -- possibly
-- the value of the experiments themselves, which is the whole purpose
of the thing. It is often hard for the experimenters there to complete
their work as their scientific integrity demands.
experiments in psychology are not of this type, however. For example,
there have been many experiments running rats through all kinds of mazes,
and so on -- with little clear result. But in 1937 a man named Young did
a very interesting one. He had a long corridor with doors all along one
side where the rats came in, and doors along the other side where the
food was. He wanted to see if he could train the rats to go in at the
third door down from wherever he started them off. No. The rats went immediately
to the door where the food had been the time before.
question was, how did the rats know, because the corridor was so beautifully
built and so uniform, that this was the same door as before? Obviously
there was something about the door that was different from the other doors.
So he painted the doors very carefully, arranging the textures on the
faces of the doors exactly the same. Still the rats could tell. Then he
thought maybe the rats were smelling the food, so he used chemicals to
change the smell after each run. Still the rats could tell. Then he realized
the rats might be able to tell by seeing the lights and the arrangement
in the laboratory like any commonsense person. So he covered the corridor,
and still the rats could tell.
finally found that they could tell by the way the floor sounded when they
ran over it. And he could only fix that by putting his corridor in sand.
So he covered one after another of all possible clues and finally was
able to fool the rats so that they had to learn to go in the third door.
If he relaxed any of his conditions, the rats could tell.
from a scientific standpoint, that is an A-number-one experiment. That
is the experiment that makes rat-running experiments sensible, because
it uncovers that clues that the rat is really using -- not what you think
it's using. And that is the experiment that tells exactly what conditions
you have to use in order to be careful and control everything in an experiment
looked up the subsequent history of this research. The next experiment,
and the one after that, never referred to Mr. Young. They never used any
of his criteria of putting the corridor on sand, or being very careful.
They just went right on running the rats in the same old way, and paid
no attention to the great discoveries of Mr. Young, and his papers are
not referred to, because he didn't discover anything about the rats. In
fact, he discovered all the things you have to do to discover something
about rats. But not paying attention to experiments like that
is a characteristic example of cargo cult science.
“And it's this type of integrity, this kind of care not
to fool yourself,
that is missing to a large extent in much of the research in cargo cult
note: When I was awakened to the idea of a vortical universe in May 2007
as a layperson, and subsequently developed the model of Universal Vortical
Singularity (UVS model), I did not know at all on any of such vortex theory
had ever existed. This was until Jim Mash (Author of "Fluid
Energy theory") had first brought the Cartesian
vortex cosmology by Rene Descartes to my attention in June 2008, and
later was awared of Walter
Russell Cosmogony after Dean Ward and Allen Barrow brought it to my
attention in Oct 2008. A modern era publication that had categorically
summarized the numerous studies and researches for spirals of nature as
recorded in various era, presented in "From
cosmic whirl to vortices"
by Vladimir B. Ginzburg, later came to my attention in June 2009. These
were after the vortical universe concept for the UVS treatise was already
quite developed with 138
UVS predications. Even then, the UVS trestise still has its uniqueness
among these other vortex theories on its visual inductive resolutions
developed with the UVS research methodology for numerous enigmatic natural
phenomena. June 2009.
resonated remarks for this UVS topic:
would think that every physicist, astronomer, cosmologist, and chemist
would shout HALLELUJAH! when coming upon your comprehensive and compelling
work of the UVS treatise!”
Dann, historian and naturalist, the author of 13 books, including
New York; The
Road to Walden; Expect
Great Things: The Life and Search of Henry David Thoreau; Bright
Colors Falsely Seen: Synaesthesia and the Search for Transcendental Knowledge;
the Great Border Fault: The Naturalist Myth in America; and Lewis
Creek Lost and Found. He has taught at Rutgers University, University
of Vermont, and the State University of New York.
know eventually, many will come to see and appreciate, the value of your
Aug 2020) / “Love
your work, it has been inspirational as well as foundational to me.”
Rutherford, research in
extending Milankovitch cycles studies and working on his PhD thesis,
whom had developed a software magnetometer analytical tool composed of
more than 11 million formulas to analyse and predict geology events on
Earth in the field of astro-seismology.
is lacking quantitative method, yet he is able to predict solar cycle
Dr. Victor Christianto & Dr.
Florentin Smarandache, this was a comment on the UVS
case study on the barycenter drivers of the solar cycle, mentioned
in their paper "On
the Possibility of Binary Companion of the Sun".
Wee developed an elegant periodic table presentation. Inspired by his
approach I am planning to utilize graph algorithms tools and recent advances
to attempt to expand the chemical science envelop.”
Mohamed, author of "Phosphoric
Acid and Phosphate Fertilizers", referenced to the UVS
4 of this hardcoopy book, applied a
patent (patent number: 6391080) for a related invention of a new process
designed to produce Phosphorus
that is much less polluting and much more energy efficient.
found your web page very interesting” (30th
Nov 2017) / “Your
work is really amazing.” (18th
Rosa Hilda Compagnucci, a climatologist accredited to the
Nobel Peace Prize bestowed on the IPCC in 2007, PhD degree in Meteorological
Sciences, University of Buenos Aires; UBA · Department of Atmospheric
and Ocean Sciences. Co-authored paper on "Dynamical
characterization of the last prolonged solar minima", which elaborates
with quantitative analysis on an imminent Grand Minimum.
(18th August 2014)
Richard Miles, Ph.D in Physics and Chemistry (Bristol); British Astronomical
Association. This was a comment on the
qualitative prediction of a cometary outburst event.
an exit scientist and now am industrial physicist, I admire your insight
and works highly.”
(7th July 2014)
Dr. Winston Cheng Wen-Hao, Ph.D. in particle beam physics and accelerator
theory, Post Doc: high energy particle collider design in Lawrence
Vuthipong Priebjrivat, B.S. in civil engineering from Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, M.S. in environmental engineering from Stanford
University, Ph.D. in economics and public management from the University
of Chicago, metaphysicist, corporate leader, law maker, and author of
several books such as "DRAW
YOUR THOUGHTS" that elaborates and illustrates a peculiar type
of analytical method, "DHARMODYNAMICS",
that coherently elaborate with "draw your thoughts" on some
intrinsic structures for nature of reality in its transcendental perspectivalism.
picture on some of these books.
a brilliant treatise that credibly extends modern human scientific knowledge
and awareness of "How The Universe And Everything In It Truly Works".'
Wayne Nowland, physicist,
researcher, philosopher and author, planned and launched Australia's first
communications satellite system.
loved reading your research again. It does make me rethink and in some
cases, relearn my understanding of the cosmos.”
(28th Aug 2012)
Christopher W. Hodshire from Western Michigan University.
fully subscribe to the vortex theory---it makes mechanical sense more
than mathematical sense. It doesn't make any difference if you think the
world is infinite---the vortex theory will work on its own merits.”
(4th Jul 2011)
- Gerald (aka spacedout of TOEQuest Forum).
UNIVERSAL VORTICAL SINGULARITY is the best cosmological model available
today to explain the Universe.” (23th
Nolan, blog writer of “Holographic
shifting, convention breaching, fractally
approach to the immutable
integration of pan-phenomena,
facto universal, into a cohesive conceptual entity
without invoking inchoate
dissonant exploratory tendrils,
leads me to this incontrovertible
inclined, infer analogous
identification of UVS with spherically expressed, macrobiotic composites,
as multi-layered organic constructs teleologically
destined to entrain
21st Sep 2010)
- Ophiolite of Naked Science Forum.
needed no convincing about your work because it overlaps my own thoughts
for many years now....”
- Michael Henning, University of Cape Town 1977 BBSC.
intriguing website full of enlightening concepts and analyses!”
- Dr. Wayne Nowland,
physicist, researcher, philosopher, and author, planned
and launched Australia's first AUSSAT
communications satellite system.
speaking, even in its present mostly qualitative form, UVS makes a significant
contribution to the discovery of spiral nature of the universe. No person
holds a complete truth about the nature of the universe, and UVS brings
attention of scientists to an interesting path of solving this very challenging
great respect, Vladimir.”
Vladimir B. Ginzburg, mathematician,
accomplished material scientist, author of "Prime
Elements of Ordinary Matter, Dark Matter & Dark Energy",
"Spiral Grain of the Universe" and several other renowned books
such as "Metallurgical
Design of Flat Rolled Steels" for applied science, and holds
over fifty U.S. and foreign patents.
is the future of science.”
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum); author of "NINE
model is valid for all atomic particles as long as one realizes they must
be viewed as three dimensional vortices; that’s how they interact
with the spatial Aether, but that’s another story.”
- David Levi Wing (aka dleviwing, moderator of TOEQuest forum; author
of Physics, The
Mystery of Mass, Wave
I am convinced that UVS would give satisfactory answers to most of the
- Dipayan Kar (aka dipayankar of TOEQuest Forum).
totally agree with the science you present.”
- Dean Ward, a very knowledgeable researcher with in-depth knowledge in
Universe and Aether
Vincent, I have been reading posts in forums like this one since forums
began, and you are the first poster to spark my imagination again, and
I like to thank you for this.”
- Allen Barrow (aka PoPpAScience of TOEQuest Forum).
is coming in a big way.”
- Mr. Au Mun Chew, sidewalk astronomer, retired lecturer of the
National University of Singapore.
quality or state of being actual or real.
first principles, before experience; from what comes before. Involving
logical reasoning from a general principle to a necessary effect;
valid independently of observation.
postulation; to assume or assert the truth or necessity of, especially
as a basis of an argument. n. An unproved assertion or assumption,
especially a statement offered as the basis of a theory.
that is independent of all particular experiences, as opposed to a
posteriori knowledge, which derives from experience.
or suggesting something to be considered, accepted, adopted, or done.
what comes later; after experience. From particular effects to a general
principle; based upon actual observation or upon experimental data:
an a posteriori argument that derives the theory from the evidence.
Knowledge that derived from experience.
posteriori offering or suggesting something
to be considered, accepted, adopted, or done.
act or process of knowing; perception. The product of such a process;
something thus known, perceived, etc.
contradicting perception in the cognition for its perceived actuality.
formal logical fallacy of a cognitive paradox.
false belief or opinion: delusions of grandeur.
from or guided by experience or experiment; provable or verifiable
by experience or experiment.
that baffles understanding and cannot be explained.
greater knowledge and understanding about a subject or situation.
conditions for acquiring knowledge.
first basis from which a thing is known.
proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for
the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted
merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working
hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established
form of analysis based on inductive reasoning; a researcher using
inductive analysis starts with answers, but forms questions throughout
the research process.
great world or universe; the universe considered as a whole (opposed
to microcosm ). A representation of a smaller unit or entity by a
larger one, presumably of a similar structure.
little world; a world in miniature (opposed to macrocosm ).
natural phenomenon is a non-artificial event in the physical sense,
and therefore not produced by humans, although it may affect humans.
state of existence beyond perceivable bandwidth therefore renders
as nothing in the perceived state; the state of being nothing.
segment of the universe.
set of forms all of which contain a particular element, esp. the set
of all inflected forms based on a single stem or theme.
thing, or situation exhibiting an apparently contradictory nature
with false proposition.
effects of a cognitive paradox that is rendered in its state of delusion
to persistently fool us in a perception with its cognitive fallacy.
put forward as the factual basis for an argument; a fundamental setting
or basis of its hypothesis or theory.
assume the truth, reality, or necessity of, as a basis of an argument.
principle proposition assumed or perceived to be true for its hypothesis
or theory; an axiom.
revealed or disclosed, especially a striking disclosure, as of something
not before realized.
act of analyzing a complex notion into simpler ones; the point in
a literary work at which the complication is worked out.
as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
theory that has achieved scientific consensus that its accepted explanation
through a scientific model is based on observation, experimentation,
peculiarity, a unique quality, a state of being singular.
The term singularity here despite entails, does not refer to mathematical
singularity nor the gravitational singularity.
has very general reference to a class of existence with a similarity.
geometrical figure similar in shape to a sphere, such as an ellipsoid.
or functioning below the threshold of consciousness or perception.
this context, it refers to the postulated reality that is subjected
to the posits of a theory for construing the objective reality.
coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation
for a class of phenomena.
beyond ordinary or common experience, thought, or belief.
process in which all elements behave in the same way at the same time;
simultaneous or synchronous parallel action.
totality of known or supposed objects and phenomena throughout space;
the cosmos; macrocosm. It is beyond the defined observed universe.
To give official sanction, confirmation, or approval to, as elected
officials, election procedures, documents, etc.
the property of viscosity; sticky.
hypersphere formed with intrinsic vortical motion.
four-dimensional spheroidal culmination of aether with vortical motion
that unisonally spawns its resonated nested vortical fractals in its
and animation credits:
The flow chart for "The epistemic
process and methodology of the UVS research" - Credit
of Vincent Wee-Foo
for Venus orbit - Nichalp
phases of Venus - Statis Kalyvas
of the M81 galaxy - Photo credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
Image of Our
Solar System - Free clip art by cksinfo.com
of star HL Tau
- Credit: Greaves, Richards, Rice & Muxlow 2008
A sketch of unisonal vortex - Vincent Wee-Foo
transformation of torus - By Lucas Vieira; Wiki
for the retrograde motion of Mars - © Eugene Alvin Villar, 2008
epitrochoid - Sam Derbyshire at en.wikipedia
animated simulation for phases of Venus
- Physics Flashlets by Michael Timmins
animated simulation of Michelson-Morley experiment
- Physics Flashlets; Michael Fowler
raisin pudding model
- Brad's Astro Pages;
Western Washington University Planetarium
clip on "Ptolemy's geocentric universe"
You Tube; twistedlot
clip on "Earth Rotation & Revolution around a moving Sun"
- By Kurdistan Planetarium
clip "The solar system's motion thru space"
- By The Resonance Project / Nassim Haramein.avi
video clip on simulating Michelson-Morley experiment in aether wind
- You Tube; pepenjuto
classified denotations with URL links for the individual words and specific
phrases denoted in the UVS treatise:
|A specific UVS topic or a source from the UVS treatise.
definition for the word in the glossary list of the UVS treatise.
general definitions for the word from an the Internet dictionary source.
specific topic of the free encyclopedia by Wikipedia.
miscellaneous Internet source.
The Internet source for the inserted image or animation.
inception of this UVS topic was in 2008 with ongoing updates since.
was reset on 02/02/2010
The treatise of Universal Vortical Singularity (UVS) in its epistemological
paradigm shift, is fundamentally unconventional. Its hypotheses grounded
on a generally unheard-of UVS model, bound to have shortcomings, such
as loose ends, errors, and omissions errors. Many details and assumptions
in its propositions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated,
validated, or verified. Its implicit explanations are for casual understanding
of the UVS topics presented in the UVS worldview, so if any term or statement
is offensive in any manner from whatsoever perspectives, is most regretted.
Links to other sites do not imply endorsement of their contents; apply
appropriate discretion whenever necessary. Also, the content of the UVS
topics, from time to time could be arbitrarily modified without any notice.
tips: Despite the presentations of the UVS web pages has went through
much accommodation for their viewings on smart phones, they are still
not entirely friendly to these mobile devices. For the best experiences,
use a MS Windows based PC or computer system with Java enabled browser
for running its interactive applets.
(Such as Java
Applet of Moiré pattern,
Small-Body Database Browser, and
information: This UVS web site is for non-profit purposes and not for
commercial use. Wherever possible, direct credits to the origins of the
works or images were provided, be it on
dealings, with explicit permission from
their owners, or the materials were believed to be from the public